Remnant cholesterol and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in Korean adults.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Byung Jin Kim, Mi Yeon Lee, Eun Hye Cho, Youngwoo Jang, Jeonggyu Kang
{"title":"Remnant cholesterol and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in Korean adults.","authors":"Byung Jin Kim, Mi Yeon Lee, Eun Hye Cho, Youngwoo Jang, Jeonggyu Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have investigated the relationship between remnant cholesterol (RC) and mortality outcomes in the general population, but the majority have focused on Western populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the association between RC and mortality-related outcomes in a relatively young and middle-aged Korean population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study included 268,219 participants (mean age, 38 years; 50.6% men) who were enrolled in the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study between 2003 and 2016. Fasting RC was calculated as total cholesterol minus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol minus high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median RC was 0.47 mmol/L (18 mg/dL) and the prevalence of ≥1 mmol/L RC was 11.4%. During the median follow-up of 6.7 years, compared with the lowest quintile (RC <0.31 mmol/L), the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for cardiovascular mortality were 1.95 [0.78, 4.84], 2.47 [1.03, 5.91], 2.39 [1.00, 5.72], and 2.84 [1.19, 6.78] in the second, third, fourth, and highest quintiles, respectively. The HRs for all-cause mortality in the third, fourth, and highest quintiles remained significant but were not significant for the risk of cancer mortality. Subgroup analyses showed that the high RC group with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) or high lipoprotein(a) levels had more than 2-fold and 3-fold increased risks of cardiovascular mortality than the low RC group with low hsCRP or low lipoprotein(a) levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High RC levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, but not with cancer mortality. Specifically, high hsCRP and lipoprotein(a) levels weighted the risk association between high RC and cardiovascular mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.02.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have investigated the relationship between remnant cholesterol (RC) and mortality outcomes in the general population, but the majority have focused on Western populations.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the association between RC and mortality-related outcomes in a relatively young and middle-aged Korean population.

Methods: This cohort study included 268,219 participants (mean age, 38 years; 50.6% men) who were enrolled in the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study between 2003 and 2016. Fasting RC was calculated as total cholesterol minus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol minus high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Results: The median RC was 0.47 mmol/L (18 mg/dL) and the prevalence of ≥1 mmol/L RC was 11.4%. During the median follow-up of 6.7 years, compared with the lowest quintile (RC <0.31 mmol/L), the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for cardiovascular mortality were 1.95 [0.78, 4.84], 2.47 [1.03, 5.91], 2.39 [1.00, 5.72], and 2.84 [1.19, 6.78] in the second, third, fourth, and highest quintiles, respectively. The HRs for all-cause mortality in the third, fourth, and highest quintiles remained significant but were not significant for the risk of cancer mortality. Subgroup analyses showed that the high RC group with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) or high lipoprotein(a) levels had more than 2-fold and 3-fold increased risks of cardiovascular mortality than the low RC group with low hsCRP or low lipoprotein(a) levels.

Conclusion: High RC levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, but not with cancer mortality. Specifically, high hsCRP and lipoprotein(a) levels weighted the risk association between high RC and cardiovascular mortality.

韩国成人的残余胆固醇与心血管和全因死亡率。
背景:以前的研究已经调查了普通人群中残余胆固醇(RC)与死亡率结局之间的关系,但大多数研究集中在西方人群。目的:本研究旨在评估相对年轻和中年的韩国人群中RC和死亡率相关结果之间的关系。方法:本队列研究纳入268,219名参与者(平均年龄38岁;2003年至2016年期间参加江北三星健康研究的50.6%男性)。空腹RC计算为总胆固醇减去低密度脂蛋白胆固醇减去高密度脂蛋白胆固醇。结果:中位RC为0.47 mmol/L (18 mg/dL),≥1 mmol/L RC患病率为11.4%。在中位随访6.7年期间,与最低五分之一(RC)相比,结论:高RC水平与心血管和全因死亡率风险增加显著相关,但与癌症死亡率无关。具体来说,高hsCRP和脂蛋白(a)水平加重了高RC和心血管死亡率之间的风险关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信