Interlaboratory comparison of serum lipoprotein(a) analytical results across clinical assays-Steps toward standardization.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Alicia N Lyle, Elias N Flores, Clark C Coffman, Alex H Doty, Otoe Sugahara, Florian Kronenberg, L Renee Ruhaak, Christa M Cobbaert, Hubert W Vesper
{"title":"Interlaboratory comparison of serum lipoprotein(a) analytical results across clinical assays-Steps toward standardization.","authors":"Alicia N Lyle, Elias N Flores, Clark C Coffman, Alex H Doty, Otoe Sugahara, Florian Kronenberg, L Renee Ruhaak, Christa M Cobbaert, Hubert W Vesper","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Recent clinical guidelines recommend measuring Lp(a); however, the lack of Lp(a) assay standardization presents challenges to using common clinical decision points. Assay standardization may minimize inter-assay variability. This improves consistency in CVD risk assessment and evaluations of Lp(a) therapeutic efficacy. Genetically determined size variations in the defining apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein contribute to inter-individual Lp(a) heterogeneity. Individuals who express 2 apo(a) isoforms have 2 sizes of apo(a) in circulation, further contributing to Lp(a) heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Clinical Standardization Programs (CDC CSP) recently launched an Lp(a) standardization program based on the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry endorsed liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry-based reference measurement procedure (RMP). As part of this program, CDC CSP conducted an interlaboratory comparison study to evaluate current Lp(a) inter-assay variability and to investigate potential factors contributing to measurement variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight clinical laboratories measured Lp(a) in 40 individual donor serum samples and 3 serum pools. Serum samples were immunophenotyped by Western blot analysis to determine Lp(a) isoform sizes. Sample concentrations were measured in duplicate over 2 independent runs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assay-specific Lp(a) measurements demonstrated good linear correlation with the RMP. Lp(a) inter-assay measurement variations ranged from 3.3% to 69.1% across individual samples; however, Lp(a) inter-assay coefficients of variation did not increase in a concentration-dependent manner and were not correlated with Lp(a) isoform sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides new insights into Lp(a) inter-assay variability and assay performance in clinical laboratories that will guide future standardization efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.02.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Recent clinical guidelines recommend measuring Lp(a); however, the lack of Lp(a) assay standardization presents challenges to using common clinical decision points. Assay standardization may minimize inter-assay variability. This improves consistency in CVD risk assessment and evaluations of Lp(a) therapeutic efficacy. Genetically determined size variations in the defining apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein contribute to inter-individual Lp(a) heterogeneity. Individuals who express 2 apo(a) isoforms have 2 sizes of apo(a) in circulation, further contributing to Lp(a) heterogeneity.

Objective: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Clinical Standardization Programs (CDC CSP) recently launched an Lp(a) standardization program based on the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry endorsed liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry-based reference measurement procedure (RMP). As part of this program, CDC CSP conducted an interlaboratory comparison study to evaluate current Lp(a) inter-assay variability and to investigate potential factors contributing to measurement variability.

Methods: Eight clinical laboratories measured Lp(a) in 40 individual donor serum samples and 3 serum pools. Serum samples were immunophenotyped by Western blot analysis to determine Lp(a) isoform sizes. Sample concentrations were measured in duplicate over 2 independent runs.

Results: Assay-specific Lp(a) measurements demonstrated good linear correlation with the RMP. Lp(a) inter-assay measurement variations ranged from 3.3% to 69.1% across individual samples; however, Lp(a) inter-assay coefficients of variation did not increase in a concentration-dependent manner and were not correlated with Lp(a) isoform sizes.

Conclusion: This study provides new insights into Lp(a) inter-assay variability and assay performance in clinical laboratories that will guide future standardization efforts.

跨临床分析的血清脂蛋白(a)分析结果的实验室间比较-迈向标准化的步骤。
背景:脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)]是心血管疾病(CVD)的独立危险因素。最近的临床指南建议测量Lp(a);然而,缺乏Lp(a)测定标准化对使用常见的临床决策点提出了挑战。测定标准化可以最大限度地减少测定间的差异。这提高了心血管疾病风险评估和Lp(a)治疗效果评估的一致性。遗传决定的载脂蛋白(a)[载脂蛋白(a)]蛋白的大小变化有助于个体间Lp(a)的异质性。表达2种载脂蛋白(a)异构体的个体在循环中有2种大小的载脂蛋白(a),进一步导致Lp(a)异质性。目的:疾病控制和预防中心的临床标准化计划(CDC CSP)最近启动了一项Lp(a)标准化计划,该计划基于国际临床化学联合会认可的基于液相色谱质谱的参考测量程序(RMP)。作为该计划的一部分,CDC CSP进行了一项实验室间比较研究,以评估当前Lp(a)在测定间的可变性,并调查导致测量可变性的潜在因素。方法:8个临床实验室对40份个体供者血清和3个血清池进行Lp(a)测定。血清样品经免疫印迹分析确定Lp(a)亚型大小。样品浓度在两个独立的运行中重复测量。结果:测定特异性Lp(a)值与RMP呈良好的线性相关。Lp(a)测定间在单个样品中的变化范围为3.3%至69.1%;然而,Lp(a)测定间变异系数没有以浓度依赖的方式增加,也与Lp(a)亚型大小无关。结论:本研究为临床实验室中Lp(a)测定间变异性和测定性能提供了新的见解,将指导未来的标准化工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信