Systemic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease and Serious Infections in Older Adults.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Aaron M Drucker, Rinku Sutradhar, Vicki Ling, Jodi M Gatley, Lihi Eder, Christine Fahim, Michael Fralick, Tara Gomes, Ping Li, Sue MacDougall, Morris Manolson, Paula A Rochon, Mina Tadrous
{"title":"Systemic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease and Serious Infections in Older Adults.","authors":"Aaron M Drucker, Rinku Sutradhar, Vicki Ling, Jodi M Gatley, Lihi Eder, Christine Fahim, Michael Fralick, Tara Gomes, Ping Li, Sue MacDougall, Morris Manolson, Paula A Rochon, Mina Tadrous","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.0144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Systemic treatments for psoriatic disease affect the immune system and may increase infection risk. Older adults are at high risk for infection, and the relative safety of systemic treatments for them is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association of systemic treatments for psoriatic disease with rates of serious infection among older adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used linked population-based health administrative data from 2002 to 2021 in Ontario, Canada. Participants included Ontario residents 66 years and older with psoriatic disease who were dispensed their first systemic medication between April 1, 2002, and December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed between November 2021 and August 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Time-varying use of systemic medications categorized as (1) methotrexate; (2) other older systemic medications; (3) anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics; (4) other biologics (targeting interleukin [IL]-12, IL-23, and IL-17); and (5) tofacitinib.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was time to serious infection, defined as hospitalization for any infectious cause occurring up to March 2021. Multivariable Andersen-Gill recurrent event regression was used to estimate the association between each medication category and serious infection rates. The relative rates (RRs) of serious infection with 95% CIs for time actively using each medication category vs time not using that medication category were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 11 641 new users of systemic therapy, 6114 (53%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 71 (68-76) years. There were 1967 serious infections during a median (IQR) of 4.8 (2.3-8.4) years of follow-up. There were 2.7 serious infections per 100 person-years using methotrexate, 2.5 per 100 person-years using other older systemic drugs, 2.2 per 100 person-years using anti-TNF biologics, 1.4 per 100 person-years using other biologics, and 8.9 per 100 person-years using tofacitinib. In the multivariable-adjusted model, methotrexate (RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.85-1.07]), other older systemic medications (RR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.79-1.07]), and anti-TNF biologics (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.69-1.10]) were not associated with serious infection compared to person-time not using those respective medications. Other biologics (RR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48-0.88]) were associated with lower rates of serious infection, whereas tofacitinib (RR, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.14-7.34]) was associated with higher rates of serious infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, biologics targeting IL-12, IL-23, or IL-17 were associated with a lower rate of serious infection among older adults with psoriatic disease. These biologics may have important safety benefits for older adults with higher infection risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.0144","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Systemic treatments for psoriatic disease affect the immune system and may increase infection risk. Older adults are at high risk for infection, and the relative safety of systemic treatments for them is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the association of systemic treatments for psoriatic disease with rates of serious infection among older adults.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used linked population-based health administrative data from 2002 to 2021 in Ontario, Canada. Participants included Ontario residents 66 years and older with psoriatic disease who were dispensed their first systemic medication between April 1, 2002, and December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed between November 2021 and August 2024.

Exposure: Time-varying use of systemic medications categorized as (1) methotrexate; (2) other older systemic medications; (3) anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics; (4) other biologics (targeting interleukin [IL]-12, IL-23, and IL-17); and (5) tofacitinib.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was time to serious infection, defined as hospitalization for any infectious cause occurring up to March 2021. Multivariable Andersen-Gill recurrent event regression was used to estimate the association between each medication category and serious infection rates. The relative rates (RRs) of serious infection with 95% CIs for time actively using each medication category vs time not using that medication category were calculated.

Results: Of 11 641 new users of systemic therapy, 6114 (53%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 71 (68-76) years. There were 1967 serious infections during a median (IQR) of 4.8 (2.3-8.4) years of follow-up. There were 2.7 serious infections per 100 person-years using methotrexate, 2.5 per 100 person-years using other older systemic drugs, 2.2 per 100 person-years using anti-TNF biologics, 1.4 per 100 person-years using other biologics, and 8.9 per 100 person-years using tofacitinib. In the multivariable-adjusted model, methotrexate (RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.85-1.07]), other older systemic medications (RR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.79-1.07]), and anti-TNF biologics (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.69-1.10]) were not associated with serious infection compared to person-time not using those respective medications. Other biologics (RR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48-0.88]) were associated with lower rates of serious infection, whereas tofacitinib (RR, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.14-7.34]) was associated with higher rates of serious infection.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, biologics targeting IL-12, IL-23, or IL-17 were associated with a lower rate of serious infection among older adults with psoriatic disease. These biologics may have important safety benefits for older adults with higher infection risk.

重要性:银屑病的系统治疗会影响免疫系统,并可能增加感染风险。老年人是感染的高危人群,而系统性治疗对他们的相对安全性尚不清楚:目的:评估银屑病系统治疗与老年人严重感染率之间的关系:这项队列研究使用的是 2002 年至 2021 年加拿大安大略省的相关人口健康管理数据。参与者包括患有银屑病的安大略省 66 岁及以上居民,他们在 2002 年 4 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间首次获得系统性药物治疗。数据分析时间为2021年11月至2024年8月。暴露:全身用药的时间变化,分为(1)甲氨蝶呤;(2)其他较老的全身用药;(3)抗肿瘤坏死因子(anti-TNF)生物制剂;(4)其他生物制剂(针对白细胞介素[IL]-12、IL-23和IL-17);以及(5)托法替尼:主要结果是发生严重感染的时间,即截至 2021 年 3 月因任何感染原因住院的时间。采用多变量安徒生-吉尔复发事件回归法估算每种药物类别与严重感染率之间的关系。计算了积极使用各类药物时间与未使用该类药物时间的严重感染相对率(RRs)及 95% CIs:在 11 641 名接受系统治疗的新用户中,6114 人(53%)为女性,中位(IQR)年龄为 71(68-76)岁。在中位数(IQR)为 4.8(2.3-8.4)年的随访期间,共发生了 1967 例严重感染。使用甲氨蝶呤时,每 100 人年发生 2.7 例严重感染;使用其他较老的系统药物时,每 100 人年发生 2.5 例严重感染;使用抗肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂时,每 100 人年发生 2.2 例严重感染;使用其他生物制剂时,每 100 人年发生 1.4 例严重感染;使用托法替尼时,每 100 人年发生 8.9 例严重感染。在多变量调整模型中,与不使用这些药物的患者相比,甲氨蝶呤(RR,0.95 [95% CI,0.85-1.07])、其他较老的系统性药物(RR,0.92 [95% CI,0.79-1.07])和抗肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂(RR,0.87 [95% CI,0.69-1.10])与严重感染无关。其他生物制剂(RR,0.65 [95% CI,0.48-0.88])与较低的严重感染率相关,而托法替尼(RR,2.89 [95% CI,1.14-7.34])与较高的严重感染率相关:在这项队列研究中,针对IL-12、IL-23或IL-17的生物制剂与银屑病老年患者较低的严重感染率有关。这些生物制剂可能对感染风险较高的老年人有重要的安全益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信