The impact of multi-modality fusion and deep learning on adult age estimation based on bone mineral density.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Yongjie Cao, Ji Zhang, Yonggang Ma, Suhua Zhang, Chengtao Li, Shiquan Liu, Feng Chen, Ping Huang
{"title":"The impact of multi-modality fusion and deep learning on adult age estimation based on bone mineral density.","authors":"Yongjie Cao, Ji Zhang, Yonggang Ma, Suhua Zhang, Chengtao Li, Shiquan Liu, Feng Chen, Ping Huang","doi":"10.1007/s00414-025-03432-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Age estimation, especially in adults, presents substantial challenges in different contexts ranging from forensic to clinical applications. Bone mineral density (BMD), with its distinct age-related variations, has emerged as a critical marker in this domain. This study aims to enhance chronological age estimation accuracy using deep learning (DL) incorporating a multi-modality fusion strategy based on BMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 4296 CT scans from a Chinese population, covering August 2015 to November 2022, encompassing lumbar, femur, and pubis modalities. Our DL approach, integrating multi-modality fusion, was applied to predict chronological age automatically. The model's performance was evaluated using an internal real-world clinical cohort of 644 scans (December 2022 to May 2023) and an external cadaver validation cohort of 351 scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In single-modality assessments, the lumbar modality excelled. However, multi-modality models demonstrated superior performance, evidenced by lower mean absolute errors (MAEs) and higher Pearson's R² values. The optimal multi-modality model exhibited outstanding R² values of 0.89 overall, 0.88 in females, 0.90 in males, with the MAEs of 4.05 overall, 3.69 in females, 4.33 in males in the internal validation cohort. In the external cadaver validation, the model maintained favourable R² values (0.84 overall, 0.89 in females, 0.82 in males) and MAEs (5.01 overall, 4.71 in females, 5.09 in males), highlighting its generalizability across diverse scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of multi-modalities fusion with DL significantly refines the accuracy of adult age estimation based on BMD. The AI-based system that effectively combines multi-modalities BMD data, presenting a robust and innovative tool for accurate AAE, poised to significantly improve both geriatric diagnostics and forensic investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03432-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Age estimation, especially in adults, presents substantial challenges in different contexts ranging from forensic to clinical applications. Bone mineral density (BMD), with its distinct age-related variations, has emerged as a critical marker in this domain. This study aims to enhance chronological age estimation accuracy using deep learning (DL) incorporating a multi-modality fusion strategy based on BMD.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 4296 CT scans from a Chinese population, covering August 2015 to November 2022, encompassing lumbar, femur, and pubis modalities. Our DL approach, integrating multi-modality fusion, was applied to predict chronological age automatically. The model's performance was evaluated using an internal real-world clinical cohort of 644 scans (December 2022 to May 2023) and an external cadaver validation cohort of 351 scans.

Results: In single-modality assessments, the lumbar modality excelled. However, multi-modality models demonstrated superior performance, evidenced by lower mean absolute errors (MAEs) and higher Pearson's R² values. The optimal multi-modality model exhibited outstanding R² values of 0.89 overall, 0.88 in females, 0.90 in males, with the MAEs of 4.05 overall, 3.69 in females, 4.33 in males in the internal validation cohort. In the external cadaver validation, the model maintained favourable R² values (0.84 overall, 0.89 in females, 0.82 in males) and MAEs (5.01 overall, 4.71 in females, 5.09 in males), highlighting its generalizability across diverse scenarios.

Conclusion: The integration of multi-modalities fusion with DL significantly refines the accuracy of adult age estimation based on BMD. The AI-based system that effectively combines multi-modalities BMD data, presenting a robust and innovative tool for accurate AAE, poised to significantly improve both geriatric diagnostics and forensic investigations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信