{"title":"Psychedelic iatrogenic structural dissociation: an exploratory hypothesis on dissociative risks in psychedelic use.","authors":"Steven Elfrink, Leigh Bergin","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1528253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper introduces the hypothesis of Psychedelic Iatrogenic Structural Dissociation (PISD), proposing that psychedelics may reactivate dissociated traumatic material, increasing the risk of psychological destabilization in trauma-exposed individuals. Grounded in structural dissociation theory, this framework suggests that psychedelics can disrupt the balance between daily functioning (the Apparently Normal Personality, ANP) and trauma-related responses (the Emotional Personality, EP), leading to the resurfacing of unintegrated memories. A review of recent studies highlights persistent adverse effects associated with psychedelic use, including emotional dysregulation, identity fragmentation, derealization, and perceptual disturbances, particularly among individuals with early trauma histories. To mitigate these risks and facilitate trauma processing, integration practices, body-focused therapies, and structured social support systems are proposed as key interventions. Additionally, emerging neurophysiological models suggest that psychedelics may reconfigure dissociative processes through the modulation of entrenched patterns, potentially facilitating trauma integration or increasing vulnerability to destabilization, depending on individual and contextual factors. These findings underscore the necessity of trauma-informed screening, preparation, and integration protocols to enhance the safety and efficacy of psychedelic therapies, particularly for vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1528253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1528253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper introduces the hypothesis of Psychedelic Iatrogenic Structural Dissociation (PISD), proposing that psychedelics may reactivate dissociated traumatic material, increasing the risk of psychological destabilization in trauma-exposed individuals. Grounded in structural dissociation theory, this framework suggests that psychedelics can disrupt the balance between daily functioning (the Apparently Normal Personality, ANP) and trauma-related responses (the Emotional Personality, EP), leading to the resurfacing of unintegrated memories. A review of recent studies highlights persistent adverse effects associated with psychedelic use, including emotional dysregulation, identity fragmentation, derealization, and perceptual disturbances, particularly among individuals with early trauma histories. To mitigate these risks and facilitate trauma processing, integration practices, body-focused therapies, and structured social support systems are proposed as key interventions. Additionally, emerging neurophysiological models suggest that psychedelics may reconfigure dissociative processes through the modulation of entrenched patterns, potentially facilitating trauma integration or increasing vulnerability to destabilization, depending on individual and contextual factors. These findings underscore the necessity of trauma-informed screening, preparation, and integration protocols to enhance the safety and efficacy of psychedelic therapies, particularly for vulnerable populations.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.