The effect of blended educational methods in communication skills in nursing with students' interactions with patients: A quasi-experimental study.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1479_23
Seyed Hossein Kalati, Neda Ahmadzadeh Tori, Javaneh Kalati, Nastaran Norouzi Parashkouh, Hengameh Karimi
{"title":"The effect of blended educational methods in communication skills in nursing with students' interactions with patients: A quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Seyed Hossein Kalati, Neda Ahmadzadeh Tori, Javaneh Kalati, Nastaran Norouzi Parashkouh, Hengameh Karimi","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1479_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regarding the importance of effective communication in delivering satisfactory nursing care, the current study aims to assess the effect of blended educational methods (lecturing, workshop, role-playing, and group discussion) in nursing students' communication skills course.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This educational evaluation study was conducted in two educational steps using the quasi-experimental method in Ramsar School of Nursing and Midwifery in 2015. In the first step, communication skills were taught in blended educational methods to all newly admitted nursing students of the fall semester (n = 33). In the second step, after 2 weeks, to evaluate the educational outcome, the communication skills of the students as an experimental group were compared with those of students in the fifth semester as a control group who did not receive any communication skills training (n = 25).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the paired sample <i>t</i>-test showed a significant difference in the scores for the pre-test and post-test (<i>P</i> < .001). The results of an independent <i>t</i>-test do not indicate any significant difference between the two groups. Only in the listening skills domain, for the item \"Avoiding interrupting the audience\", there was a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group (<i>P</i> = 0.04). Two-way multivariate analysis of variance based on Wilks Lambda effect shows that only gender has a significant effect in communication skills terms (F (7, 45) =2.590, <i>P</i> < .001, η<sup>2</sup>= 0.287).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, participating in blended methods for communication skills courses can be as effective in improving communication skills as 2 years of experiential learning of communication skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1479_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regarding the importance of effective communication in delivering satisfactory nursing care, the current study aims to assess the effect of blended educational methods (lecturing, workshop, role-playing, and group discussion) in nursing students' communication skills course.

Materials and methods: This educational evaluation study was conducted in two educational steps using the quasi-experimental method in Ramsar School of Nursing and Midwifery in 2015. In the first step, communication skills were taught in blended educational methods to all newly admitted nursing students of the fall semester (n = 33). In the second step, after 2 weeks, to evaluate the educational outcome, the communication skills of the students as an experimental group were compared with those of students in the fifth semester as a control group who did not receive any communication skills training (n = 25).

Results: The results of the paired sample t-test showed a significant difference in the scores for the pre-test and post-test (P < .001). The results of an independent t-test do not indicate any significant difference between the two groups. Only in the listening skills domain, for the item "Avoiding interrupting the audience", there was a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group (P = 0.04). Two-way multivariate analysis of variance based on Wilks Lambda effect shows that only gender has a significant effect in communication skills terms (F (7, 45) =2.590, P < .001, η2= 0.287).

Conclusion: According to the results, participating in blended methods for communication skills courses can be as effective in improving communication skills as 2 years of experiential learning of communication skills.

护理沟通技巧混合式教学方法对学生与病人互动的影响:一项准实验研究。
背景:考虑到有效沟通对提供满意护理的重要性,本研究旨在评估混合教学方法(讲座、工作坊、角色扮演和小组讨论)在护生沟通技巧课程中的效果。材料与方法:本教育评价研究于2015年在拉姆萨尔护理与助产学院采用准实验方法分两个教育步骤进行。第一步,采用混合式教学方法对秋季新生进行沟通技巧教学(n = 33)。第二步,在2周后,为了评估教学效果,将实验组学生的沟通技巧与第五学期未接受任何沟通技巧训练的对照组学生进行比较(n = 25)。结果:配对样本t检验结果显示,前测和后测得分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。独立t检验的结果没有显示两组之间有任何显著差异。仅在听力技能方面,在“避免打断听众”这一项上,对照组与实验组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.04)。基于Wilks Lambda效应的双向多变量方差分析显示,只有性别对沟通技巧术语有显著影响(F (7,45) =2.590, P < 0.001, η2= 0.287)。结论:根据研究结果,参加混合式沟通技巧课程的沟通技巧提高效果与2年的沟通技巧体验式学习效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信