Access to and Satisfaction with the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program: Differences Across Race, Ethnicity, Income, and Urbanicity among Missouri Residents.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Amanda Gilbert, Tyler Frank, Laura McDermott, Najjuwah Walden, Jason Jabbari, Stephen Roll, Dan Ferris
{"title":"Access to and Satisfaction with the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program: Differences Across Race, Ethnicity, Income, and Urbanicity among Missouri Residents.","authors":"Amanda Gilbert, Tyler Frank, Laura McDermott, Najjuwah Walden, Jason Jabbari, Stephen Roll, Dan Ferris","doi":"10.1177/03795721251323312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is a federal nutrition assistance program aiming to address food insecurity and improve health. Participation varies across marginalized groups (eg, Black, Hispanic, low-income, rural), likely due to WIC access barriers and satisfaction, limiting WIC's impact on health disparities.ObjectiveAssess WIC access and satisfaction across marginalized groups to understand determinants of WIC participation in Missouri, where food insecurity is high (11% overall, 12% Hispanic, 26% Black) and WIC participation low (41%).MethodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the Missouri WIC Experience Survey (April 2022-June 2022). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression assessed access (eg, clinic wait times, clinic hours, clinic location) and satisfaction (eg, nutrition education, meeting dietary needs, shopping experience) across race/ethnicity, income, and urbanicity.ResultsThe sample (<i>n</i> = 2232) consisted of 69% White, 16% Black, and 8% Hispanic WIC-eligible households. Most had monthly incomes of $4000 or less (69%) and 32% lived in rural areas. Black households had 75% higher odds of experiencing barriers compared to White households. Compared to urban households, rural households experienced 30% lower odds of being satisfied overall with WIC, but 75% higher odds of being satisfied with WIC meeting dietary needs. Hispanic households had 85% higher odds than White households of being satisfied with WIC.ConclusionsFindings offer considerations for addressing WIC access and satisfaction. WIC design and implementation should focus on barriers to access for Black households and improving overall satisfaction with WIC among rural and low-income households.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3795721251323312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721251323312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is a federal nutrition assistance program aiming to address food insecurity and improve health. Participation varies across marginalized groups (eg, Black, Hispanic, low-income, rural), likely due to WIC access barriers and satisfaction, limiting WIC's impact on health disparities.ObjectiveAssess WIC access and satisfaction across marginalized groups to understand determinants of WIC participation in Missouri, where food insecurity is high (11% overall, 12% Hispanic, 26% Black) and WIC participation low (41%).MethodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the Missouri WIC Experience Survey (April 2022-June 2022). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression assessed access (eg, clinic wait times, clinic hours, clinic location) and satisfaction (eg, nutrition education, meeting dietary needs, shopping experience) across race/ethnicity, income, and urbanicity.ResultsThe sample (n = 2232) consisted of 69% White, 16% Black, and 8% Hispanic WIC-eligible households. Most had monthly incomes of $4000 or less (69%) and 32% lived in rural areas. Black households had 75% higher odds of experiencing barriers compared to White households. Compared to urban households, rural households experienced 30% lower odds of being satisfied overall with WIC, but 75% higher odds of being satisfied with WIC meeting dietary needs. Hispanic households had 85% higher odds than White households of being satisfied with WIC.ConclusionsFindings offer considerations for addressing WIC access and satisfaction. WIC design and implementation should focus on barriers to access for Black households and improving overall satisfaction with WIC among rural and low-income households.

妇女、婴儿和儿童(WIC)计划的获取和满意度:密苏里州居民中种族、民族、收入和城市化的差异。
妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划(WIC)是一项联邦营养援助计划,旨在解决粮食不安全问题和改善健康状况。边缘化群体(如黑人、西班牙裔、低收入、农村)的参与情况各不相同,这可能是由于妇女信息中心获取障碍和满意度,限制了妇女信息中心对健康差异的影响。评估边缘化群体的WIC获取和满意度,以了解密苏里州WIC参与的决定因素,密苏里州的粮食不安全程度高(总体为11%,西班牙裔为12%,黑人为26%),WIC参与度低(41%)。方法本横断面研究使用密苏里州WIC体验调查(2022年4月- 2022年6月)的数据。双变量和多变量logistic回归评估了不同种族/民族、收入和城市化的可及性(如诊所等待时间、诊所时间、诊所位置)和满意度(如营养教育、满足饮食需求、购物体验)。结果样本(n = 2232)包括69%的白人,16%的黑人和8%的西班牙裔符合wic的家庭。大多数人月收入在4000美元或以下(69%),32%生活在农村地区。黑人家庭遇到障碍的几率比白人家庭高75%。与城市家庭相比,农村家庭对WIC的总体满意率低30%,但对WIC满足饮食需求的满意率高75%。西班牙裔家庭对WIC满意的几率比白人家庭高85%。结论研究结果为解决WIC的可及性和满意度提供了参考。WIC的设计和实施应侧重于黑人家庭获得WIC的障碍,并提高农村和低收入家庭对WIC的总体满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Food and Nutrition Bulletin 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信