Is ductoplasty required following transoral sialolithotomy? - A case series.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Katie Holland, Jinnee U J Lee, Olga Gomeniouk, Grant S Owen, Richard Raad, Mihir Bhayani
{"title":"Is ductoplasty required following transoral sialolithotomy? - A case series.","authors":"Katie Holland, Jinnee U J Lee, Olga Gomeniouk, Grant S Owen, Richard Raad, Mihir Bhayani","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09324-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine if there was a difference in postoperative outcomes and complications between patients who underwent traditional two-layer closure (ductoplasty and floor of mouth) after Wharton's duct sialolithatomy during hybrid sialendoscopy compared to those who underwent single layer closure of only the floor of mouth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case series of a single surgeon's patients who underwent hybrid sialendoscopy at an urban tertiary care hospital. Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative information was collected from patients who underwent hybrid sialendoscopy with transoral sialolithotomy of Wharton's duct from 2020 to 2023. Data included salivary glands explored, intraoperative complications, ductal repair, postoperative complications, and recurrence of salivary symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 patients underwent hybrid sialendoscopy. Of those, 28.1% (n = 9) underwent traditional two-layer closure, and in 71.9% (n = 23) had single layer closure. 2.6% (n = 1) had a postoperative infection. There were no immediate postoperative complications reported in those with single layer closure. There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (p = 0.10). In patients with follow up, 86.7% of (n = 13) patients had documented salivary flow through the natural papilla after one layer closure compared to 80% (n = 4) in the two-layer group. There was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study support that single layer closure without ductoplasty after hybrid sialendoscopy allows for ductal recanalization and may produce the same postoperative outcomes as traditional two-layer closure while increasing operative efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09324-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine if there was a difference in postoperative outcomes and complications between patients who underwent traditional two-layer closure (ductoplasty and floor of mouth) after Wharton's duct sialolithatomy during hybrid sialendoscopy compared to those who underwent single layer closure of only the floor of mouth.

Methods: Retrospective case series of a single surgeon's patients who underwent hybrid sialendoscopy at an urban tertiary care hospital. Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative information was collected from patients who underwent hybrid sialendoscopy with transoral sialolithotomy of Wharton's duct from 2020 to 2023. Data included salivary glands explored, intraoperative complications, ductal repair, postoperative complications, and recurrence of salivary symptoms.

Results: 32 patients underwent hybrid sialendoscopy. Of those, 28.1% (n = 9) underwent traditional two-layer closure, and in 71.9% (n = 23) had single layer closure. 2.6% (n = 1) had a postoperative infection. There were no immediate postoperative complications reported in those with single layer closure. There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (p = 0.10). In patients with follow up, 86.7% of (n = 13) patients had documented salivary flow through the natural papilla after one layer closure compared to 80% (n = 4) in the two-layer group. There was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.72).

Conclusions: The results of this study support that single layer closure without ductoplasty after hybrid sialendoscopy allows for ductal recanalization and may produce the same postoperative outcomes as traditional two-layer closure while increasing operative efficiency.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信