Self-rated physical fitness predicts cardiovascular and all-cause mortality - implications for clinical decision-making.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Angela P Moissl, Graciela E Delgado, Marcus E Kleber, Frank C Mooren, Hendrik Schäfer, Bernhard K Krämer, Winfried März, Boris Schmitz
{"title":"Self-rated physical fitness predicts cardiovascular and all-cause mortality - implications for clinical decision-making.","authors":"Angela P Moissl, Graciela E Delgado, Marcus E Kleber, Frank C Mooren, Hendrik Schäfer, Bernhard K Krämer, Winfried März, Boris Schmitz","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study investigated the association between self-reported physical fitness (SRPF) and mortality in 3,248 participants of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study with a mean follow-up of 9.9 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SRPF was inquired using an 11-point Likert scale on a paper-pencil questionnaire at enrolment and we defined five distinct classes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to investigate the association with mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with higher baseline SRPF had a significantly lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Regarding cardiovascular mortality, participants in the highest SRPF class had the lowest risk with a hazard ratio HR 0.14 (95% CI 0.08-0.24) compared to the lowest SRPF class. These associations remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), smoking, and other confounders, including comorbidities. Similar results were seen in both participants with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD, n=2583, 78%) and those without CAD (n=733; 22%). Higher SRPF was associated with significantly lower systolic blood pressure and resting heart rate as well as lower HbA1c, fasting glucose, serum uric acid and lower inflammatory markers such as hs-CRP, IL-6, and SAA. Conversely, a higher SRPF was associated with higher Apolipoprotein A-2 and HDL-cholesterol concentrations (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research shows that SRPF is a strong predictor of overall and cardiovascular mortality for individuals with and without CAD. This suggests that SRPF should be part of routine medical check-ups, highlighting the importance of promoting physical activity for cardiovascular health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The study investigated the association between self-reported physical fitness (SRPF) and mortality in 3,248 participants of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study with a mean follow-up of 9.9 years.

Methods: SRPF was inquired using an 11-point Likert scale on a paper-pencil questionnaire at enrolment and we defined five distinct classes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to investigate the association with mortality.

Results: Participants with higher baseline SRPF had a significantly lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Regarding cardiovascular mortality, participants in the highest SRPF class had the lowest risk with a hazard ratio HR 0.14 (95% CI 0.08-0.24) compared to the lowest SRPF class. These associations remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), smoking, and other confounders, including comorbidities. Similar results were seen in both participants with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD, n=2583, 78%) and those without CAD (n=733; 22%). Higher SRPF was associated with significantly lower systolic blood pressure and resting heart rate as well as lower HbA1c, fasting glucose, serum uric acid and lower inflammatory markers such as hs-CRP, IL-6, and SAA. Conversely, a higher SRPF was associated with higher Apolipoprotein A-2 and HDL-cholesterol concentrations (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Our research shows that SRPF is a strong predictor of overall and cardiovascular mortality for individuals with and without CAD. This suggests that SRPF should be part of routine medical check-ups, highlighting the importance of promoting physical activity for cardiovascular health.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信