An international modified Delphi consensus study on the optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with HFpEF.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2480736
A Sindone, M Abdelhamid, W Almahmeed, J A de Figueiredo Neto, A Jordan-Rios, Y Lopatin, H Sümbül, J C Youn, C E Chiang
{"title":"An international modified Delphi consensus study on the optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with HFpEF.","authors":"A Sindone, M Abdelhamid, W Almahmeed, J A de Figueiredo Neto, A Jordan-Rios, Y Lopatin, H Sümbül, J C Youn, C E Chiang","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2480736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The global burden of HFpEF is high and, despite developments in available therapies, patient outcomes have not improved significantly. This study aimed to explore the optimal approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with HFpEF and to develop recommendations on how guideline directed medical therapy can be introduced in a more equitable and universal manner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a modified Delphi methodology led by an independent facilitator, a steering group of healthcare practitioners with experience of managing HFpEF identified 41 Likert scale statements across five main domains of focus. This generated an online survey distributed by a third-party provider using a convenience sampling approach to HCPs with experience managing patients with HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 213 responses were analyzed with 35/41 statements attaining very strong (≥90%) agreement, 4/41 strong (≥75%) agreement, and 2/41 failing to meet the threshold established for consensus (75%). From these results, a total of 8 recommendations to define the optimal approach to diagnosis and treatment of patients with HFpEF are proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The burden of HFpEF is set to increase in the future. The high levels of consensus achieved in this study show that there is willingness to implement change and improve patient outcomes for those with this condition. A series of actionable recommendations have been developed based on the levels of agreement attained. It is hoped that the putting the current recommendations into practice will support international efforts to improve HFpEF care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"385-395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2480736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The global burden of HFpEF is high and, despite developments in available therapies, patient outcomes have not improved significantly. This study aimed to explore the optimal approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with HFpEF and to develop recommendations on how guideline directed medical therapy can be introduced in a more equitable and universal manner.

Methods: Using a modified Delphi methodology led by an independent facilitator, a steering group of healthcare practitioners with experience of managing HFpEF identified 41 Likert scale statements across five main domains of focus. This generated an online survey distributed by a third-party provider using a convenience sampling approach to HCPs with experience managing patients with HFpEF.

Results: A total of 213 responses were analyzed with 35/41 statements attaining very strong (≥90%) agreement, 4/41 strong (≥75%) agreement, and 2/41 failing to meet the threshold established for consensus (75%). From these results, a total of 8 recommendations to define the optimal approach to diagnosis and treatment of patients with HFpEF are proposed.

Conclusion: The burden of HFpEF is set to increase in the future. The high levels of consensus achieved in this study show that there is willingness to implement change and improve patient outcomes for those with this condition. A series of actionable recommendations have been developed based on the levels of agreement attained. It is hoped that the putting the current recommendations into practice will support international efforts to improve HFpEF care.

一项关于HFpEF患者最佳诊断和治疗的国际修正Delphi共识研究。
目的:HFpEF的全球负担很高,尽管现有的治疗方法有所发展,但患者的预后并没有显著改善。本研究旨在探索诊断和治疗HFpEF患者的最佳方法,并就如何以更公平和普遍的方式引入指导医学治疗提出建议。方法:使用由独立促进者领导的改进的德尔菲方法,由具有管理HFpEF经验的医疗从业人员组成的指导小组确定了跨越五个主要重点领域的41个李克特量表陈述。这产生了一个在线调查,由第三方供应商使用方便的抽样方法分发给具有管理HFpEF患者经验的hcp。结果:共有213份回复被分析,35/41的陈述达到非常强(≥90%)的一致性,4/41的陈述达到强(≥75%)的一致性,2/41的陈述没有达到一致的阈值(75%)。根据这些结果,我们提出了8项建议,以确定HFpEF患者的最佳诊断和治疗方法。结论:HFpEF的负担将在未来增加。在这项研究中达成的高度共识表明,有意愿实施改变并改善患有这种疾病的患者预后。已根据达成的协议程度拟订了一系列可采取行动的建议。希望将目前的建议付诸实践将支持改善HFpEF护理的国际努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信