Type 2 inflammation, a common denominator in chronic airway disease?

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001159
Michaela Schedel, Victoria Heimel, Christian Taube
{"title":"Type 2 inflammation, a common denominator in chronic airway disease?","authors":"Michaela Schedel, Victoria Heimel, Christian Taube","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review addresses the growing understanding that a specific subset of patients with a respiratory disease, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or bronchiectasis may have one thing in common: type 2 inflammation. In the era of personalized medicine, we need to refine clinical markers combined with molecular and cellular endotyping to improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent literature reveals that type 2 markers such as blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and immunglobulin E (IgE), can provide valuable insights into disease progression, exacerbation risk, and treatment response, but their stability remains to be investigated. Treating asthma and COPD patients with biologics to target IL-4/IL-13, IL-5, and alarmins have shown potential, although efficacy varied. In bronchiectasis, a subset of patients with type 2 inflammation may benefit from corticosteroid therapy, despite broader concerns regarding its use.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This underscores the importance of improved disease endotyping to better characterize patients who may benefit from targeted therapies. In clinical practice, personalized treatment based on inflammatory profiles has been shown to improve outcomes in heterogeneous lung diseases. Future research needs to focus on validating reliable biomarkers and optimizing clinical trial designs to advance therapeutic strategies in respiratory diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"302-309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review addresses the growing understanding that a specific subset of patients with a respiratory disease, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or bronchiectasis may have one thing in common: type 2 inflammation. In the era of personalized medicine, we need to refine clinical markers combined with molecular and cellular endotyping to improve patient outcomes.

Recent findings: Recent literature reveals that type 2 markers such as blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and immunglobulin E (IgE), can provide valuable insights into disease progression, exacerbation risk, and treatment response, but their stability remains to be investigated. Treating asthma and COPD patients with biologics to target IL-4/IL-13, IL-5, and alarmins have shown potential, although efficacy varied. In bronchiectasis, a subset of patients with type 2 inflammation may benefit from corticosteroid therapy, despite broader concerns regarding its use.

Summary: This underscores the importance of improved disease endotyping to better characterize patients who may benefit from targeted therapies. In clinical practice, personalized treatment based on inflammatory profiles has been shown to improve outcomes in heterogeneous lung diseases. Future research needs to focus on validating reliable biomarkers and optimizing clinical trial designs to advance therapeutic strategies in respiratory diseases.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信