Negative posttraumatic cognitions and cognitive emotion regulation strategies as predictors of PTSD symptom change during an intensive outpatient program for PTSD.

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jonathan W Murphy, Marley Warren, Dale L Smith, Sarah Pridgen, Philip Held
{"title":"Negative posttraumatic cognitions and cognitive emotion regulation strategies as predictors of PTSD symptom change during an intensive outpatient program for PTSD.","authors":"Jonathan W Murphy, Marley Warren, Dale L Smith, Sarah Pridgen, Philip Held","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2481312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Negative posttraumatic cognitions (NPCs) and cognitive emotion regulation (CER) strategies have both been proposed as predictors of change in evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, they are rarely studied simultaneously, with only one study examining these predictors in a randomized clinical trial of prolonged exposure therapy. It remains to be tested how these variables predict improvements in PTSD severity in real world clinical settings or different delivery formats. Data from 487 military service members and veterans that participated in a 2-week nonrandomized, uncontrolled cognitive processing therapy-based intensive treatment program (ITP) for PTSD were used to evaluate NPCs and CER strategies as predictors of improvements in PTSD severity. Results showed that, in a model with both predictors, decreases in self-focused NPCs, world-focused NPCs, and catastrophizing (CER strategy) were associated with reductions in PTSD severity during treatment and at follow-up. However, these effects were small (<i>R</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> ranging from .005 to.04) relative to reductions in depression severity (<i>R2 =</i> .40). Although NPCs and CER strategies significantly predicted reductions in PTSD severity, their overall impact was relatively small in this nonrandomized, uncontrolled ITP. Future research should continue to investigate these and other predictors in a variety of treatment settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2481312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Negative posttraumatic cognitions (NPCs) and cognitive emotion regulation (CER) strategies have both been proposed as predictors of change in evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, they are rarely studied simultaneously, with only one study examining these predictors in a randomized clinical trial of prolonged exposure therapy. It remains to be tested how these variables predict improvements in PTSD severity in real world clinical settings or different delivery formats. Data from 487 military service members and veterans that participated in a 2-week nonrandomized, uncontrolled cognitive processing therapy-based intensive treatment program (ITP) for PTSD were used to evaluate NPCs and CER strategies as predictors of improvements in PTSD severity. Results showed that, in a model with both predictors, decreases in self-focused NPCs, world-focused NPCs, and catastrophizing (CER strategy) were associated with reductions in PTSD severity during treatment and at follow-up. However, these effects were small (R2 ranging from .005 to.04) relative to reductions in depression severity (R2 = .40). Although NPCs and CER strategies significantly predicted reductions in PTSD severity, their overall impact was relatively small in this nonrandomized, uncontrolled ITP. Future research should continue to investigate these and other predictors in a variety of treatment settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信