Social media use and the relationship with colorectal cancer screening among foreign-born populations in the United States.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Causes & Control Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s10552-025-01985-6
Joseph Atarere, Eugene Annor, Mariah Malak Bilalaga, Olachi Egbo, Greeshma N Gaddipati, Ramya Vasireddy, Boniface Mensah, Lewis Roberts
{"title":"Social media use and the relationship with colorectal cancer screening among foreign-born populations in the United States.","authors":"Joseph Atarere, Eugene Annor, Mariah Malak Bilalaga, Olachi Egbo, Greeshma N Gaddipati, Ramya Vasireddy, Boniface Mensah, Lewis Roberts","doi":"10.1007/s10552-025-01985-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media (SM) has emerged as a tool for health-related usage among US adults, including cancer screening promotion. Here, we aimed to assess the differences in health-related SM use between US and foreign-born adults and the relationship between health-related SM use and colorectal (CRC) screening practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the fifth edition of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5), cycle 2, we compared the differences in health-related SM use between US and foreign-born adults and the effects of SM use on CRC screening by country of birth. We included adults aged 50-75 and excluded participants with a history of CRC. The primary endpoint was CRC screening, which was determined by self-reported CRC screening using colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or stool occult blood testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 1,812 adults, of whom 236 (13.0%) were foreign-born. Most participants (72.1%) reported undergoing CRC screening. Interestingly, we found no discernible difference in health-related SM use [odds ratio [OR] 0.91; 95% CI (0.49, 1.69)] between US and foreign-born adults. Furthermore, our analysis revealed that SM use did not influence CRC screening practices among either group (US-born: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.50, 1.52], foreign-born 0.52 [0.10, 2.51]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrary to previous studies, which showed a positive relationship between SM use and satisfactory health-related practices, we found that although foreign-born adults use SM as much as US-born adults, there was no significant relationship between SM use and CRC screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":"845-851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01985-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media (SM) has emerged as a tool for health-related usage among US adults, including cancer screening promotion. Here, we aimed to assess the differences in health-related SM use between US and foreign-born adults and the relationship between health-related SM use and colorectal (CRC) screening practices.

Methods: Using data from the fifth edition of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5), cycle 2, we compared the differences in health-related SM use between US and foreign-born adults and the effects of SM use on CRC screening by country of birth. We included adults aged 50-75 and excluded participants with a history of CRC. The primary endpoint was CRC screening, which was determined by self-reported CRC screening using colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or stool occult blood testing.

Results: Our study included 1,812 adults, of whom 236 (13.0%) were foreign-born. Most participants (72.1%) reported undergoing CRC screening. Interestingly, we found no discernible difference in health-related SM use [odds ratio [OR] 0.91; 95% CI (0.49, 1.69)] between US and foreign-born adults. Furthermore, our analysis revealed that SM use did not influence CRC screening practices among either group (US-born: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.50, 1.52], foreign-born 0.52 [0.10, 2.51]).

Conclusion: Contrary to previous studies, which showed a positive relationship between SM use and satisfactory health-related practices, we found that although foreign-born adults use SM as much as US-born adults, there was no significant relationship between SM use and CRC screening.

在美国的外国出生人群中,社交媒体的使用与结直肠癌筛查的关系。
背景:社交媒体(SM)已成为美国成年人健康相关使用的工具,包括促进癌症筛查。在这里,我们的目的是评估美国和外国出生的成年人在健康相关的SM使用方面的差异,以及健康相关的SM使用与结直肠癌(CRC)筛查之间的关系。方法:使用来自美国国家癌症研究所健康信息国家趋势调查(提示5)第5版第2周期的数据,我们比较了美国和外国出生的成年人在健康相关的SM使用方面的差异,以及SM使用对出生国家结直肠癌筛查的影响。我们纳入了50-75岁的成年人,排除了有CRC病史的参与者。主要终点是CRC筛查,这是通过使用结肠镜检查、乙状结肠镜检查或粪便隐血检查自我报告的CRC筛查来确定的。结果:我们的研究包括1812名成年人,其中236人(13.0%)在国外出生。大多数参与者(72.1%)报告接受了CRC筛查。有趣的是,我们发现与健康相关的SM使用没有明显差异[比值比[OR] 0.91;95% CI(0.49, 1.69)]在美国和外国出生的成年人之间。此外,我们的分析显示,SM的使用对两组的CRC筛查没有影响(美国出生的:0.88 [95% CI: 0.50, 1.52],外国出生的0.52[0.10,2.51])。结论:与先前的研究相反,我们发现尽管外国出生的成年人使用SM与美国出生的成年人一样多,但SM使用与CRC筛查之间没有显着关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信