Decoding the impact of negative physical self-perception on inhibitory control ability from theta and beta rhythms.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Junwei Lian, Jiaqi Guo, Xu Dai, Xia Deng, Yong Liu, Jia Zhao, Xu Lei
{"title":"Decoding the impact of negative physical self-perception on inhibitory control ability from theta and beta rhythms.","authors":"Junwei Lian, Jiaqi Guo, Xu Dai, Xia Deng, Yong Liu, Jia Zhao, Xu Lei","doi":"10.1093/cercor/bhaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have found inhibitory control differences between obese individuals and those of normal weight. However, some normal-weight individuals with high negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale show restrictive eating behaviors and attentional bias toward high-calorie food, potentially influencing these differences. We collected behavioral and electroencephalography data using a novel inhibitory control task. Results showed that individuals with high negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale exhibited significantly greater restraint eating behavior compared to controls. Both theta and beta power differed between groups, with higher theta power in the high negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale group than in the obese group and more negative beta power in the high negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale group compared to both other groups. Theta power was greater in no-go than go conditions, while beta power was more negative in response to high-calorie versus low-calorie food stimuli. Importantly, theta power successfully decoded go/no-go conditions across all groups using multivariate pattern analysis, while beta power distinguished these conditions only in the negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale and control groups. These findings suggest that theta and beta power, along with multivariate pattern analysis, can reliably distinguish inhibitory control ability among the three groups, highlighting the importance of considering negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale when assessing inhibitory control differences between normal-weight and obese individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9715,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have found inhibitory control differences between obese individuals and those of normal weight. However, some normal-weight individuals with high negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale show restrictive eating behaviors and attentional bias toward high-calorie food, potentially influencing these differences. We collected behavioral and electroencephalography data using a novel inhibitory control task. Results showed that individuals with high negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale exhibited significantly greater restraint eating behavior compared to controls. Both theta and beta power differed between groups, with higher theta power in the high negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale group than in the obese group and more negative beta power in the high negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale group compared to both other groups. Theta power was greater in no-go than go conditions, while beta power was more negative in response to high-calorie versus low-calorie food stimuli. Importantly, theta power successfully decoded go/no-go conditions across all groups using multivariate pattern analysis, while beta power distinguished these conditions only in the negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale and control groups. These findings suggest that theta and beta power, along with multivariate pattern analysis, can reliably distinguish inhibitory control ability among the three groups, highlighting the importance of considering negative physical self-perception on the fatness subscale when assessing inhibitory control differences between normal-weight and obese individuals.

从θ和β节律解读消极身体自我知觉对抑制控制能力的影响。
先前的研究已经发现肥胖个体和正常体重个体的抑制控制存在差异。然而,一些正常体重的个体在肥胖亚量表上表现出高度消极的身体自我感知,表现出限制性饮食行为和对高热量食物的注意偏见,这可能会影响这些差异。我们使用一种新的抑制控制任务收集行为和脑电图数据。结果表明,与对照组相比,在肥胖子量表上具有高负面身体自我知觉的个体表现出更大的克制性饮食行为。两组之间的θ和β功率均有差异,肥胖子量表组中高负性身体自我知觉组的θ功率高于肥胖组,而肥胖子量表组中高负性身体自我知觉组的β功率高于其他两组。在不吃的情况下,θ能量比吃的情况下更大,而在高热量食物刺激和低热量食物刺激下,β能量更负。重要的是,通过多变量模式分析,theta功率成功地解码了所有组的go/no-go条件,而beta功率仅在肥胖子量表和对照组的消极身体自我感知中区分了这些条件。这些发现表明,theta和beta功率以及多变量模式分析可以可靠地区分三组之间的抑制控制能力,强调在评估正常体重和肥胖个体之间的抑制控制差异时,考虑肥胖亚量表上的消极身体自我感知的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebral cortex
Cerebral cortex 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
510
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cerebral Cortex publishes papers on the development, organization, plasticity, and function of the cerebral cortex, including the hippocampus. Studies with clear relevance to the cerebral cortex, such as the thalamocortical relationship or cortico-subcortical interactions, are also included. The journal is multidisciplinary and covers the large variety of modern neurobiological and neuropsychological techniques, including anatomy, biochemistry, molecular neurobiology, electrophysiology, behavior, artificial intelligence, and theoretical modeling. In addition to research articles, special features such as brief reviews, book reviews, and commentaries are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信