Effect of environmental conditions on wear resistance of lithium silicate glass-ceramic materials.

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ahmad Amro Baradee, Benedikt Christopher Spies, Severin Rothlauf, Kirstin Vach, Michael Seidenstuecker, Jörg Lüchtenborg
{"title":"Effect of environmental conditions on wear resistance of lithium silicate glass-ceramic materials.","authors":"Ahmad Amro Baradee, Benedikt Christopher Spies, Severin Rothlauf, Kirstin Vach, Michael Seidenstuecker, Jörg Lüchtenborg","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the impact of neutral and acidic environments on wear resistance of lithium silicate glass-ceramics (LSGCs), with and without crystallization firing after manufacturing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-six specimens were tested in a two-body wear simulator and divided into seven groups. Four groups consisted of commercially available LSGC materials, each opposed to steatite antagonists. A fifth group included an LSGC material tested additionally in its fired state. A sixth group involved another LSGC material opposed to zirconia antagonists. A seventh group comprised zirconia specimens, opposed to steatite antagonists. All specimens underwent a two-body wear test with 250,000 cycles, a 5 kg load, and 1 mm lateral movement, while immersed in either neutral (pH 7) or acidic (pH 3) buffer solutions. Laser scanning microscopy, optical profilometry, and scanning electron microscopy were used to quantify and/or investigate the wear. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LSGC materials exhibited significantly higher wear at pH 7 compared to pH 3 (p < 0.001). The greatest volume loss was observed in an unfired LSGC material (0.138 ± 0.039 mm³ at pH 3 vs. 0.495 ± 0.092 mm³ at pH 7). Steatite antagonists also suffered significantly greater wear at pH 7, with the highest antagonist wear recorded at 1.718 ± 0.068 mm³ . The wear mechanism caused by steatite antagonists differed from zirconia antagonists.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Environmental conditions play a major role in the wear performance of LSGCs. Fully crystallized LSGC materials show similar susceptibility to environmental changes compared to LSGC materials requiring crystallization firing.</p>","PeriodicalId":298,"journal":{"name":"Dental Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2025.03.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the impact of neutral and acidic environments on wear resistance of lithium silicate glass-ceramics (LSGCs), with and without crystallization firing after manufacturing.

Materials and methods: Fifty-six specimens were tested in a two-body wear simulator and divided into seven groups. Four groups consisted of commercially available LSGC materials, each opposed to steatite antagonists. A fifth group included an LSGC material tested additionally in its fired state. A sixth group involved another LSGC material opposed to zirconia antagonists. A seventh group comprised zirconia specimens, opposed to steatite antagonists. All specimens underwent a two-body wear test with 250,000 cycles, a 5 kg load, and 1 mm lateral movement, while immersed in either neutral (pH 7) or acidic (pH 3) buffer solutions. Laser scanning microscopy, optical profilometry, and scanning electron microscopy were used to quantify and/or investigate the wear. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA.

Results: LSGC materials exhibited significantly higher wear at pH 7 compared to pH 3 (p < 0.001). The greatest volume loss was observed in an unfired LSGC material (0.138 ± 0.039 mm³ at pH 3 vs. 0.495 ± 0.092 mm³ at pH 7). Steatite antagonists also suffered significantly greater wear at pH 7, with the highest antagonist wear recorded at 1.718 ± 0.068 mm³ . The wear mechanism caused by steatite antagonists differed from zirconia antagonists.

Significance: Environmental conditions play a major role in the wear performance of LSGCs. Fully crystallized LSGC materials show similar susceptibility to environmental changes compared to LSGC materials requiring crystallization firing.

环境条件对硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷材料耐磨性的影响。
目的:比较中性和酸性环境对制造后有无结晶烧制的硅酸锂微晶玻璃(LSGCs)耐磨性的影响。材料与方法:56个试件在双体磨损模拟器上进行试验,分为7组。四组由市售的LSGC材料组成,每组与滑石拮抗剂相对立。第五组包括在燃烧状态下进行额外测试的LSGC材料。第六组涉及另一种与氧化锆拮抗剂相对立的LSGC材料。第七组由氧化锆标本组成,与滑石拮抗剂相对。所有试件均在中性(pH 7)或酸性(pH 3)缓冲溶液中浸泡,进行了25万次循环、5 kg载荷和1 mm横向移动的两体磨损试验。使用激光扫描显微镜、光学轮廓术和扫描电子显微镜来量化和/或研究磨损。数据分析采用单因素方差分析。结果:与pH值为3相比,pH值为7的LSGC材料表现出更高的磨损(p )。意义:环境条件对LSGC材料的磨损性能起主要作用。与需要结晶烧制的LSGC材料相比,完全结晶的LSGC材料对环境变化的敏感性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Materials
Dental Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Dental Materials publishes original research, review articles, and short communications. Academy of Dental Materials members click here to register for free access to Dental Materials online. The principal aim of Dental Materials is to promote rapid communication of scientific information between academia, industry, and the dental practitioner. Original Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research of basic and applied character which focus on the properties or performance of dental materials or the reaction of host tissues to materials are given priority publication. Other acceptable topics include application technology in clinical dentistry and dental laboratory technology. Comprehensive reviews and editorial commentaries on pertinent subjects will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信