Assessment and Management of Concurrent Substance Use in Patients Receiving Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depressive, Obsessive-Compulsive, Psychotic, and Trauma-Related Disorders: A Delphi Consensus Study and Guideline.

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Victor M Tang, Scott Aaronson, Mohamed Abdelghani, Chris Baeken, Tracy Barbour, André R Brunoni, Samuel Bulteau, Linda L Carpenter, Paul E Croarkin, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Paul B Fitzgerald, F Andrew Kozel, Bernard Le Foll, Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta, Yoshihiro Noda, Frank Padberg, Christian Plewnia, Hang Su, Philip van Eijndhoven, Eric van Exel, Iris van Oostrom, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Daphne Voineskos, Saydra Wilson, Daniel M Blumberger
{"title":"Assessment and Management of Concurrent Substance Use in Patients Receiving Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depressive, Obsessive-Compulsive, Psychotic, and Trauma-Related Disorders: A Delphi Consensus Study and Guideline.","authors":"Victor M Tang, Scott Aaronson, Mohamed Abdelghani, Chris Baeken, Tracy Barbour, André R Brunoni, Samuel Bulteau, Linda L Carpenter, Paul E Croarkin, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Paul B Fitzgerald, F Andrew Kozel, Bernard Le Foll, Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta, Yoshihiro Noda, Frank Padberg, Christian Plewnia, Hang Su, Philip van Eijndhoven, Eric van Exel, Iris van Oostrom, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Daphne Voineskos, Saydra Wilson, Daniel M Blumberger","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.20240403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited data are available to inform clinicians on how to manage concurrent substance use in the context of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of depressive, obsessive-compulsive, psychotic, or trauma-related disorders. The authors convened an international panel of 24 rTMS experts, representative of different geographic regions and subspecialities, and created a consensus guideline for clinicians and researchers on approaches to concurrent substance use in patients receiving rTMS as treatment for primary psychiatric disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi method survey and expert opinion elicited over consecutive rounds of surveys were used, with feedback and discussion after each round. Recommendation statements were established upon very high (≥80%) agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three rounds of surveys and feedback were sufficient to reach a consensus for most topics; where consensus could not be reached, the panel discussed limitations in the current evidence base. Informed by a synthesis of the literature and practice-based evidence, the expert panel provides several consensus recommendations on the topics of screening, monitoring, risk assessment, and mitigation associated with various degrees of substance use, and specific considerations for alcohol, cannabis, stimulants, and opioids. Instead of excluding all people who use substances, a nuanced approach should be taken based on an assessment of risk factors for clinical instability and severity of use. The most important safety risk with substance use is the presence of intoxication or withdrawal states, with the most data supporting seizure risk in unstable alcohol or nonmedical stimulant use. Although there is no evidence of reduced rTMS efficacy for a psychiatric disorder in the presence of concurrent substance use, the lack of data in this area warrants caution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These recommendations can be readily implemented clinically and provide a framework for future research. In patients receiving rTMS for a primary psychiatric disorder, assessment and management of co-occurring substance use is complex, requiring greater attention, standardization, and further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7656,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"appiajp20240403"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20240403","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Limited data are available to inform clinicians on how to manage concurrent substance use in the context of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of depressive, obsessive-compulsive, psychotic, or trauma-related disorders. The authors convened an international panel of 24 rTMS experts, representative of different geographic regions and subspecialities, and created a consensus guideline for clinicians and researchers on approaches to concurrent substance use in patients receiving rTMS as treatment for primary psychiatric disorders.

Methods: A Delphi method survey and expert opinion elicited over consecutive rounds of surveys were used, with feedback and discussion after each round. Recommendation statements were established upon very high (≥80%) agreement.

Results: Three rounds of surveys and feedback were sufficient to reach a consensus for most topics; where consensus could not be reached, the panel discussed limitations in the current evidence base. Informed by a synthesis of the literature and practice-based evidence, the expert panel provides several consensus recommendations on the topics of screening, monitoring, risk assessment, and mitigation associated with various degrees of substance use, and specific considerations for alcohol, cannabis, stimulants, and opioids. Instead of excluding all people who use substances, a nuanced approach should be taken based on an assessment of risk factors for clinical instability and severity of use. The most important safety risk with substance use is the presence of intoxication or withdrawal states, with the most data supporting seizure risk in unstable alcohol or nonmedical stimulant use. Although there is no evidence of reduced rTMS efficacy for a psychiatric disorder in the presence of concurrent substance use, the lack of data in this area warrants caution.

Conclusions: These recommendations can be readily implemented clinically and provide a framework for future research. In patients receiving rTMS for a primary psychiatric disorder, assessment and management of co-occurring substance use is complex, requiring greater attention, standardization, and further study.

接受反复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症、强迫症、精神病和创伤相关疾病患者并发物质使用的评估和管理:德尔菲共识研究和指南。
目的:有限的数据可以告知临床医生如何在重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗抑郁症、强迫症、精神病或创伤相关疾病的背景下管理并发物质使用。作者召集了一个由24位rTMS专家组成的国际小组,代表不同的地理区域和亚专业,并为临床医生和研究人员制定了一份共识指南,指导接受rTMS治疗的原发性精神疾病患者同时使用药物的方法。方法:采用德尔菲法进行问卷调查,并在连续几轮调查中征求专家意见,每轮调查结束后进行反馈讨论。建议声明建立在非常高(≥80%)的一致性基础上。结果:三轮调查和反馈足以对大多数主题达成共识;在无法达成共识的情况下,小组讨论了现有证据基础的局限性。专家小组综合了文献和基于实践的证据,就与不同程度的物质使用相关的筛查、监测、风险评估和缓解等主题,以及对酒精、大麻、兴奋剂和阿片类药物的具体考虑,提出了若干共识性建议。不应排除所有使用药物的人,而应根据对临床不稳定和使用严重程度的风险因素的评估,采取一种细致入微的方法。物质使用最重要的安全风险是存在中毒或戒断状态,大多数数据支持不稳定酒精或非医疗兴奋剂使用的癫痫发作风险。虽然没有证据表明同时使用药物会降低rTMS对精神疾病的疗效,但该领域数据的缺乏值得谨慎。结论:这些建议可以很容易地在临床上实施,并为未来的研究提供了一个框架。在接受rTMS治疗原发性精神障碍的患者中,评估和管理同时发生的物质使用是复杂的,需要更多的关注、标准化和进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Psychiatry, dedicated to keeping psychiatry vibrant and relevant, publishes the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. The journal covers the full spectrum of issues related to mental health diagnoses and treatment, presenting original articles on new developments in diagnosis, treatment, neuroscience, and patient populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信