Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Chitogel Versus PureRegen Gel on Postoperative Outcomes from Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Marina N Cavada, Michael Fook-Ho Lee, Arjuna Ananda, Raymond Sacks, Yuresh S Naidoo
{"title":"Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Chitogel Versus PureRegen Gel on Postoperative Outcomes from Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.","authors":"Marina N Cavada, Michael Fook-Ho Lee, Arjuna Ananda, Raymond Sacks, Yuresh S Naidoo","doi":"10.1177/19458924251321142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study aims to compare Chitogel<sup>®</sup> with topical corticosteroid versus PureRegen<sup>®</sup> gel on wound healing and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.MethodsA double-blinded randomized controlled trial was performed with patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery who were prospectively recruited and randomized to receive Chitogel with triamcinolone to one side of the sinuses and PureRegen to the contralateral sinuses. The patients underwent endoscopic follow-up at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Patient factors including age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities (reflux, allergy, and asthma), and disease specific factor (chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype) were collected. Sinus ostial measurements, adhesions, mucopurulent discharge, edema, crusting, and granulation were assessed. A visual analogue scale questionnaire on quality of life was assessed in each follow-up appointment.ResultsA total of 40 patients were randomized. At 12 weeks, Chitogel had a 10.7 mm<sup>2</sup> reduction in frontal sinus ostium area compared to 15 mm<sup>2</sup> in the PureRegen group; Chitogel had a 2.2 mm<sup>2</sup> increase in maxillary ostium area compared to 0.1 mm<sup>2</sup> in the PureRegen group; Chitogel had a 27.6 mm<sup>2</sup> reduction in area of the sinus ostium compared to 28.7 mm<sup>2</sup> in the PureRegen group. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The difference between the two groups when analysing adhesion, mucopurulent discharge, mucosal oedema, crusting, granulation, and phenotype was not statistically significant. Patient self-directed grading on quality of life was not statistically significant.ConclusionBoth Chitogel with triamcinolone and PureRegen have demonstrated to be great options to prevent adhesion, stenosis, and optimize healing. There were no clinical and statistical differences between both products in wound healing and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"19458924251321142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251321142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aims to compare Chitogel® with topical corticosteroid versus PureRegen® gel on wound healing and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.MethodsA double-blinded randomized controlled trial was performed with patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery who were prospectively recruited and randomized to receive Chitogel with triamcinolone to one side of the sinuses and PureRegen to the contralateral sinuses. The patients underwent endoscopic follow-up at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Patient factors including age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities (reflux, allergy, and asthma), and disease specific factor (chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype) were collected. Sinus ostial measurements, adhesions, mucopurulent discharge, edema, crusting, and granulation were assessed. A visual analogue scale questionnaire on quality of life was assessed in each follow-up appointment.ResultsA total of 40 patients were randomized. At 12 weeks, Chitogel had a 10.7 mm2 reduction in frontal sinus ostium area compared to 15 mm2 in the PureRegen group; Chitogel had a 2.2 mm2 increase in maxillary ostium area compared to 0.1 mm2 in the PureRegen group; Chitogel had a 27.6 mm2 reduction in area of the sinus ostium compared to 28.7 mm2 in the PureRegen group. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The difference between the two groups when analysing adhesion, mucopurulent discharge, mucosal oedema, crusting, granulation, and phenotype was not statistically significant. Patient self-directed grading on quality of life was not statistically significant.ConclusionBoth Chitogel with triamcinolone and PureRegen have demonstrated to be great options to prevent adhesion, stenosis, and optimize healing. There were no clinical and statistical differences between both products in wound healing and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信