Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Chitogel Versus PureRegen Gel on Postoperative Outcomes from Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1177/19458924251321142
Marina N Cavada, Michael Fook-Ho Lee, Arjuna Ananda, Raymond Sacks, Yuresh S Naidoo
{"title":"Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Chitogel Versus PureRegen Gel on Postoperative Outcomes from Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.","authors":"Marina N Cavada, Michael Fook-Ho Lee, Arjuna Ananda, Raymond Sacks, Yuresh S Naidoo","doi":"10.1177/19458924251321142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study aims to compare Chitogel<sup>®</sup> with topical corticosteroid versus PureRegen<sup>®</sup> gel on wound healing and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.MethodsA double-blinded randomized controlled trial was performed with patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery who were prospectively recruited and randomized to receive Chitogel with triamcinolone to one side of the sinuses and PureRegen to the contralateral sinuses. The patients underwent endoscopic follow-up at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Patient factors including age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities (reflux, allergy, and asthma), and disease specific factor (chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype) were collected. Sinus ostial measurements, adhesions, mucopurulent discharge, edema, crusting, and granulation were assessed. A visual analogue scale questionnaire on quality of life was assessed in each follow-up appointment.ResultsA total of 40 patients were randomized. At 12 weeks, Chitogel had a 10.7 mm<sup>2</sup> reduction in frontal sinus ostium area compared to 15 mm<sup>2</sup> in the PureRegen group; Chitogel had a 2.2 mm<sup>2</sup> increase in maxillary ostium area compared to 0.1 mm<sup>2</sup> in the PureRegen group; Chitogel had a 27.6 mm<sup>2</sup> reduction in area of the sinus ostium compared to 28.7 mm<sup>2</sup> in the PureRegen group. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The difference between the two groups when analysing adhesion, mucopurulent discharge, mucosal oedema, crusting, granulation, and phenotype was not statistically significant. Patient self-directed grading on quality of life was not statistically significant.ConclusionBoth Chitogel with triamcinolone and PureRegen have demonstrated to be great options to prevent adhesion, stenosis, and optimize healing. There were no clinical and statistical differences between both products in wound healing and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"211-219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251321142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aims to compare Chitogel® with topical corticosteroid versus PureRegen® gel on wound healing and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.MethodsA double-blinded randomized controlled trial was performed with patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery who were prospectively recruited and randomized to receive Chitogel with triamcinolone to one side of the sinuses and PureRegen to the contralateral sinuses. The patients underwent endoscopic follow-up at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Patient factors including age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities (reflux, allergy, and asthma), and disease specific factor (chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype) were collected. Sinus ostial measurements, adhesions, mucopurulent discharge, edema, crusting, and granulation were assessed. A visual analogue scale questionnaire on quality of life was assessed in each follow-up appointment.ResultsA total of 40 patients were randomized. At 12 weeks, Chitogel had a 10.7 mm2 reduction in frontal sinus ostium area compared to 15 mm2 in the PureRegen group; Chitogel had a 2.2 mm2 increase in maxillary ostium area compared to 0.1 mm2 in the PureRegen group; Chitogel had a 27.6 mm2 reduction in area of the sinus ostium compared to 28.7 mm2 in the PureRegen group. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The difference between the two groups when analysing adhesion, mucopurulent discharge, mucosal oedema, crusting, granulation, and phenotype was not statistically significant. Patient self-directed grading on quality of life was not statistically significant.ConclusionBoth Chitogel with triamcinolone and PureRegen have demonstrated to be great options to prevent adhesion, stenosis, and optimize healing. There were no clinical and statistical differences between both products in wound healing and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.

双盲随机对照试验评价壳聚糖与普瑞根凝胶对内镜鼻窦手术术后预后的疗效。
目的:本研究旨在比较Chitogel®与外用皮质类固醇与PureRegen®凝胶治疗慢性鼻窦炎的伤口愈合和术后结果。方法采用双盲随机对照试验,前瞻性招募接受功能性鼻窦内窥镜手术的患者,随机分配一侧鼻窦使用Chitogel和曲安奈德酮,对侧鼻窦使用PureRegen。患者在术后2周、6周和12周接受内镜随访。收集患者因素,包括年龄、性别、吸烟状况、合并症(反流、过敏和哮喘)和疾病特异性因素(慢性鼻窦炎表型)。评估窦口测量、粘连、粘液脓性排出、水肿、结痂和肉芽。在每次随访中对生活质量进行视觉模拟问卷调查。结果共纳入40例患者。12周时,Chitogel使额窦口面积减少10.7 mm2,而PureRegen组减少15 mm2;与PureRegen组的0.1 mm2相比,Chitogel组上颌口面积增加了2.2 mm2;与PureRegen组的28.7 mm2相比,Chitogel组的窦口面积减少了27.6 mm2。然而,这些差异没有统计学意义。两组在粘连、粘液脓性分泌物、粘膜水肿、结痂、肉芽和表型分析上差异无统计学意义。患者自我指导的生活质量评分无统计学意义。结论壳聚糖与曲安奈德酮和普瑞根都是预防粘连、狭窄和优化愈合的好选择。两种产品在治疗慢性鼻窦炎的伤口愈合和术后结果方面没有临床和统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信