DSM-5 based algorithms for the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised for children ages 4-17 years.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Linnea A Lampinen, Shuting Zheng, Lindsay Olson, Vanessa H Bal, Audrey E Thurm, Amy N Esler, Stephen M Kanne, So Hyun Kim, Catherine Lord, China Parenteau, Kerri P Nowell, Jane E Roberts, Nicole Takahashi, Somer L Bishop
{"title":"DSM-5 based algorithms for the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised for children ages 4-17 years.","authors":"Linnea A Lampinen, Shuting Zheng, Lindsay Olson, Vanessa H Bal, Audrey E Thurm, Amy N Esler, Stephen M Kanne, So Hyun Kim, Catherine Lord, China Parenteau, Kerri P Nowell, Jane E Roberts, Nicole Takahashi, Somer L Bishop","doi":"10.1111/jcpp.14159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) is a caregiver interview that is widely used as part of the diagnostic assessment for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Few large-scale studies have reported the sensitivity and specificity of the ADI-R algorithms, which are based on DSM-IV Autistic Disorder criteria. Kim and Lord (Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2012, 42, 82) developed revised DSM-5-based toddler algorithms, which are only applicable to children under 4 years. The current study developed DSM-5-based algorithms for children ages 4-17 years and examined their performance compared to clinical diagnosis and to the original DSM-IV-based algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included 2,905 cases (2,144 ASD, 761 non-ASD) from clinical-research databanks. Children were clinically referred for ASD-related concerns or recruited for ASD-focused research projects, and their caregivers completed the ADI-R as part of a comprehensive diagnostic assessment. Items relevant to DSM-5 ASD criteria were selected for the new algorithms primarily based on their ability to discriminate ASD from non-ASD cases. Algorithms were created for individuals with and without reported use of phrase speech. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the fit of a DSM-5-based two-factor structure. ROC curve analyses examined the diagnostic accuracy of the revised algorithms compared to clinical diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-factor structure of the revised ADI-R algorithms showed adequate fit. Sensitivity of the original ADI-R algorithm ranged from 74% to 96%, and specificity ranged from 38% to 83%. The revised DSM-5-based algorithms performed similarly or better, with sensitivity ranging from 77% to 99% and specificity ranging from 71% to 92%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large sample aggregated from US clinical-research sites, the original ADI-R algorithm showed adequate diagnostic validity, with poorer specificity among individuals without phrase speech. The revised DSM-5-based algorithms introduced here performed comparably to the original algorithms, with improved specificity in individuals without phrase speech. These revised algorithms offer an alternative method for summarizing ASD symptoms in a DSM-5-compatible manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14159","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) is a caregiver interview that is widely used as part of the diagnostic assessment for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Few large-scale studies have reported the sensitivity and specificity of the ADI-R algorithms, which are based on DSM-IV Autistic Disorder criteria. Kim and Lord (Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2012, 42, 82) developed revised DSM-5-based toddler algorithms, which are only applicable to children under 4 years. The current study developed DSM-5-based algorithms for children ages 4-17 years and examined their performance compared to clinical diagnosis and to the original DSM-IV-based algorithms.

Methods: Participants included 2,905 cases (2,144 ASD, 761 non-ASD) from clinical-research databanks. Children were clinically referred for ASD-related concerns or recruited for ASD-focused research projects, and their caregivers completed the ADI-R as part of a comprehensive diagnostic assessment. Items relevant to DSM-5 ASD criteria were selected for the new algorithms primarily based on their ability to discriminate ASD from non-ASD cases. Algorithms were created for individuals with and without reported use of phrase speech. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the fit of a DSM-5-based two-factor structure. ROC curve analyses examined the diagnostic accuracy of the revised algorithms compared to clinical diagnosis.

Results: The two-factor structure of the revised ADI-R algorithms showed adequate fit. Sensitivity of the original ADI-R algorithm ranged from 74% to 96%, and specificity ranged from 38% to 83%. The revised DSM-5-based algorithms performed similarly or better, with sensitivity ranging from 77% to 99% and specificity ranging from 71% to 92%.

Conclusions: In this large sample aggregated from US clinical-research sites, the original ADI-R algorithm showed adequate diagnostic validity, with poorer specificity among individuals without phrase speech. The revised DSM-5-based algorithms introduced here performed comparably to the original algorithms, with improved specificity in individuals without phrase speech. These revised algorithms offer an alternative method for summarizing ASD symptoms in a DSM-5-compatible manner.

基于DSM-5的自闭症诊断访谈算法-修订4-17岁儿童。
背景:自闭症诊断访谈,修订版(ADI-R)是一种被广泛用于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)诊断评估的照顾者访谈。基于DSM-IV自闭症标准的ADI-R算法的敏感性和特异性很少有大规模研究报道。Kim和Lord (Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2012, 42,82)开发了修订版的基于dsm -5的幼儿算法,该算法仅适用于4岁以下的儿童。目前的研究开发了基于dsm -5的4-17岁儿童算法,并将其与临床诊断和原始的基于dsm - iv的算法进行了比较。方法:参与者从临床研究数据库中纳入2905例(2144例ASD, 761例非ASD)。儿童被临床转诊为asd相关问题,或被招募参加以asd为重点的研究项目,他们的护理人员完成ADI-R,作为综合诊断评估的一部分。新算法选择了与DSM-5 ASD标准相关的项目,主要基于它们区分ASD与非ASD病例的能力。算法是为有和没有使用短语语音的人创建的。验证性因子分析检验了基于dsm -5的双因子结构的拟合性。ROC曲线分析检验了修订后的算法与临床诊断的诊断准确性。结果:改进后的ADI-R算法的双因素结构具有较好的拟合性。原始ADI-R算法的灵敏度为74% ~ 96%,特异性为38% ~ 83%。修订后的基于dsm -5的算法表现相似或更好,灵敏度为77%至99%,特异性为71%至92%。结论:在这个来自美国临床研究站点的大样本中,原始的ADI-R算法显示出足够的诊断有效性,在没有短语语音的个体中特异性较差。本文介绍的基于dsm -5的改进算法与原始算法的表现相当,在没有短语语音的个体中具有更高的特异性。这些修订后的算法提供了一种替代方法,以dsm -5兼容的方式总结ASD症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (JCPP) is a highly regarded international publication that focuses on the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry. It is recognized for publishing top-tier, clinically relevant research across various disciplines related to these areas. JCPP has a broad global readership and covers a diverse range of topics, including: Epidemiology: Studies on the prevalence and distribution of mental health issues in children and adolescents. Diagnosis: Research on the identification and classification of childhood disorders. Treatments: Psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions for child and adolescent mental health. Behavior and Cognition: Studies on the behavioral and cognitive aspects of childhood disorders. Neuroscience and Neurobiology: Research on the neural and biological underpinnings of child mental health. Genetics: Genetic factors contributing to the development of childhood disorders. JCPP serves as a platform for integrating empirical research, clinical studies, and high-quality reviews from diverse perspectives, theoretical viewpoints, and disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach is a key feature of the journal, as it fosters a comprehensive understanding of child and adolescent mental health. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry is published 12 times a year and is affiliated with the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH), which supports the journal's mission to advance knowledge and practice in the field of child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信