Hybrid Reptile-Snake Optimizer Based Channel Selection for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Disease Detection

IF 4.9 3区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Digambar Puri, Pramod Kachare, Smith Khare, Ibrahim Al-Shourbaji, Abdoh Jabbari, Abdalla Alameen
{"title":"Hybrid Reptile-Snake Optimizer Based Channel Selection for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Disease Detection","authors":"Digambar Puri,&nbsp;Pramod Kachare,&nbsp;Smith Khare,&nbsp;Ibrahim Al-Shourbaji,&nbsp;Abdoh Jabbari,&nbsp;Abdalla Alameen","doi":"10.1007/s42235-024-00636-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The global incidence of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is on a swift rise. The Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals is an effective tool for the identification of AD and its initial Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) stage using machine learning models. Analysis of AD using EEG involves multi-channel analysis. However, the use of multiple channels may impact the classification performance due to data redundancy and complexity. In this work, a hybrid EEG channel selection is proposed using a combination of Reptile Search Algorithm and Snake Optimizer (RSO) for AD and MCI detection based on decomposition methods. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Low-Complexity Orthogonal Wavelet Filter Banks (LCOWFB), Variational Mode Decomposition, and discrete-wavelet transform decomposition techniques have been employed for subbands-based EEG analysis. We extracted thirty-four features from each subband of EEG signals. Finally, a hybrid RSO optimizer is compared with five individual metaheuristic algorithms for effective channel selection. The effectiveness of this model is assessed by two publicly accessible AD EEG datasets. An accuracy of <span>\\(99.22\\%\\)</span> was achieved for binary classification from RSO with EMD using 4 (out of 16) EEG channels. Moreover, the RSO with LCOWFBs obtained <span>\\(89.68\\%\\)</span> the average accuracy for three-class classification using 7 (out of 19) channels. The performance reveals that RSO performs better than individual Metaheuristic algorithms with <span>\\(60\\%\\)</span> fewer channels and improved accuracy of <span>\\(4\\%\\)</span> than existing AD detection techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","volume":"22 2","pages":"884 - 900"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42235-024-00636-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global incidence of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is on a swift rise. The Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals is an effective tool for the identification of AD and its initial Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) stage using machine learning models. Analysis of AD using EEG involves multi-channel analysis. However, the use of multiple channels may impact the classification performance due to data redundancy and complexity. In this work, a hybrid EEG channel selection is proposed using a combination of Reptile Search Algorithm and Snake Optimizer (RSO) for AD and MCI detection based on decomposition methods. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Low-Complexity Orthogonal Wavelet Filter Banks (LCOWFB), Variational Mode Decomposition, and discrete-wavelet transform decomposition techniques have been employed for subbands-based EEG analysis. We extracted thirty-four features from each subband of EEG signals. Finally, a hybrid RSO optimizer is compared with five individual metaheuristic algorithms for effective channel selection. The effectiveness of this model is assessed by two publicly accessible AD EEG datasets. An accuracy of \(99.22\%\) was achieved for binary classification from RSO with EMD using 4 (out of 16) EEG channels. Moreover, the RSO with LCOWFBs obtained \(89.68\%\) the average accuracy for three-class classification using 7 (out of 19) channels. The performance reveals that RSO performs better than individual Metaheuristic algorithms with \(60\%\) fewer channels and improved accuracy of \(4\%\) than existing AD detection techniques.

基于混合爬虫蛇优化器的通道选择增强阿尔茨海默病检测
阿尔茨海默病(AD)的全球发病率正在迅速上升。脑电图(EEG)信号是利用机器学习模型识别AD及其初始轻度认知障碍(MCI)阶段的有效工具。脑电分析AD涉及多通道分析。但是,由于数据冗余和复杂性,多通道的使用可能会影响分类性能。本文提出了一种结合爬行动物搜索算法(Reptile Search Algorithm)和蛇形优化器(Snake Optimizer, RSO)的混合EEG通道选择方法,用于基于分解方法的AD和MCI检测。经验模态分解(EMD)、低复杂度正交小波滤波器组(LCOWFB)、变分模态分解和离散小波变换分解技术已被用于基于子带的脑电分析。从脑电信号的每个子带提取34个特征。最后,将混合RSO优化器与五种单独的元启发式算法进行了有效信道选择的比较。该模型的有效性通过两个可公开访问的AD脑电图数据集进行评估。使用4(共16个)脑电通道对RSO与EMD进行二元分类,达到\(99.22\%\)的准确性。此外,使用LCOWFBs的RSO在19个通道中使用7个通道获得了\(89.68\%\)三级分类的平均准确率。性能表明,RSO比单个元启发式算法性能更好,\(60\%\)通道更少,\(4\%\)精度比现有的AD检测技术更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bionic Engineering
Journal of Bionic Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
162
审稿时长
10.0 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bionic Engineering (JBE) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers and reviews that apply the knowledge learned from nature and biological systems to solve concrete engineering problems. The topics that JBE covers include but are not limited to: Mechanisms, kinematical mechanics and control of animal locomotion, development of mobile robots with walking (running and crawling), swimming or flying abilities inspired by animal locomotion. Structures, morphologies, composition and physical properties of natural and biomaterials; fabrication of new materials mimicking the properties and functions of natural and biomaterials. Biomedical materials, artificial organs and tissue engineering for medical applications; rehabilitation equipment and devices. Development of bioinspired computation methods and artificial intelligence for engineering applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信