Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of base-isolated buildings incorporating SMA gap dampers for pounding mitigation

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Tianhao Yu , Bin Wang , Peng Chen , Theodore L. Karavasilis
{"title":"Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of base-isolated buildings incorporating SMA gap dampers for pounding mitigation","authors":"Tianhao Yu ,&nbsp;Bin Wang ,&nbsp;Peng Chen ,&nbsp;Theodore L. Karavasilis","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Moat wall (MW) pounding is prone to occurring in seismically base-isolated buildings equipped with insufficient isolation clearances due to architectural constraints, particularly during strong near-field earthquake excitations. When MW pounding occurs, the earthquake responses of the isolation layer and superstructure are significantly amplified. Hence, various hysteretic gap dampers (GDs) have been developed to exhibit additional stiffness and damping for pounding mitigation during strong earthquakes, while maintaining the isolation system’s performance during small-to-moderate earthquakes. However, the effectiveness of GDs may be compromised during immediate aftershocks or future earthquakes because of their limited self-centering (SC) capabilities. For this reason, this study develops SC GDs in an adaptive isolation system, aiming to achieve optimal response control in the isolation layer and superstructure during multiple strong earthquakes through incorporating shape memory alloy (SMA) and steel GDs. Different isolation systems were designed with various GDs, i.e., SMA-, steel-, and combined-GDs, to achieve the same maximum bearing deformation under maximum considered earthquakes for comparative investigations. Seismic fragility analyses are conducted to investigate the influence of GDs’ mechanical behavior on isolation effectiveness, considering mainshock–aftershock sequences. Fragility analysis results show that the designed GDs significantly reduce the probability of bearing damage compared to conventional MWs. The mechanical behavior of GDs remarkably affects the isolation performance of the adaptive isolation systems. Specifically, unlike the steel-GDs experienced unrecoverable cumulative damage, the SMA-GDs with excellent SC capability exhibit superior deformation mitigation, especially under aftershock conditions, while sacrificing higher exceedance probabilities of superstructural drifts, which is due to the inherent lower energy dissipation capability. The combined-GDs demonstrate optimal response control between the isolation layer and the superstructure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 120111"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moat wall (MW) pounding is prone to occurring in seismically base-isolated buildings equipped with insufficient isolation clearances due to architectural constraints, particularly during strong near-field earthquake excitations. When MW pounding occurs, the earthquake responses of the isolation layer and superstructure are significantly amplified. Hence, various hysteretic gap dampers (GDs) have been developed to exhibit additional stiffness and damping for pounding mitigation during strong earthquakes, while maintaining the isolation system’s performance during small-to-moderate earthquakes. However, the effectiveness of GDs may be compromised during immediate aftershocks or future earthquakes because of their limited self-centering (SC) capabilities. For this reason, this study develops SC GDs in an adaptive isolation system, aiming to achieve optimal response control in the isolation layer and superstructure during multiple strong earthquakes through incorporating shape memory alloy (SMA) and steel GDs. Different isolation systems were designed with various GDs, i.e., SMA-, steel-, and combined-GDs, to achieve the same maximum bearing deformation under maximum considered earthquakes for comparative investigations. Seismic fragility analyses are conducted to investigate the influence of GDs’ mechanical behavior on isolation effectiveness, considering mainshock–aftershock sequences. Fragility analysis results show that the designed GDs significantly reduce the probability of bearing damage compared to conventional MWs. The mechanical behavior of GDs remarkably affects the isolation performance of the adaptive isolation systems. Specifically, unlike the steel-GDs experienced unrecoverable cumulative damage, the SMA-GDs with excellent SC capability exhibit superior deformation mitigation, especially under aftershock conditions, while sacrificing higher exceedance probabilities of superstructural drifts, which is due to the inherent lower energy dissipation capability. The combined-GDs demonstrate optimal response control between the isolation layer and the superstructure.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信