Modelling anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste: From lab to full scale

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Tatiana Segura , Paul Zanoni , Ulysse Brémond , Constance Lucet--Bérille , Antoine Pradel , Renaud Escudié , Jean-Philippe Steyer
{"title":"Modelling anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste: From lab to full scale","authors":"Tatiana Segura ,&nbsp;Paul Zanoni ,&nbsp;Ulysse Brémond ,&nbsp;Constance Lucet--Bérille ,&nbsp;Antoine Pradel ,&nbsp;Renaud Escudié ,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Steyer","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biogas production through anaerobic digestion offers a promising alternative to address climate change. In this study, the ADM1 model was used to simulate the digestion of four different substrates: a mixture of rye and maize silage, a mixture of cow slurry and maize silage, cow slurry alone, and food waste. Furthermore, the determination of total solids (TS) content was integrated into the model. Based on experimental data from 5 L Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTR), ADM1 model parameters were calibrated for each substrate, primarily differing in hydrolysis and inhibition constants. These parameters, along with two additional sets of parameters from the literature, were subsequently applied in simulations to assess methane productivity, yield, and TS under increasing organic loading rates (OLR) for each substrate. Among the substrates, food waste showed the highest productivity, yield, and solids removal, while rye and maize silage substrate was the most unstable, with system failure at the lowest OLR (7 <span><math><mrow><mi>kgVS</mi><msup><mrow><mo>.</mo><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup><msup><mrow><mo>.</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>) compared to the other substrates. In addition, co-digestion of cow slurry and maize silage showed synergies between maize silage and cow slurry, achieving a productivity of 2.62 <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mn>3</mn></msup><mo>.</mo><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup><mo>.</mo><msup><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>. Moreover, the parameters determined for rye and maize silage mixture were further used to simulate a full-scale anaerobic digestion unit fed with rye and maize silage as substrate. A difference in volatile fatty acid accumulation was found between the lab- and full-scale systems, suggesting a possible better microbial adaptation to inhibitory factors in the full-scale system. Further investigation into inhibition effects is recommended to improve the predictive accuracy of the ADM1.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 114739"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25001382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biogas production through anaerobic digestion offers a promising alternative to address climate change. In this study, the ADM1 model was used to simulate the digestion of four different substrates: a mixture of rye and maize silage, a mixture of cow slurry and maize silage, cow slurry alone, and food waste. Furthermore, the determination of total solids (TS) content was integrated into the model. Based on experimental data from 5 L Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTR), ADM1 model parameters were calibrated for each substrate, primarily differing in hydrolysis and inhibition constants. These parameters, along with two additional sets of parameters from the literature, were subsequently applied in simulations to assess methane productivity, yield, and TS under increasing organic loading rates (OLR) for each substrate. Among the substrates, food waste showed the highest productivity, yield, and solids removal, while rye and maize silage substrate was the most unstable, with system failure at the lowest OLR (7 kgVS.m-3.d-1) compared to the other substrates. In addition, co-digestion of cow slurry and maize silage showed synergies between maize silage and cow slurry, achieving a productivity of 2.62 Nm3.m-3.d-1. Moreover, the parameters determined for rye and maize silage mixture were further used to simulate a full-scale anaerobic digestion unit fed with rye and maize silage as substrate. A difference in volatile fatty acid accumulation was found between the lab- and full-scale systems, suggesting a possible better microbial adaptation to inhibitory factors in the full-scale system. Further investigation into inhibition effects is recommended to improve the predictive accuracy of the ADM1.

Abstract Image

模拟农业废弃物的厌氧消化:从实验室到全尺寸
通过厌氧消化生产沼气为应对气候变化提供了一个有希望的替代方案。在本研究中,采用ADM1模型模拟四种不同基质的消化:黑麦和玉米青贮混合、牛浆和玉米青贮混合、牛浆单独和食物垃圾。此外,将总固形物(TS)含量的测定纳入模型。基于5l连续搅拌槽反应器(CSTR)的实验数据,对每种底物的ADM1模型参数进行了校准,主要是水解和抑制常数不同。这些参数以及文献中的另外两组参数随后被应用于模拟中,以评估每种基质在增加有机负荷率(OLR)下的甲烷生产力、产量和TS。其中,食物垃圾的生产效率、产量和固体去除率最高,而黑麦和玉米青贮基质最不稳定,OLR最低(7 kgvs .m-3 - d-1)。此外,牛浆与玉米青贮共消化表现出玉米青贮与牛浆之间的协同效应,产量达到2.62 Nm3.m-3.d-1。此外,还利用测定的黑麦和玉米青贮混合料参数,模拟了以黑麦和玉米青贮为底物的全尺寸厌氧消化装置。在实验室和全尺寸系统之间发现了挥发性脂肪酸积累的差异,这表明在全尺寸系统中可能有更好的微生物对抑制因子的适应。建议进一步研究抑制作用,以提高ADM1的预测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信