Understanding the impact of identity and socio-economic factors on the adoption of soil conservation practices: Empirical evidence from Australia

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Salini Khuraijam , Heidi Wechtler , Vaughan Higgins , Balaji Seshadri
{"title":"Understanding the impact of identity and socio-economic factors on the adoption of soil conservation practices: Empirical evidence from Australia","authors":"Salini Khuraijam ,&nbsp;Heidi Wechtler ,&nbsp;Vaughan Higgins ,&nbsp;Balaji Seshadri","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While intensifying agricultural practices have addressed rising food demands, it has also contributed to declining soil health. Existing studies often overlook the internal factors influencing decision-making, focusing solely on external socio-economic influences. This paper extends beyond a traditional economic utility maximising framework by incorporating an identity-based utility. It addresses this gap by investigating the joint impact of farmer identity, socio-economic factors, and perceived risk aversion on farmer adoption behaviour. Utilising a survey dataset of 494 Australian farmers, we employ principal component analysis to find three farmer identities: Productivist, Conservationist and Socially-conscious. These identities are subsequently incorporated into a multivariate probit model using an identity utility framework to examine their influence on the adoption of five distinct soil conservation practices. The results show that identity can independently affect farmers’ probability of adopting soil conservation practices. However, its effect varies across different types of soil conservation practices. Our findings highlight the importance of identity alongside established factors like risk aversion, rainfall patterns, age, and attendance of training and demonstrations in shaping farmer decisions about soil conservation practices. This research illuminates the crucial role of farmer identity in shaping soil conservation decision-making, complementing existing studies focused solely on external factors. Understanding this multi-faceted interplay will equip policy-makers and stakeholders with a more comprehensive framework to encourage sustainable agricultural practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 103636"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While intensifying agricultural practices have addressed rising food demands, it has also contributed to declining soil health. Existing studies often overlook the internal factors influencing decision-making, focusing solely on external socio-economic influences. This paper extends beyond a traditional economic utility maximising framework by incorporating an identity-based utility. It addresses this gap by investigating the joint impact of farmer identity, socio-economic factors, and perceived risk aversion on farmer adoption behaviour. Utilising a survey dataset of 494 Australian farmers, we employ principal component analysis to find three farmer identities: Productivist, Conservationist and Socially-conscious. These identities are subsequently incorporated into a multivariate probit model using an identity utility framework to examine their influence on the adoption of five distinct soil conservation practices. The results show that identity can independently affect farmers’ probability of adopting soil conservation practices. However, its effect varies across different types of soil conservation practices. Our findings highlight the importance of identity alongside established factors like risk aversion, rainfall patterns, age, and attendance of training and demonstrations in shaping farmer decisions about soil conservation practices. This research illuminates the crucial role of farmer identity in shaping soil conservation decision-making, complementing existing studies focused solely on external factors. Understanding this multi-faceted interplay will equip policy-makers and stakeholders with a more comprehensive framework to encourage sustainable agricultural practices.
了解身份和社会经济因素对采用土壤保持措施的影响:来自澳大利亚的经验证据
虽然加强农业实践解决了不断增长的粮食需求,但也导致土壤健康状况下降。现有的研究往往忽视了影响决策的内部因素,只关注外部社会经济影响。本文通过纳入基于身份的效用,超越了传统的经济效用最大化框架。它通过调查农民身份、社会经济因素和感知风险厌恶对农民收养行为的共同影响来解决这一差距。利用对494名澳大利亚农民的调查数据集,我们采用主成分分析来找到三种农民身份:生产主义者,保护主义者和社会意识。这些特性随后被纳入一个多变量概率模型,使用一个特性效用框架来检查它们对采用五种不同土壤保持做法的影响。结果表明,身份可以独立影响农民采取土壤保持措施的概率。然而,其效果在不同类型的土壤保持措施中有所不同。我们的研究结果强调了身份的重要性,以及风险规避、降雨模式、年龄、参加培训和示范等既定因素在塑造农民关于土壤保持实践的决策方面的重要性。该研究阐明了农民身份在形成土壤保持决策中的关键作用,补充了仅关注外部因素的现有研究。了解这种多方面的相互作用将使决策者和利益攸关方有一个更全面的框架来鼓励可持续农业做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信