From distance(s) to civilization(s): (Extra)terrestrial intelligence(s) of (post-) Soviet Armenian astronomy

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Gabriela Radulescu
{"title":"From distance(s) to civilization(s): (Extra)terrestrial intelligence(s) of (post-) Soviet Armenian astronomy","authors":"Gabriela Radulescu","doi":"10.1177/03063127251324659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws on post-positivist conceptualizations of distance in human geography to look at how Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO) astronomers identified with an ancient scientific-cultural legacy and how a corresponding imaginary bonded this legacy, BAO, and extraterrestrial intelligence. As part of the growing prospect of reaching out to other civilizations through radio waves in the 1960s, radio astronomers from Russian research institutes initiated the theoretical and empirical study of extraterrestrial civilizations and engaged with their Armenian counterparts. In so doing, they set a framework for contact through electromagnetic waves with extraterrestrial civilizations. Thereby, the epistemological constraints and affordances of astronomical distance gave rise to an (extra)terrestrial narrative of development. Armenian natural scientists responded positively to the study of extraterrestrial civilizations, though their engagement with this field remained passive. The scientific imaginary of extraterrestrial civilizations, however, contained pillars for the study of Armenian ancient astronomical past. As a result, when Soviet radio astronomy legitimized the study of extraterrestrial civilizations, it also legitimized the study of distant civilizations situated in the perceived historical past of the Armenian astronomical intelligentsia. In the rediscovery of ancient Armenia as an astronomical civilization by BAO (archeo)astronomers, national identity and historical continuity were at stake. Today, this imaginary continues.","PeriodicalId":51152,"journal":{"name":"Social Studies of Science","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Studies of Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251324659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article draws on post-positivist conceptualizations of distance in human geography to look at how Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO) astronomers identified with an ancient scientific-cultural legacy and how a corresponding imaginary bonded this legacy, BAO, and extraterrestrial intelligence. As part of the growing prospect of reaching out to other civilizations through radio waves in the 1960s, radio astronomers from Russian research institutes initiated the theoretical and empirical study of extraterrestrial civilizations and engaged with their Armenian counterparts. In so doing, they set a framework for contact through electromagnetic waves with extraterrestrial civilizations. Thereby, the epistemological constraints and affordances of astronomical distance gave rise to an (extra)terrestrial narrative of development. Armenian natural scientists responded positively to the study of extraterrestrial civilizations, though their engagement with this field remained passive. The scientific imaginary of extraterrestrial civilizations, however, contained pillars for the study of Armenian ancient astronomical past. As a result, when Soviet radio astronomy legitimized the study of extraterrestrial civilizations, it also legitimized the study of distant civilizations situated in the perceived historical past of the Armenian astronomical intelligentsia. In the rediscovery of ancient Armenia as an astronomical civilization by BAO (archeo)astronomers, national identity and historical continuity were at stake. Today, this imaginary continues.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Studies of Science
Social Studies of Science 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Studies of Science is an international peer reviewed journal that encourages submissions of original research on science, technology and medicine. The journal is multidisciplinary, publishing work from a range of fields including: political science, sociology, economics, history, philosophy, psychology social anthropology, legal and educational disciplines. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信