Construction strategy of green alliance for energy mining supply chain from the perspective of policy combination

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yanbing Zhang, Changzheng Zhang, Zhengqi He, Chengyu Li
{"title":"Construction strategy of green alliance for energy mining supply chain from the perspective of policy combination","authors":"Yanbing Zhang, Changzheng Zhang, Zhengqi He, Chengyu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To promote green development, China has successively issued policy documents such as the \"National Carbon Emission Trading Management Measures\" and the \"Green mining construction Standards\". The government is driving the green transformation of energy and mining through market-oriented mechanisms and standardized construction. This paper adopts a simulation analysis method to systematically examine the strategic choices of mining enterprises and refining enterprises in terms of green technological innovation, in order to reveal the role of carbon trading policy and green mining construction policy in promoting the construction of green alliances in the energy mining supply chain. The optimal choices and emission reduction decisions of enterprises are analyzed from four dimensions: green mining construction, carbon emission reduction, carbon trading market position, and financial benefits. The results indicate that the policy impact of green mining construction presents a \"marginal diminishing effect\", and simply increasing the subsidy amount is not the optimal strategy; There is a strategic game between upstream and downstream enterprises in the supply chain, and the green technology innovation decisions of a single enterprise will affect the overall green transformation process; There are significant differences in the impact of different subsidy ranges on corporate behavior; The decision-making of refining enterprises relies less on environmental subsidies and tends to be based on market mechanisms. The reliability of the research conclusion was verified by combining sensitivity analysis and robustness analysis. This article analyzes for the first time the synergistic effects of carbon trading policies and green mining construction policies from the perspective of policy combinations, filling the research gap in the field of green transformation of mining supply chains through policy combinations.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145315","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To promote green development, China has successively issued policy documents such as the "National Carbon Emission Trading Management Measures" and the "Green mining construction Standards". The government is driving the green transformation of energy and mining through market-oriented mechanisms and standardized construction. This paper adopts a simulation analysis method to systematically examine the strategic choices of mining enterprises and refining enterprises in terms of green technological innovation, in order to reveal the role of carbon trading policy and green mining construction policy in promoting the construction of green alliances in the energy mining supply chain. The optimal choices and emission reduction decisions of enterprises are analyzed from four dimensions: green mining construction, carbon emission reduction, carbon trading market position, and financial benefits. The results indicate that the policy impact of green mining construction presents a "marginal diminishing effect", and simply increasing the subsidy amount is not the optimal strategy; There is a strategic game between upstream and downstream enterprises in the supply chain, and the green technology innovation decisions of a single enterprise will affect the overall green transformation process; There are significant differences in the impact of different subsidy ranges on corporate behavior; The decision-making of refining enterprises relies less on environmental subsidies and tends to be based on market mechanisms. The reliability of the research conclusion was verified by combining sensitivity analysis and robustness analysis. This article analyzes for the first time the synergistic effects of carbon trading policies and green mining construction policies from the perspective of policy combinations, filling the research gap in the field of green transformation of mining supply chains through policy combinations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信