Md Nuruzzaman Khan, Gemma Tarpey-Brown, Karen Block
{"title":"Reproductive Coercion and Abuse Among Forcibly Displaced Populations Worldwide: Evidence from a Systematic Review","authors":"Md Nuruzzaman Khan, Gemma Tarpey-Brown, Karen Block","doi":"10.1177/15248380251325187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a significant public health issue, with high prevalence expected in forcibly displaced populations. Despite its severe health impacts, studies on the extent, determinants, and impacts of RCA in forcibly displaced populations are notably lacking. This systematic review examines forcibly displaced women’s experiences of RCA, its perpetrators, associated factors, and health consequences. We conducted a systematic search across nine databases—Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, Global Health, Scopus, Emcare, and SocIndex—on July 30, 2024, using targeted search terms related to RCA and forcibly displaced populations. We included studies of any design (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) published at any time and in English, regardless of study settings. We used a socio-ecological framework to guide our narrative analysis of the findings. A total of 15 studies were included in the review, demonstrating various forms of RCA. These included coerced and unwanted sex, intentional contraception misuse, forced pregnancy, forced abortion, imposition of contraception without consent, control over reproductive decisions, forced marriage, and physical abuse for failing to give birth to male offspring. RCA was found to be supported and exacerbated by a range of challenges situated across multiple socio-ecological levels: individual (economic dependency, accommodation), relationship (partner), community (community members, religious and cultural norms), institutional (armed forces, international forced migration), and societal and global levels (country-level policies, state actors, international forced migration). The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions that address the underlying socio-economic, legal, and cultural factors contributing to RCA in these settings.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251325187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a significant public health issue, with high prevalence expected in forcibly displaced populations. Despite its severe health impacts, studies on the extent, determinants, and impacts of RCA in forcibly displaced populations are notably lacking. This systematic review examines forcibly displaced women’s experiences of RCA, its perpetrators, associated factors, and health consequences. We conducted a systematic search across nine databases—Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, Global Health, Scopus, Emcare, and SocIndex—on July 30, 2024, using targeted search terms related to RCA and forcibly displaced populations. We included studies of any design (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) published at any time and in English, regardless of study settings. We used a socio-ecological framework to guide our narrative analysis of the findings. A total of 15 studies were included in the review, demonstrating various forms of RCA. These included coerced and unwanted sex, intentional contraception misuse, forced pregnancy, forced abortion, imposition of contraception without consent, control over reproductive decisions, forced marriage, and physical abuse for failing to give birth to male offspring. RCA was found to be supported and exacerbated by a range of challenges situated across multiple socio-ecological levels: individual (economic dependency, accommodation), relationship (partner), community (community members, religious and cultural norms), institutional (armed forces, international forced migration), and societal and global levels (country-level policies, state actors, international forced migration). The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions that address the underlying socio-economic, legal, and cultural factors contributing to RCA in these settings.
生殖强迫和虐待(RCA)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,预计在被迫流离失所人口中发病率很高。尽管对健康有严重影响,但对被迫流离失所人口中的RCA的程度、决定因素和影响的研究明显缺乏。本系统综述审查了被迫流离失所妇女在RCA中的经历、肇事者、相关因素和健康后果。我们于2024年7月30日对medline、CINAHL、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Embase、Global Health、Scopus、Emcare和socindex等9个数据库进行了系统搜索,使用与RCA和被迫流离失所人口相关的目标搜索词。我们纳入了在任何时间以英语发表的任何设计(定性、定量和混合方法)的研究,无论研究环境如何。我们使用社会生态框架来指导我们对研究结果的叙事分析。本综述共纳入了15项研究,展示了各种形式的RCA。其中包括强迫和非自愿的性行为、故意滥用避孕措施、强迫怀孕、强迫堕胎、未经同意强制避孕、控制生育决定、强迫婚姻以及因未能生育男性后代而遭受身体虐待。研究发现,RCA受到多个社会生态层面的一系列挑战的支持和加剧,这些挑战包括:个人(经济依赖、住宿)、关系(伙伴)、社区(社区成员、宗教和文化规范)、机构(武装部队、国际强迫移民)以及社会和全球层面(国家级政策、国家行为体、国际强迫移民)。研究结果强调了有针对性的干预措施的必要性,以解决在这些环境中导致RCA的潜在社会经济、法律和文化因素。
期刊介绍:
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.