Cortical and behavioral tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Anne Keitel, Claire Pelofi, Xinyi Guan, Emily Watson, Lucy Wight, Sarah Allen, Iris Mencke, Christian Keitel, Johanna Rimmele
{"title":"Cortical and behavioral tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise","authors":"Anne Keitel,&nbsp;Claire Pelofi,&nbsp;Xinyi Guan,&nbsp;Emily Watson,&nbsp;Lucy Wight,&nbsp;Sarah Allen,&nbsp;Iris Mencke,&nbsp;Christian Keitel,&nbsp;Johanna Rimmele","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cortical tracking of stimulus features is a crucial neural requisite of how we process continuous music. We here tested whether cortical tracking of the beat, typically related to rhythm processing, is modulated by pitch predictability and other top-down factors. Participants listened to tonal (high pitch predictability) and atonal (low pitch predictability) music while undergoing electroencephalography. We analyzed their cortical tracking of the acoustic envelope. Cortical envelope tracking was stronger while listening to atonal music, potentially reflecting listeners’ violated pitch expectations and increased attention allocation. Envelope tracking was also stronger with more expertise and enjoyment. Furthermore, we showed cortical tracking of pitch surprisal (using IDyOM), which suggests that listeners’ expectations match those computed by the IDyOM model, with higher surprisal for atonal music. Behaviorally, we measured participants’ ability to finger-tap to the beat of tonal and atonal sequences in two experiments. Finger-tapping performance was better in the tonal condition, indicating a positive effect of pitch predictability on behavioral rhythm processing. Cortical envelope tracking predicted tapping performance for tonal music, as did pitch-surprisal tracking for atonal music, indicating that high and low predictability might impose different processing regimes. Taken together, our results show various ways that top-down factors impact musical rhythm processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1546 1","pages":"120-135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nyas.15315","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cortical tracking of stimulus features is a crucial neural requisite of how we process continuous music. We here tested whether cortical tracking of the beat, typically related to rhythm processing, is modulated by pitch predictability and other top-down factors. Participants listened to tonal (high pitch predictability) and atonal (low pitch predictability) music while undergoing electroencephalography. We analyzed their cortical tracking of the acoustic envelope. Cortical envelope tracking was stronger while listening to atonal music, potentially reflecting listeners’ violated pitch expectations and increased attention allocation. Envelope tracking was also stronger with more expertise and enjoyment. Furthermore, we showed cortical tracking of pitch surprisal (using IDyOM), which suggests that listeners’ expectations match those computed by the IDyOM model, with higher surprisal for atonal music. Behaviorally, we measured participants’ ability to finger-tap to the beat of tonal and atonal sequences in two experiments. Finger-tapping performance was better in the tonal condition, indicating a positive effect of pitch predictability on behavioral rhythm processing. Cortical envelope tracking predicted tapping performance for tonal music, as did pitch-surprisal tracking for atonal music, indicating that high and low predictability might impose different processing regimes. Taken together, our results show various ways that top-down factors impact musical rhythm processing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

音乐节奏的皮层和行为追踪:音调可预见性、享受和专业知识的影响
皮层对刺激特征的跟踪是我们处理连续音乐的关键神经条件。我们在这里测试了大脑皮层对节拍的跟踪(通常与节奏处理有关)是否受到音调可预测性和其他自上而下的因素的调节。参与者一边听有调性(高音调可预测)和无调性(低音调可预测)音乐,一边接受脑电图检查。我们分析了他们的皮层对声学包络的追踪。在听无调性音乐时,皮质包膜跟踪更强,这可能反映了听者违背了音高预期,增加了注意力分配。随着专业知识和乐趣的增加,信封追踪也变得更加强大。此外,我们展示了对音调惊喜的皮质跟踪(使用IDyOM),这表明听众的期望与IDyOM模型计算的结果相匹配,无调性音乐的惊喜程度更高。在行为上,我们在两个实验中测量了参与者手指敲击音调和无音调序列的能力。在音调条件下,手指敲击表现更好,这表明音调可预测性对行为节奏加工有积极影响。皮质包络跟踪预测了调性音乐的敲击表现,音调-惊喜跟踪也预测了无调性音乐的敲击表现,这表明高可预测性和低可预测性可能会施加不同的处理机制。综上所述,我们的研究结果显示了自上而下的因素影响音乐节奏处理的各种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信