Costs and cost-effectiveness of integrated screening for non-communicable diseases in TB contacts.

IJTLD open Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0625
Y Hamada, R Mukora, R Pelusa, T Ntshiqa, J Shedrawy, K Velen, I Abubakar, S Charalambous, S Walker, M X Rangaka
{"title":"Costs and cost-effectiveness of integrated screening for non-communicable diseases in TB contacts.","authors":"Y Hamada, R Mukora, R Pelusa, T Ntshiqa, J Shedrawy, K Velen, I Abubakar, S Charalambous, S Walker, M X Rangaka","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrating non-communicable disease (NCD) screening into TB household contact investigations may identify undiagnosed NCDs and reduce the burden of both conditions. However, evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness of this approach is limited.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study in South Africa to assess patient and provider costs for NCD screening (hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidaemia). Incremental costs per NCD case identified were calculated. Using a decision tree model, we estimated incremental costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted over 10 years from a healthcare perspective, with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimated using the WHO prediction model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incremental cost was USD72.3 per contact screened and USD334.0 per NCD case identified. Integrated screening reduced mean 10-year CVD risk from 5.7% to 2.7% among contacts with NCDs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was USD27,043.6 per DALY averted, exceeding South Africa's threshold of USD3,708. Management of identified NCDs, mainly drug costs, comprised over 80% of total incremental costs. The ICER decreased in populations with a high risk for NCDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrated NCD screening was not cost-effective, mainly due to subsequent care costs. Prioritising individuals at high risk for NCDs can improve cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":519984,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD open","volume":"2 3","pages":"160-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrating non-communicable disease (NCD) screening into TB household contact investigations may identify undiagnosed NCDs and reduce the burden of both conditions. However, evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness of this approach is limited.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study in South Africa to assess patient and provider costs for NCD screening (hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidaemia). Incremental costs per NCD case identified were calculated. Using a decision tree model, we estimated incremental costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted over 10 years from a healthcare perspective, with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimated using the WHO prediction model.

Results: The incremental cost was USD72.3 per contact screened and USD334.0 per NCD case identified. Integrated screening reduced mean 10-year CVD risk from 5.7% to 2.7% among contacts with NCDs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was USD27,043.6 per DALY averted, exceeding South Africa's threshold of USD3,708. Management of identified NCDs, mainly drug costs, comprised over 80% of total incremental costs. The ICER decreased in populations with a high risk for NCDs.

Conclusion: Integrated NCD screening was not cost-effective, mainly due to subsequent care costs. Prioritising individuals at high risk for NCDs can improve cost-effectiveness.

结核病接触者非传染性疾病综合筛查的成本和成本效益。
背景:将非传染性疾病(NCD)筛查纳入结核病家庭接触调查可能会发现未确诊的非传染性疾病,并减轻这两种疾病的负担。然而,关于这种方法的成本和成本效益的证据有限。方法:我们在南非进行了一项横断面研究,以评估非传染性疾病筛查(高血压、糖尿病、慢性肾病、血脂异常)的患者和提供者成本。计算每个确定的非传染性疾病病例的增量成本。使用决策树模型,我们从医疗保健的角度估计了10年内每个残疾调整生命年(DALY)避免的增量成本,并使用世卫组织预测模型估计了心血管疾病(CVD)风险。结果:每个筛查接触者的增量成本为72.3美元,每个鉴定非传染性疾病病例的增量成本为334.0美元。综合筛查将非传染性疾病接触者的平均10年心血管疾病风险从5.7%降低到2.7%。每减少一个DALY,增量成本效益比(ICER)为27,043.6美元,超过了南非3,708美元的门槛。已确定的非传染性疾病的管理,主要是药品费用,占总增量费用的80%以上。非传染性疾病高危人群的ICER降低。结论:综合非传染性疾病筛查不具有成本效益,主要是由于后续护理费用。优先考虑非传染性疾病高风险人群可以提高成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信