Utilization of medicinal hemp: a qualitative analysis of clinicians' perspectives in Ghana.

IF 4.1 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Radolf Ansbert Nortey, Anoa Aidoo, Seth Kwabena Amponsah
{"title":"Utilization of medicinal hemp: a qualitative analysis of clinicians' perspectives in Ghana.","authors":"Radolf Ansbert Nortey, Anoa Aidoo, Seth Kwabena Amponsah","doi":"10.1186/s42238-025-00271-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have explored the perspectives of health care professionals on the use of medicinal hemp, but they were mostly situated in high income countries. This study sets out to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of health care professionals regarding the use of hemp in clinical therapy vis-à-vis the legislative framework in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the perspectives of physicians on the use of medicinal hemp and its legalization in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study employing purposive sampling and face-to-face in-depth interviews was conducted among twenty (20) physicians practicing in Ghana. The interviewees were selected based on specialty and scope of practice. The in-depth interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using the Theory of Planned Behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty (20) clinicians participated in the study. Fourteen (14) respondents were male and six (6) were female. The medical specialties of the interviewees were anaesthesiology, oncology, neurology, and orthopaedics. The identified themes include clinical use, stigma (sociocultural classification of cannabis), clinical non-prescription, policy landscape and regulatory control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prescribers' intention to recommend medicinal hemp is influenced by a complex interplay of various socio-political factors such as knowledge, policy, cultural environment, and stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":"7 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00271-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have explored the perspectives of health care professionals on the use of medicinal hemp, but they were mostly situated in high income countries. This study sets out to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of health care professionals regarding the use of hemp in clinical therapy vis-à-vis the legislative framework in Ghana.

Objective: To explore the perspectives of physicians on the use of medicinal hemp and its legalization in Ghana.

Method: A qualitative study employing purposive sampling and face-to-face in-depth interviews was conducted among twenty (20) physicians practicing in Ghana. The interviewees were selected based on specialty and scope of practice. The in-depth interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using the Theory of Planned Behavior.

Results: Twenty (20) clinicians participated in the study. Fourteen (14) respondents were male and six (6) were female. The medical specialties of the interviewees were anaesthesiology, oncology, neurology, and orthopaedics. The identified themes include clinical use, stigma (sociocultural classification of cannabis), clinical non-prescription, policy landscape and regulatory control.

Conclusion: Prescribers' intention to recommend medicinal hemp is influenced by a complex interplay of various socio-political factors such as knowledge, policy, cultural environment, and stigma.

背景:以往的研究探讨了医疗保健专业人员对使用药用大麻的看法,但这些研究主要集中在高收入国家。本研究旨在根据加纳的立法框架,调查医护专业人员在临床治疗中使用大麻的知识、态度和信念:探讨加纳医生对药用大麻的使用及其合法化的看法:采用目的性抽样和面对面深入访谈的方法,对加纳的二十(20)名执业医师进行了定性研究。受访者是根据专业和执业范围选出的。对深入访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用计划行为理论进行了主题分析:20 名临床医生参与了研究。14 名受访者为男性,6 名为女性。受访者的医学专业为麻醉学、肿瘤学、神经学和骨科。确定的主题包括临床使用、污名化(大麻的社会文化分类)、临床非处方、政策环境和监管控制:处方者推荐药用大麻的意愿受到各种社会政治因素(如知识、政策、文化环境和污名化)的复杂相互作用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信