The Efficacy of Low-Temperature Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma (LTAPP) in the Multicenter Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Warangkana Tonaree, Sitthichoke Taweepraditpol, Natthapong Kongkunnavat, Nattanit Poungjantaradej, Boonyaporn Kotistienkul, Min Yongsuvimol, Kusuma Chinaroonchai, Pitawan Rachata, Pattana Ongkasuwan, Orawan Chansanti, Atthawit Mongkornwong, Chonlathorn Chaichote, Apirag Chuangsuwanich
{"title":"The Efficacy of Low-Temperature Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma (LTAPP) in the Multicenter Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Warangkana Tonaree, Sitthichoke Taweepraditpol, Natthapong Kongkunnavat, Nattanit Poungjantaradej, Boonyaporn Kotistienkul, Min Yongsuvimol, Kusuma Chinaroonchai, Pitawan Rachata, Pattana Ongkasuwan, Orawan Chansanti, Atthawit Mongkornwong, Chonlathorn Chaichote, Apirag Chuangsuwanich","doi":"10.1177/15347346251323940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThis study is to examine the reduction in wound size between the LTAPP and the control group and also investigate the wound healing effect factor.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted at five study centers. Participated patients were between 18-80 years old who had pressure ulcer wound(s) and excluded patients with high risk or receiving other treatment such as previous radiation therapy in the affected area, pregnancy, sepsis, and immunocompromised host. The study divided participant into LTAPP group and standard of care (SOC) group, the LTAPP group would received a dressing of non-Ag materials and administer LTAPP for 1 min per 1 cm<sup>2</sup> (maximum of 20 min). The SOC group would received standard dressing wound protocol. Both groups would be followed until the end of study (ninth visit) or until the wound healed.ResultsWhen considering patients who attended follow-up ≥4 visits, only 45 ulcers were eligible, of which consisted of 21 ulcers in the LTAPP group and 24 ulcers in the SOC group. The results showed significant healing rate of the LTAPP group, whether to be the wound size: wound area and wound volume, wound healing: exudate reduction, granulation and lesser necrotic tissue or Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score. The LTAPP group had better bacterial load reduction without the use of tropical antibiotic, this also signified the quality in bacterial eradication of LTAPP.ConclusionLTAPP showed outstanding performance in treating pressure ulcer wounds. The LTAPP gave greater outcome in wound size, wound healing indicators, microbiological analyses and cost-effective comparison. Although, the absence of statistical significance, it did not affect the outcome trends. This study suggested further investigation of the potential role of LTAPP therapy in different wound types in near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251323940"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251323940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThis study is to examine the reduction in wound size between the LTAPP and the control group and also investigate the wound healing effect factor.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted at five study centers. Participated patients were between 18-80 years old who had pressure ulcer wound(s) and excluded patients with high risk or receiving other treatment such as previous radiation therapy in the affected area, pregnancy, sepsis, and immunocompromised host. The study divided participant into LTAPP group and standard of care (SOC) group, the LTAPP group would received a dressing of non-Ag materials and administer LTAPP for 1 min per 1 cm2 (maximum of 20 min). The SOC group would received standard dressing wound protocol. Both groups would be followed until the end of study (ninth visit) or until the wound healed.ResultsWhen considering patients who attended follow-up ≥4 visits, only 45 ulcers were eligible, of which consisted of 21 ulcers in the LTAPP group and 24 ulcers in the SOC group. The results showed significant healing rate of the LTAPP group, whether to be the wound size: wound area and wound volume, wound healing: exudate reduction, granulation and lesser necrotic tissue or Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score. The LTAPP group had better bacterial load reduction without the use of tropical antibiotic, this also signified the quality in bacterial eradication of LTAPP.ConclusionLTAPP showed outstanding performance in treating pressure ulcer wounds. The LTAPP gave greater outcome in wound size, wound healing indicators, microbiological analyses and cost-effective comparison. Although, the absence of statistical significance, it did not affect the outcome trends. This study suggested further investigation of the potential role of LTAPP therapy in different wound types in near future.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信