Cost Burden of Cancer Screening in Kansas by Region and Rural/Urban Designation.

Kansas journal of medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol18.22836
Kale Mills, Nicole Freund
{"title":"Cost Burden of Cancer Screening in Kansas by Region and Rural/Urban Designation.","authors":"Kale Mills, Nicole Freund","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol18.22836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2022, the U.S. healthcare expenditure totaled $4.5 trillion, representing 17.3% of its gross domestic product. Despite this, 26 million Americans remain uninsured, often relying on out-of-pocket payments for essential services like cancer screenings. Kansas, with its high uninsured rate, faces unique challenges, emphasizing the need to analyze the cost burden of these critical yet repeatable interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors of this cross-sectional study analyzed hospital pricing transparency data for breast, lung, and colon cancer screening costs across 124 Kansas hospitals. Data on self-pay costs were collected and compared between urban and rural regions, as well as geographic price variations. Statistical analyses included measures of central tendency, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests to evaluate differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pricing disparities were evident across Kansas. Urban hospitals charged higher prices for chest computed tomography (CT) scans, while rural hospitals had elevated costs for colonoscopies and mammograms. Notable price variation included Northeast Kansas colonoscopy prices, which ranged from $595 to $11,684. Rural residents faced a greater financial burden, spending 7% of their income on screenings compared to 6% for urban residents. Median screening prices statewide were $2,247 for colonoscopies, $1,109 for chest CT scans, and $228 for mammograms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These disparities call for targeted policy interventions, such as Medicaid expansion, standardized pricing regulations, and increased support for low-cost clinics. Enhanced hospital pricing transparency is critical for empowering patients and reducing financial burdens. This study highlights the urgent need for equitable access to cancer screenings in Kansas.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"10-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol18.22836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 2022, the U.S. healthcare expenditure totaled $4.5 trillion, representing 17.3% of its gross domestic product. Despite this, 26 million Americans remain uninsured, often relying on out-of-pocket payments for essential services like cancer screenings. Kansas, with its high uninsured rate, faces unique challenges, emphasizing the need to analyze the cost burden of these critical yet repeatable interventions.

Methods: Authors of this cross-sectional study analyzed hospital pricing transparency data for breast, lung, and colon cancer screening costs across 124 Kansas hospitals. Data on self-pay costs were collected and compared between urban and rural regions, as well as geographic price variations. Statistical analyses included measures of central tendency, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests to evaluate differences.

Results: Pricing disparities were evident across Kansas. Urban hospitals charged higher prices for chest computed tomography (CT) scans, while rural hospitals had elevated costs for colonoscopies and mammograms. Notable price variation included Northeast Kansas colonoscopy prices, which ranged from $595 to $11,684. Rural residents faced a greater financial burden, spending 7% of their income on screenings compared to 6% for urban residents. Median screening prices statewide were $2,247 for colonoscopies, $1,109 for chest CT scans, and $228 for mammograms.

Conclusions: These disparities call for targeted policy interventions, such as Medicaid expansion, standardized pricing regulations, and increased support for low-cost clinics. Enhanced hospital pricing transparency is critical for empowering patients and reducing financial burdens. This study highlights the urgent need for equitable access to cancer screenings in Kansas.

按地区和农村/城市指定的堪萨斯州癌症筛查的费用负担。
导读:2022年,美国医疗保健支出总额为4.5万亿美元,占其国内生产总值的17.3%。尽管如此,仍有2600万美国人没有保险,他们通常依靠自掏腰包来享受癌症筛查等基本服务。堪萨斯州的未参保率很高,面临着独特的挑战,强调有必要分析这些关键但可重复的干预措施的成本负担。方法:本横断面研究的作者分析了堪萨斯州124家医院的乳腺癌、肺癌和结肠癌筛查费用的医院定价透明度数据。收集和比较了城市和农村地区之间的自费费用数据以及地理价格差异。统计分析包括集中趋势测量、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验来评估差异。结果:价格差异在堪萨斯州是明显的。城市医院对胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)收费较高,而农村医院对结肠镜检查和乳房x光检查收费较高。值得注意的价格变化包括堪萨斯州东北部结肠镜检查的价格,从595美元到11,684美元不等。农村居民面临更大的经济负担,他们将收入的7%用于筛查,而城市居民的这一比例为6%。在全州范围内,结肠镜检查的平均价格为2247美元,胸部CT扫描为1109美元,乳房x光检查为228美元。结论:这些差异需要有针对性的政策干预,如扩大医疗补助、标准化定价法规和增加对低成本诊所的支持。提高医院定价透明度对于增强患者权能和减轻财政负担至关重要。这项研究强调了在堪萨斯州公平获得癌症筛查的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信