Perception and Attitude of First-Time Mothers Towards Caesarean Section in Secondary Health Care Facility (A Mixed-Method Study).

Olajumoke Ayisat Olalude, Olatunji O Lawal, Imran O Morhason-Bello
{"title":"Perception and Attitude of First-Time Mothers Towards Caesarean Section in Secondary Health Care Facility (A Mixed-Method Study).","authors":"Olajumoke Ayisat Olalude, Olatunji O Lawal, Imran O Morhason-Bello","doi":"10.4103/jwas.jwas_38_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the global rise in caesarean section (CS), Nigeria has a CS rate of 2.8%, which is far below the World Health Organisation recommendation of 10%-15%. Primigravida and/or first-time mothers constitute a cohort of women who are prone to obstetric emergencies such as cephalo-pelvic disproportion and obstructed labour.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the first-time mothers' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards CS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods study conducted among first-time mothers (primigravids >28weeks and first-time CS-delivered) at Adeoyo Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ibadan, using questionnaires that assessed knowledge and attitude for the quantitative aspect and in-depth interviews for the qualitative aspect using a structured topic guide. Responses from the quantitative aspect were analysed using STATA 15, and each participant's level of knowledge was scored and categorised as: Good knowledge >70%, fair knowledge 50%-70% and poor knowledge <50%. Content analysis was done for the qualitative aspect, and emerging themes on perception and interpretation in CS were summarised and presented as results for interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 275 mothers (178 pregnant and 97 CS-delivered) were sampled. Only a few (13.45%) of the participants had good knowledge with an equivocal attitude towards CS. The majority (84%) believed that CS helped in saving lives. Also, there was a statistically significant difference between their knowledge and their educational level, occupation, religion, ethnicity, and family income (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The multinomial regression showed that gainfully employed Christian women significantly had more fair and good knowledge than Muslims (RR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.13-3.57, <i>P</i> = 0.017) (RR = 2.71, 95% CI = 1.23-5.95, <i>P</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a small number of the participants had good knowledge, and their perceptions about CS varied. The attitudes of participants towards CS appeared mixed, as nearly equal proportions of participants had positive and negative attitudes. Hence, there is a need to increase advocacy, antenatal education, and counselling during antenatal clinic visits. Also, first-time mothers need to be put on insurance to reduce the burden of costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","volume":"15 2","pages":"224-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_38_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the global rise in caesarean section (CS), Nigeria has a CS rate of 2.8%, which is far below the World Health Organisation recommendation of 10%-15%. Primigravida and/or first-time mothers constitute a cohort of women who are prone to obstetric emergencies such as cephalo-pelvic disproportion and obstructed labour.

Objectives: To evaluate the first-time mothers' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards CS.

Materials and methods: This was a mixed-methods study conducted among first-time mothers (primigravids >28weeks and first-time CS-delivered) at Adeoyo Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ibadan, using questionnaires that assessed knowledge and attitude for the quantitative aspect and in-depth interviews for the qualitative aspect using a structured topic guide. Responses from the quantitative aspect were analysed using STATA 15, and each participant's level of knowledge was scored and categorised as: Good knowledge >70%, fair knowledge 50%-70% and poor knowledge <50%. Content analysis was done for the qualitative aspect, and emerging themes on perception and interpretation in CS were summarised and presented as results for interpretation.

Results: About 275 mothers (178 pregnant and 97 CS-delivered) were sampled. Only a few (13.45%) of the participants had good knowledge with an equivocal attitude towards CS. The majority (84%) believed that CS helped in saving lives. Also, there was a statistically significant difference between their knowledge and their educational level, occupation, religion, ethnicity, and family income (P < 0.05). The multinomial regression showed that gainfully employed Christian women significantly had more fair and good knowledge than Muslims (RR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.13-3.57, P = 0.017) (RR = 2.71, 95% CI = 1.23-5.95, P = 0.013).

Conclusion: Only a small number of the participants had good knowledge, and their perceptions about CS varied. The attitudes of participants towards CS appeared mixed, as nearly equal proportions of participants had positive and negative attitudes. Hence, there is a need to increase advocacy, antenatal education, and counselling during antenatal clinic visits. Also, first-time mothers need to be put on insurance to reduce the burden of costs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信