From Monotherapy to Combination Strategies: Redefining Treatment Approaches for Multiple-Cause Macular Edema.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S513141
Qianwei Zhu, Xuchong Pan, Zhenni Du, Jianing Ying, Yiran Hu, Quanyong Yi, Xiangxiang Fu
{"title":"From Monotherapy to Combination Strategies: Redefining Treatment Approaches for Multiple-Cause Macular Edema.","authors":"Qianwei Zhu, Xuchong Pan, Zhenni Du, Jianing Ying, Yiran Hu, Quanyong Yi, Xiangxiang Fu","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S513141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Macular edema (ME) is a leading cause of visual impairment in various retinal disorders. Current treatment modalities, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and corticosteroids, often require repeated applications, increasing both medical and economic burdens. ME is driven by chronic inflammation and VEGF overexpression, causing fluid accumulation in the macula. Recent studies have highlighted the role of various cytokines in ME pathogenesis, necessitating a comprehensive approach to treatment. While monotherapies have shown efficacy, they are associated with limitations such as the need for frequent injections and potential side effects. Combination therapies, including anti-VEGF drugs with macular laser photocoagulation, triamcinolone acetonide, or dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex), have emerged as promising strategies. This review analyzes the outcomes of various combination approaches in different types of ME, including diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion-associated ME (RVO-ME), and uveitic macular edema (UME). The potential benefits of combining anti-VEGF and anti-inflammatory treatments are discussed, along with the need for personalized treatment regimens. Future research directions are outlined, emphasizing the importance of large-scale, long-term studies to evaluate the sustained efficacy and safety of combination therapies. The integration of advanced imaging techniques, biomarker analysis, and innovative therapeutic approaches is expected to shape the future landscape of ME management, moving towards more targeted and effective combination therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"887-897"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S513141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Macular edema (ME) is a leading cause of visual impairment in various retinal disorders. Current treatment modalities, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and corticosteroids, often require repeated applications, increasing both medical and economic burdens. ME is driven by chronic inflammation and VEGF overexpression, causing fluid accumulation in the macula. Recent studies have highlighted the role of various cytokines in ME pathogenesis, necessitating a comprehensive approach to treatment. While monotherapies have shown efficacy, they are associated with limitations such as the need for frequent injections and potential side effects. Combination therapies, including anti-VEGF drugs with macular laser photocoagulation, triamcinolone acetonide, or dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex), have emerged as promising strategies. This review analyzes the outcomes of various combination approaches in different types of ME, including diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion-associated ME (RVO-ME), and uveitic macular edema (UME). The potential benefits of combining anti-VEGF and anti-inflammatory treatments are discussed, along with the need for personalized treatment regimens. Future research directions are outlined, emphasizing the importance of large-scale, long-term studies to evaluate the sustained efficacy and safety of combination therapies. The integration of advanced imaging techniques, biomarker analysis, and innovative therapeutic approaches is expected to shape the future landscape of ME management, moving towards more targeted and effective combination therapies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信