Comparing the Effectiveness of GLUMA and 940 nm Laser for Improving Crown Retention with Self-Adhesive Cement.

Pantea Amiri, Ghazale Tekie, Arash Azizi, Shirin Lawaf
{"title":"Comparing the Effectiveness of GLUMA and 940 nm Laser for Improving Crown Retention with Self-Adhesive Cement.","authors":"Pantea Amiri, Ghazale Tekie, Arash Azizi, Shirin Lawaf","doi":"10.30476/dentjods.2024.99630.2165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of the problem: </strong>The retention of dental crowns plays a pivotal role in their long-term success and maintenance. According to the ongoing controversy about the effect of GLUMA desensitizer and diode laser on the retention of full metal crowns, this study seeks to investigate the effectiveness of two different methods in enhancing the bond strength of full-metal crowns.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was developed to compare the effect of 940nm diode laser and GLUMA desensitizer on the bond strength of full-metal crowns cemented by self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200).</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong></p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Crown retention in the 940 nm diode laser group (166.86±34.25 N) was significantly lower than the GLUMA desensitizer group (318.59±56.31 N) (<i>p</i>< 0.05), but there was no significant difference with the control group (138.17±40.81). Crown retention in the GLUMA desensitizer group was significantly higher than the other groups (<i>p</i>< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results of this study showed that GLUMA desensitizer had a positive effect, and 940nm diode laser had no effect on the retention of crowns cemented by self-adhesive resin cement.</p>","PeriodicalId":73702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","volume":"26 1","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2024.99630.2165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of the problem: The retention of dental crowns plays a pivotal role in their long-term success and maintenance. According to the ongoing controversy about the effect of GLUMA desensitizer and diode laser on the retention of full metal crowns, this study seeks to investigate the effectiveness of two different methods in enhancing the bond strength of full-metal crowns.

Purpose: This study was developed to compare the effect of 940nm diode laser and GLUMA desensitizer on the bond strength of full-metal crowns cemented by self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200).

Materials and method:

Results: Crown retention in the 940 nm diode laser group (166.86±34.25 N) was significantly lower than the GLUMA desensitizer group (318.59±56.31 N) (p< 0.05), but there was no significant difference with the control group (138.17±40.81). Crown retention in the GLUMA desensitizer group was significantly higher than the other groups (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: Results of this study showed that GLUMA desensitizer had a positive effect, and 940nm diode laser had no effect on the retention of crowns cemented by self-adhesive resin cement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

GLUMA与940 nm激光改善自粘固位的效果比较。
问题陈述:牙冠的保留在牙冠的长期成功和维护中起着关键作用。针对目前关于GLUMA脱敏剂和二极管激光对全金属冠固位影响的争议,本研究旨在探讨两种不同方法提高全金属冠粘接强度的有效性。目的:比较940nm二极管激光与GLUMA脱敏剂对自粘树脂水泥(RelyX U200)全金属冠粘接强度的影响。结果:940 nm二极管激光组牙冠固位(166.86±34.25 N)显著低于GLUMA脱敏剂组(318.59±56.31 N) (p< 0.05),与对照组(138.17±40.81)差异无统计学意义。GLUMA脱敏剂组冠固位显著高于其他组(p< 0.05)。结论:本研究结果显示GLUMA脱敏剂具有积极作用,940nm二极管激光对自粘树脂胶结冠固位无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信