Impact of workforce characteristics and monetary incentives on uptake of health and wellbeing initiatives in the United Kingdom.

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003984
Adejoke Edet, Laura Kudrna, Laura Quinn
{"title":"Impact of workforce characteristics and monetary incentives on uptake of health and wellbeing initiatives in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Adejoke Edet, Laura Kudrna, Laura Quinn","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0003984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are economic and social benefits associated with promoting the health and wellbeing (HWB) of workers. The workplace is an important setting for HWB promotion, however, small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) are less likely to offer these programmes. Uptake is also uneven across demographic groups, contributing to inequalities outcomes. This study investigates if uptake of HWB promotion programmes in SMEs differs by employee demographics and if these factors interact with the effectiveness of organisational-level monetary incentives to improve uptake. In a secondary analysis of quantitative data from a cluster-randomised controlled trial, multilevel logistic regression models were fitted to examine the relationship between the outcome (uptake of HWB initiatives) and employee demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, education level). Models included interactions between the trial arm (monetary incentive or control) and employee demographics. Results showed that employees in the incentive arm had similar uptake of HWB initiatives compared to the control (adjusted OR 1.11, CI 0.72, 1.70, p = 0.64). In tests of the demographic factors, employees 55+ years had 56% lower odds of uptake (CI 0.25, 0.76, p = 0.003) compared to employees aged 17 to 24 years and these results were robust to treating age as a continuous variable. There were no statistically significant interactions between the incentive and the other employee demographic groups for the uptake of HWB initiatives. Organisational-level monetary incentives do not appear to differ in their effectiveness according to employee demographics, although some sub-groups appeared under-represented in the trial including ethnic minorities and those with education below degree-level. Older workers in SMEs may be less likely to engage in workplace HWB initiatives and could be targeted in terms of workplace HWB implementation, policy, and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 3","pages":"e0003984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are economic and social benefits associated with promoting the health and wellbeing (HWB) of workers. The workplace is an important setting for HWB promotion, however, small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) are less likely to offer these programmes. Uptake is also uneven across demographic groups, contributing to inequalities outcomes. This study investigates if uptake of HWB promotion programmes in SMEs differs by employee demographics and if these factors interact with the effectiveness of organisational-level monetary incentives to improve uptake. In a secondary analysis of quantitative data from a cluster-randomised controlled trial, multilevel logistic regression models were fitted to examine the relationship between the outcome (uptake of HWB initiatives) and employee demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, education level). Models included interactions between the trial arm (monetary incentive or control) and employee demographics. Results showed that employees in the incentive arm had similar uptake of HWB initiatives compared to the control (adjusted OR 1.11, CI 0.72, 1.70, p = 0.64). In tests of the demographic factors, employees 55+ years had 56% lower odds of uptake (CI 0.25, 0.76, p = 0.003) compared to employees aged 17 to 24 years and these results were robust to treating age as a continuous variable. There were no statistically significant interactions between the incentive and the other employee demographic groups for the uptake of HWB initiatives. Organisational-level monetary incentives do not appear to differ in their effectiveness according to employee demographics, although some sub-groups appeared under-represented in the trial including ethnic minorities and those with education below degree-level. Older workers in SMEs may be less likely to engage in workplace HWB initiatives and could be targeted in terms of workplace HWB implementation, policy, and research.

促进工人的健康和幸福(HWB)可带来经济和社会效益。工作场所是促进健康与福利的重要环境,然而,中小型企业(SMEs)提供这些计划的可能性较小。不同人口群体对这些计划的接受程度也不均衡,从而导致了结果的不平等。本研究调查了在中小型企业中,员工的人口统计学特征是否会影响健康与妇幼保健宣传计划的吸收率,以及这些因素是否会与组织层面的货币激励措施相互作用,从而提高吸收率。在对一项分组随机对照试验的定量数据进行二次分析时,我们拟合了多层次逻辑回归模型,以研究结果(对 HWB 计划的采纳情况)与员工人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、种族、教育水平)之间的关系。模型包括试验组(货币激励或对照组)与员工人口统计学之间的交互作用。结果表明,与对照组相比,激励组员工对 HWB 措施的接受程度相似(调整后 OR 1.11,CI 0.72,1.70,p = 0.64)。在对人口统计学因素的测试中,55 岁以上的员工与 17-24 岁的员工相比,其采纳率低 56% (CI 0.25, 0.76, p = 0.003)。在统计意义上,激励措施与其他员工人口统计群体之间没有明显的交互作用。组织层面的货币激励措施在效果上似乎并不因员工人口统计学特征的不同而有所区别,尽管一些子群体在试验中的代表性似乎不足,包括少数民族和教育程度低于学位水平的员工。中小型企业中的年长员工可能不太可能参与工作场所保健与健康倡议,因此在工作场所保健与健康倡议的实施、政策和研究方面可以将其作为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信