Evaluating the CELF-5 Screening Test and Vineland-3 for Identifying Language Difficulties in Autism and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1002/aur.70021
Vishnu Priya Mohanakumar Sindhu, Amanda Brignell, Mia Moses, Kathryn Kallady, Mark A. Bellgrove, Beth P. Johnson
{"title":"Evaluating the CELF-5 Screening Test and Vineland-3 for Identifying Language Difficulties in Autism and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder","authors":"Vishnu Priya Mohanakumar Sindhu,&nbsp;Amanda Brignell,&nbsp;Mia Moses,&nbsp;Kathryn Kallady,&nbsp;Mark A. Bellgrove,&nbsp;Beth P. Johnson","doi":"10.1002/aur.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Language screening tools are frequently used to identify children with potential undiagnosed language difficulties. These difficulties are more prevalent in autistic children and those with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to neurotypical peers. Despite the widespread use of tools like the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Fifth Edition Screening Test (CELF-5 Screener) and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland-3), their sensitivity and specificity for this population have not been empirically validated. This study aimed to evaluate the screening accuracy of the CELF-5 Screener and Vineland-3 in children diagnosed with autism and/or ADHD and compare their performance to the gold standard measure. The sample consisted of 132 participants (<i>n</i>\n <sub>autism</sub> = 25; <i>n</i>\n <sub>ADHD</sub> = 29, and <i>n</i>\n <sub>autism+ADHD</sub> = 78; <i>M</i>\n <sub>age in years</sub> = 9.6; % male = 59) from the Monash Autism-ADHD Genetics and Neurodevelopment Project. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CELF-5 Screener and Vineland-3 receptive and expressive language subdomain scores were compared against those of the clinician-administered CELF-5 receptive and expressive language composite scores. The screening accuracy of each tool was further evaluated through Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses and calculations of Youden's <i>J</i> statistic. The CELF-5 Screener demonstrated poor sensitivity for receptive language difficulties (35.6%) while demonstrating high specificity (95.3%). Similarly, for expressive language difficulties, the sensitivity was low (37.9%), and the specificity was high (91.1%). The Vineland-3 showed high sensitivity (93.3%) but low specificity (48%) for expressive language difficulties and inadequate sensitivity (80.9%) and specificity (22.4%) for receptive language difficulties. Both the CELF-5 Screener and Vineland-3 may miss a significant number of children with co-occurring language difficulties related to autism and/or ADHD. Examiners must understand these tools' strengths and limitations, especially when assessing neurodivergent children whose language development might not follow a normative trajectory.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 4","pages":"857-869"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language screening tools are frequently used to identify children with potential undiagnosed language difficulties. These difficulties are more prevalent in autistic children and those with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to neurotypical peers. Despite the widespread use of tools like the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Fifth Edition Screening Test (CELF-5 Screener) and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland-3), their sensitivity and specificity for this population have not been empirically validated. This study aimed to evaluate the screening accuracy of the CELF-5 Screener and Vineland-3 in children diagnosed with autism and/or ADHD and compare their performance to the gold standard measure. The sample consisted of 132 participants (n autism = 25; n ADHD = 29, and n autism+ADHD = 78; M age in years = 9.6; % male = 59) from the Monash Autism-ADHD Genetics and Neurodevelopment Project. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CELF-5 Screener and Vineland-3 receptive and expressive language subdomain scores were compared against those of the clinician-administered CELF-5 receptive and expressive language composite scores. The screening accuracy of each tool was further evaluated through Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses and calculations of Youden's J statistic. The CELF-5 Screener demonstrated poor sensitivity for receptive language difficulties (35.6%) while demonstrating high specificity (95.3%). Similarly, for expressive language difficulties, the sensitivity was low (37.9%), and the specificity was high (91.1%). The Vineland-3 showed high sensitivity (93.3%) but low specificity (48%) for expressive language difficulties and inadequate sensitivity (80.9%) and specificity (22.4%) for receptive language difficulties. Both the CELF-5 Screener and Vineland-3 may miss a significant number of children with co-occurring language difficulties related to autism and/or ADHD. Examiners must understand these tools' strengths and limitations, especially when assessing neurodivergent children whose language development might not follow a normative trajectory.

评估 CELF-5 筛选测试和 Vineland-3 用于识别自闭症和注意力缺陷多动障碍患者的语言障碍。
语言筛查工具经常用于识别潜在的未确诊的语言障碍儿童。与正常的同龄人相比,这些困难在自闭症儿童和患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童中更为普遍。尽管语言基础临床评估第五版筛选测试(CELF-5 Screener)和Vineland适应行为量表第三版(Vineland-3)等工具被广泛使用,但它们对这一人群的敏感性和特异性尚未得到实证验证。本研究旨在评估CELF-5和Vineland-3在诊断为自闭症和/或ADHD的儿童中的筛查准确性,并将其表现与金标准测量进行比较。样本包括132名参与者(nautism = 25;nADHD = 29, nautism+ADHD = 78;法师年数= 9.6;%男性= 59),来自莫纳什大学自闭症-多动症遗传与神经发育项目。将CELF-5 screen和Vineland-3接受性和表达性语言子域评分的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值与临床使用的CELF-5接受性和表达性语言综合评分进行比较。通过Receiver Operating Characteristic分析和Youden's J统计量的计算,进一步评估每种工具的筛选准确性。CELF-5筛查对接受性语言障碍的敏感性较差(35.6%),而特异性较高(95.3%)。同样,对于表达性语言障碍,敏感性低(37.9%),特异性高(91.1%)。Vineland-3对表达性语言障碍的敏感性(93.3%)高,特异性(48%)低,对接受性语言障碍的敏感性(80.9%)和特异性(22.4%)不足。CELF-5筛检和Vineland-3筛检可能会漏掉大量同时存在与自闭症和/或ADHD相关的语言障碍的儿童。审查员必须了解这些工具的优点和局限性,特别是在评估语言发展可能不遵循规范轨迹的神经分化儿童时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信