Can whole genome sequencing resolve taxonomic ambiguities in fungi? The case study of Colletotrichum associated with ferns.

IF 2.1 Q3 MYCOLOGY
Frontiers in fungal biology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ffunb.2025.1540469
Andrea Menicucci, Salvatore Iacono, Madalena Ramos, Chiara Fiorenzani, Natalia Aparecida Peres, Lavern Wayne Timmer, Antonio Prodi, Riccardo Baroncelli
{"title":"Can whole genome sequencing resolve taxonomic ambiguities in fungi? The case study of <i>Colletotrichum</i> associated with ferns.","authors":"Andrea Menicucci, Salvatore Iacono, Madalena Ramos, Chiara Fiorenzani, Natalia Aparecida Peres, Lavern Wayne Timmer, Antonio Prodi, Riccardo Baroncelli","doi":"10.3389/ffunb.2025.1540469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The genus <i>Colletotrichum</i> comprises numerous fungal species with diverse ecological roles, including plant pathogenic, endophytic, and saprophytic lifestyles. Accurate species identification is crucial for understanding host-pathogen interactions, disease epidemiology, and fungal ecology. However, taxonomic classification within <i>Colletotrichum</i> remains challenging due to genetic complexity and phenotypic plasticity. Conventional approaches such as single-gene analyses and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) frequently fail to resolve closely related taxa, leading to misidentifications that hinder species delimitation and comparative evolutionary studies. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offers a promising alternative by providing genome-wide resolution for phylogenetic analysis. This study investigates <i>Colletotrichum</i> isolates associated with the fern <i>Rumohra adiantiformis</i> and evaluates the effectiveness of WGS in addressing taxonomic uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 18 <i>Colletotrichum</i> isolates, including fern-associated strains, were analyzed. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq platform. High-quality genome assemblies were generated, and gene prediction was conducted using AUGUSTUS. Orthogroup assignment and phylogenomic analysis were performed based on single-copy orthologs, and phylogenetic trees were constructed using MLST and WGS-based approaches. Comparative analyses were carried out to assess the taxonomic resolution provided by WGS in relation to traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genome-wide phylogenomic analysis revealed distinct evolutionary lineages among <i>Colletotrichum</i> isolates that MLST failed to resolve, highlighting host and geographic differentiation. High-quality genome assemblies were obtained, with 98.3% of genes assigned to orthogroups, indicating strong genomic conservation. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed a close relationship between <i>Rumohra adiantiformis</i>-associated isolates and <i>Colletotrichum filicis</i>, reinforcing the effectiveness of WGS in species identification.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings demonstrate the superiority of WGS over MLST in resolving species boundaries and reconstructing evolutionary relationships. The enhanced resolution provided by genome-wide data enables more accurate taxonomic classification, reducing misidentifications and improving our understanding of fungal biodiversity. By refining <i>Colletotrichum</i> taxonomy, WGS facilitates ecological and pathogenic studies, offering a robust framework for future research in fungal systematics and plant pathology. As sequencing technologies continue to advance, WGS is expected to become a standard tool for fungal species delineation and evolutionary studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73084,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in fungal biology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1540469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in fungal biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2025.1540469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The genus Colletotrichum comprises numerous fungal species with diverse ecological roles, including plant pathogenic, endophytic, and saprophytic lifestyles. Accurate species identification is crucial for understanding host-pathogen interactions, disease epidemiology, and fungal ecology. However, taxonomic classification within Colletotrichum remains challenging due to genetic complexity and phenotypic plasticity. Conventional approaches such as single-gene analyses and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) frequently fail to resolve closely related taxa, leading to misidentifications that hinder species delimitation and comparative evolutionary studies. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offers a promising alternative by providing genome-wide resolution for phylogenetic analysis. This study investigates Colletotrichum isolates associated with the fern Rumohra adiantiformis and evaluates the effectiveness of WGS in addressing taxonomic uncertainties.

Methods: A total of 18 Colletotrichum isolates, including fern-associated strains, were analyzed. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq platform. High-quality genome assemblies were generated, and gene prediction was conducted using AUGUSTUS. Orthogroup assignment and phylogenomic analysis were performed based on single-copy orthologs, and phylogenetic trees were constructed using MLST and WGS-based approaches. Comparative analyses were carried out to assess the taxonomic resolution provided by WGS in relation to traditional methods.

Results: Genome-wide phylogenomic analysis revealed distinct evolutionary lineages among Colletotrichum isolates that MLST failed to resolve, highlighting host and geographic differentiation. High-quality genome assemblies were obtained, with 98.3% of genes assigned to orthogroups, indicating strong genomic conservation. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed a close relationship between Rumohra adiantiformis-associated isolates and Colletotrichum filicis, reinforcing the effectiveness of WGS in species identification.

Discussion: These findings demonstrate the superiority of WGS over MLST in resolving species boundaries and reconstructing evolutionary relationships. The enhanced resolution provided by genome-wide data enables more accurate taxonomic classification, reducing misidentifications and improving our understanding of fungal biodiversity. By refining Colletotrichum taxonomy, WGS facilitates ecological and pathogenic studies, offering a robust framework for future research in fungal systematics and plant pathology. As sequencing technologies continue to advance, WGS is expected to become a standard tool for fungal species delineation and evolutionary studies.

全基因组测序能解决真菌的分类歧义吗?蕨类植物炭疽病的个案研究。
简介:炭疽菌属真菌种类繁多,具有不同的生态作用,包括植物病原性、内生性和腐生性的生活方式。准确的物种鉴定对于理解宿主-病原体相互作用、疾病流行病学和真菌生态学至关重要。然而,由于炭疽菌的遗传复杂性和表型可塑性,其分类分类仍然具有挑战性。传统的方法,如单基因分析和多位点序列分型(MLST)往往不能解决密切相关的分类群,导致误认,阻碍物种划分和比较进化研究。全基因组测序(WGS)通过提供全基因组分辨率来进行系统发育分析,提供了一个有希望的替代方案。本研究研究了与辐射蕨相关的炭疽菌分离株,并评估了WGS在解决分类不确定性方面的有效性。方法:对18株炭疽菌进行分析,其中包括蕨类相关菌株。使用Illumina NovaSeq平台提取基因组DNA并进行测序。生成高质量的基因组组合,并使用AUGUSTUS进行基因预测。基于单拷贝直系同源进行正系群分配和系统发育分析,并利用MLST和基于wgs的方法构建系统发育树。对WGS提供的分类分辨率与传统方法进行了比较分析。结果:全基因组系统基因组分析揭示了炭疽杆菌分离株的不同进化谱系,这是MLST无法解决的,突出了宿主和地理差异。获得了高质量的基因组组合,98.3%的基因归属于正类群,表明具有很强的基因组保守性。系统发育分析证实了辐射变形rummohra - radiformis -associated菌株与炭疽菌(Colletotrichum filicis)亲缘关系密切,增强了WGS在物种鉴定中的有效性。讨论:这些发现表明WGS在解决物种边界和重建进化关系方面优于MLST。全基因组数据提供的增强分辨率使分类分类更加准确,减少了错误识别,提高了我们对真菌生物多样性的理解。通过完善炭疽菌的分类,WGS促进了生态学和病原学的研究,为未来真菌系统学和植物病理学的研究提供了强有力的框架。随着测序技术的不断进步,WGS有望成为真菌物种描述和进化研究的标准工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信