Characteristics of Evidenced-Based Falls Prevention Program Completers and Non-Completers and Difference in Outcomes.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Elizabeth W Regan, Kathleen Cameron, Angelica Herrera-Venson, Gardenia A Juarez, Subashan Perera, Jennifer Vincenzo, Jennifer S Brach
{"title":"Characteristics of Evidenced-Based Falls Prevention Program Completers and Non-Completers and Difference in Outcomes.","authors":"Elizabeth W Regan, Kathleen Cameron, Angelica Herrera-Venson, Gardenia A Juarez, Subashan Perera, Jennifer Vincenzo, Jennifer S Brach","doi":"10.1177/08982643251327032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidenced-based community falls prevention programs can reduce falls in older adults. We sought to (1) describe the characteristics of program participants who met completion criteria by receiving the full program dose (completers) versus those who did not (non-completers), and (2) determine the differences in outcomes (falls, fear of falling and physical function) between the two groups. Data from ten programs from 2014-2019 were evaluated. Completers were older and reported more fear of falling and lower perceived health at baseline. A higher proportion of completers had reduced falls, decreased fear of falling, and were more likely to take actions to reduce fall risk. Both groups improved in physical function with no evidence of a difference between groups. While completers gained a greater benefit, both groups demonstrated a fall risk reduction. A larger loss of non-completers to follow-up may have impacted results. Targeting programs for individuals may improve completion rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":51385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Health","volume":" ","pages":"8982643251327032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643251327032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidenced-based community falls prevention programs can reduce falls in older adults. We sought to (1) describe the characteristics of program participants who met completion criteria by receiving the full program dose (completers) versus those who did not (non-completers), and (2) determine the differences in outcomes (falls, fear of falling and physical function) between the two groups. Data from ten programs from 2014-2019 were evaluated. Completers were older and reported more fear of falling and lower perceived health at baseline. A higher proportion of completers had reduced falls, decreased fear of falling, and were more likely to take actions to reduce fall risk. Both groups improved in physical function with no evidence of a difference between groups. While completers gained a greater benefit, both groups demonstrated a fall risk reduction. A larger loss of non-completers to follow-up may have impacted results. Targeting programs for individuals may improve completion rates.

循证预防跌倒项目完成者和未完成者的特征及结果差异。
以证据为基础的社区跌倒预防项目可以减少老年人的跌倒。我们试图(1)通过接受完整的项目剂量来描述符合完成标准的项目参与者(完成者)与不符合完成标准的项目参与者(非完成者)的特征,以及(2)确定两组之间结果(跌倒,害怕跌倒和身体功能)的差异。对2014-2019年10个项目的数据进行了评估。完成者年龄较大,报告更害怕跌倒,基线健康状况较差。更高比例的完成者减少了跌倒,减少了对跌倒的恐惧,并且更有可能采取行动减少跌倒风险。两组患者的身体机能都得到了改善,没有证据表明两组之间存在差异。虽然完成锻炼的人获益更大,但两组人都表现出摔倒的风险降低。未完成随访的患者损失较大可能会影响结果。针对个人的项目可以提高完成率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Health is an interdisciplinary forum for the presentation of research findings and scholarly exchange in the area of aging and health. Manuscripts are sought that deal with social and behavioral factors related to health and aging. Disciplines represented include the behavioral and social sciences, public health, epidemiology, demography, health services research, nursing, social work, medicine, and related disciplines. Although preference is given to manuscripts presenting the findings of original research, review and methodological pieces will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信