Patients' experiences of living with Long Covid and their beliefs about the role of psychology in their condition.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Saara Petker, Jane Ogden
{"title":"Patients' experiences of living with Long Covid and their beliefs about the role of psychology in their condition.","authors":"Saara Petker, Jane Ogden","doi":"10.1177/13591053251325112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some patients with chronic conditions are unreceptive to a psychological approach. This study aimed to explore the experience of Long Covid (LC) with an emphasis on patients' beliefs about the role of psychology. UK participants (<i>n</i> = 14) with either self-reported or diagnosed LC took part in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis described three main themes: 'Living in uncertainty', 'Why should I trust you if you don't believe me?' and 'Once I know the cause people will believe me'. Transcending these themes was a tension between professional experts and experts by lived experience and a dichotomy between psychological and medical explanations. Overarching all themes was a sense that synthesising the biological and psychological components of LC could help to resolve this tension. In summary. living with LC is characterised by feeling disbelieved which can drive the rejection of psychology. Helping patients feel listened to may encourage a more positive approach to psychological support.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053251325112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251325112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some patients with chronic conditions are unreceptive to a psychological approach. This study aimed to explore the experience of Long Covid (LC) with an emphasis on patients' beliefs about the role of psychology. UK participants (n = 14) with either self-reported or diagnosed LC took part in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis described three main themes: 'Living in uncertainty', 'Why should I trust you if you don't believe me?' and 'Once I know the cause people will believe me'. Transcending these themes was a tension between professional experts and experts by lived experience and a dichotomy between psychological and medical explanations. Overarching all themes was a sense that synthesising the biological and psychological components of LC could help to resolve this tension. In summary. living with LC is characterised by feeling disbelieved which can drive the rejection of psychology. Helping patients feel listened to may encourage a more positive approach to psychological support.

长期Covid患者的生活经历以及他们对心理在其病情中的作用的看法。
一些慢性疾病患者不接受心理治疗。本研究旨在探讨长期Covid (LC)的经验,重点是患者对心理作用的信念。自我报告或诊断为LC的英国参与者(n = 14)参加了半结构化访谈。主题分析描述了三个主要主题:“生活在不确定性中”,“如果你不相信我,我为什么要相信你?”以及“一旦我知道原因,人们就会相信我”。超越这些主题的是专业专家和经验丰富的专家之间的紧张关系,以及心理和医学解释之间的二分法。最重要的是,综合LC的生物和心理成分可以帮助解决这种紧张关系。在总结。与LC一起生活的特点是感觉不被相信,这可能会导致心理排斥。帮助病人感到被倾听可能会鼓励更积极的心理支持方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信