Safety Leadership Training: Implementation and Effectiveness Evaluation in the Dairy Farm Industry.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Workplace Health & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1177/21650799251319313
David I Douphrate, Anabel Rodriguez, Pete Kines, Amir Hossein Javid, G Robert Hagevoort, Lisa Pompeii
{"title":"Safety Leadership Training: Implementation and Effectiveness Evaluation in the Dairy Farm Industry.","authors":"David I Douphrate, Anabel Rodriguez, Pete Kines, Amir Hossein Javid, G Robert Hagevoort, Lisa Pompeii","doi":"10.1177/21650799251319313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based interventions for the prevention of safety incidents at work are most effective when they include a focus on the hierarchy of controls. However, prior studies addressing the effects of safety leadership and safety climate are limited. The determination and adoption of evidence-based interventions specifically in the U.S. Agricultural, Forestry, and Fishing (AgFF) sector can be a challenge, and prior studies have shown a paucity of evidence-based occupational safety and health practices in the AgFF sector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 73 dairy farm supervisors from 27 U.S. farms to participate in a 12-module dairy leadership training program. We employed the Kirkpatrick Model (KM) to evaluate different levels of training effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participant reactions to the program were positive (KM level 1), and evaluation of knowledge gained among participants revealed 90% had learned new safety leadership information (KM level 2) that could be applied in their role as a dairy farm supervisor (KM level 3). Nearly 88% reported favorable experiences during their training participation. Post-training group interviews with supervisors (<i>n</i> = 21) provided information regarding training experiences and constructive feedback regarding opportunities for training improvement. Behavior change evaluation revealed nearly 50% of observed safety hazards on farms were related to livestock handling (21.6%), trips/falls (17.1%), and moving machinery (10.4%). The largest percentage of observed workplace conflicts were verbal (27.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions/application to practice: </strong>The application of the Kirkpatrick Model of training evaluation suggests participating dairy farm supervisors had positive experiences with the training program, and acquired safety hazard and workplace conflict identification skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":48968,"journal":{"name":"Workplace Health & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"310-319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799251319313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based interventions for the prevention of safety incidents at work are most effective when they include a focus on the hierarchy of controls. However, prior studies addressing the effects of safety leadership and safety climate are limited. The determination and adoption of evidence-based interventions specifically in the U.S. Agricultural, Forestry, and Fishing (AgFF) sector can be a challenge, and prior studies have shown a paucity of evidence-based occupational safety and health practices in the AgFF sector.

Methods: We enrolled 73 dairy farm supervisors from 27 U.S. farms to participate in a 12-module dairy leadership training program. We employed the Kirkpatrick Model (KM) to evaluate different levels of training effectiveness.

Findings: Participant reactions to the program were positive (KM level 1), and evaluation of knowledge gained among participants revealed 90% had learned new safety leadership information (KM level 2) that could be applied in their role as a dairy farm supervisor (KM level 3). Nearly 88% reported favorable experiences during their training participation. Post-training group interviews with supervisors (n = 21) provided information regarding training experiences and constructive feedback regarding opportunities for training improvement. Behavior change evaluation revealed nearly 50% of observed safety hazards on farms were related to livestock handling (21.6%), trips/falls (17.1%), and moving machinery (10.4%). The largest percentage of observed workplace conflicts were verbal (27.8%).

Conclusions/application to practice: The application of the Kirkpatrick Model of training evaluation suggests participating dairy farm supervisors had positive experiences with the training program, and acquired safety hazard and workplace conflict identification skills.

安全领导培训:在奶牛场行业的实施和有效性评估。
背景:当以证据为基础的干预措施包括对控制层次的关注时,预防工作中的安全事故是最有效的。然而,先前的研究解决安全领导和安全气候的影响是有限的。确定和采用以证据为基础的干预措施,特别是在美国农业、林业和渔业(AgFF)部门,可能是一个挑战,之前的研究表明,AgFF部门缺乏以证据为基础的职业安全和健康实践。方法:我们招募了来自27个美国农场的73名奶牛场主管参加了一个12个模块的奶牛场领导力培训项目。我们采用Kirkpatrick模型(KM)来评估不同层次的培训效果。研究结果:参与者对该计划的反应是积极的(知识管理水平1),参与者获得的知识评估显示,90%的参与者学习了新的安全领导信息(知识管理水平2),这些信息可以应用于他们作为奶牛场主管的角色(知识管理水平3)。近88%的参与者报告了他们在参加培训期间的良好经历。培训后与主管的小组访谈(n = 21)提供了关于培训经验的信息和关于培训改进机会的建设性反馈。行为改变评估显示,在农场观察到的安全危害中,近50%与牲畜处理(21.6%)、绊倒/跌倒(17.1%)和移动机械(10.4%)有关。在观察到的职场冲突中,言语冲突所占比例最大(27.8%)。结论/在实践中的应用:运用Kirkpatrick模型进行培训评估表明,参与培训的奶牛场监管人员对培训项目有积极的体验,并获得了安全隐患和工作场所冲突识别技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Workplace Health & Safety: Promoting Environments Conducive to Well-Being and Productivity is the official publication of the American Association of Occupational Health Nursing, Inc. (AAOHN). It is a scientific peer-reviewed Journal. Its purpose is to support and promote the practice of occupational and environmental health nurses by providing leading edge research findings and evidence-based clinical practices. It publishes articles that span the range of issues facing occupational and environmental health professionals, including emergency and all-hazard preparedness, health promotion, safety, productivity, environmental health, case management, workers'' compensation, business and leadership, compliance and information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信