Correction to "Vocational interests in the united states: Sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects" by Morris (2016).

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
{"title":"Correction to \"Vocational interests in the united states: Sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects\" by Morris (2016).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/cou0000790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"Vocational interests in the United States: Sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects\" by Michael L. Morris (<i>Journal of Counseling Psychology</i>, 2016[Oct], Vol 63[5], 604-615). In the article \"Vocational Interests in the United States: Sex, Age, Ethnicity, and Year Effects,\" by Michael L. Morris (Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2016, Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 604-615, https://doi .org/10.1037/cou0000164), errors related to the coding of two ethnicities, Black and Native American, resulted in some respondents being incorrectly recorded as the wrong ethnicity. A corrected analysis resulted in changes to the abstract, Participants section, Question 1, Question 5, Results section, and Discussion section and corrections to the values in Tables 3-6 in the main article and Tables 1, 2, and 13-22 in the online supplemental materials. The overall impact of these errors was minimal. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-36831-001.) Vocational interests predict educational and career choices, job performance, and career success (Rounds & Su, 2014). Although sex differences in vocational interests have long been observed (Thorndike, 1911), an appropriate overall measure has been lacking from the literature. Using a cross-sectional sample of United States residents aged 14 to 63 who completed the Strong Interest Inventory assessment between 2005 and 2014 (N = 1,283,110), I examined sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects on work related interest levels using both multivariate and univariate effect size estimates of individual dimensions (Holland's Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional). Men scored higher on Realistic (d = -1.14), Investigative (d = -.32), Enterprising (d = -.22), and Conventional (d = -.23), while women scored higher on Artistic (d = .19) and Social (d = .38), mostly replicating previous univariate findings. Multivariate, overall sex differences were very large (disattenuated Mahalanobis' D = 1.61; 27% overlap). Interest levels were slightly lower and overall sex differences larger in younger samples. Overall sex differences have narrowed slightly for 18-22 year-olds in more recent samples. Generally very small ethnicity effects included relatively higher Investigative and Enterprising scores for Asians, Indians, and Middle Easterners, lower Realistic scores for Blacks, higher Realistic, Artistic, and Social scores for Pacific Islanders, and lower Conventional scores for Whites. Using Prediger's (1982) model, women were more interested in people (d = 1.01) and ideas (d = .18), while men were more interested in things and data. These results, consistent with previous reviews showing large sex differences and small year effects, suggest that large sex differences in work related interests will continue to be observed for decades. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"72 2","pages":"191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000790","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reports an error in "Vocational interests in the United States: Sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects" by Michael L. Morris (Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2016[Oct], Vol 63[5], 604-615). In the article "Vocational Interests in the United States: Sex, Age, Ethnicity, and Year Effects," by Michael L. Morris (Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2016, Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 604-615, https://doi .org/10.1037/cou0000164), errors related to the coding of two ethnicities, Black and Native American, resulted in some respondents being incorrectly recorded as the wrong ethnicity. A corrected analysis resulted in changes to the abstract, Participants section, Question 1, Question 5, Results section, and Discussion section and corrections to the values in Tables 3-6 in the main article and Tables 1, 2, and 13-22 in the online supplemental materials. The overall impact of these errors was minimal. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-36831-001.) Vocational interests predict educational and career choices, job performance, and career success (Rounds & Su, 2014). Although sex differences in vocational interests have long been observed (Thorndike, 1911), an appropriate overall measure has been lacking from the literature. Using a cross-sectional sample of United States residents aged 14 to 63 who completed the Strong Interest Inventory assessment between 2005 and 2014 (N = 1,283,110), I examined sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects on work related interest levels using both multivariate and univariate effect size estimates of individual dimensions (Holland's Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional). Men scored higher on Realistic (d = -1.14), Investigative (d = -.32), Enterprising (d = -.22), and Conventional (d = -.23), while women scored higher on Artistic (d = .19) and Social (d = .38), mostly replicating previous univariate findings. Multivariate, overall sex differences were very large (disattenuated Mahalanobis' D = 1.61; 27% overlap). Interest levels were slightly lower and overall sex differences larger in younger samples. Overall sex differences have narrowed slightly for 18-22 year-olds in more recent samples. Generally very small ethnicity effects included relatively higher Investigative and Enterprising scores for Asians, Indians, and Middle Easterners, lower Realistic scores for Blacks, higher Realistic, Artistic, and Social scores for Pacific Islanders, and lower Conventional scores for Whites. Using Prediger's (1982) model, women were more interested in people (d = 1.01) and ideas (d = .18), while men were more interested in things and data. These results, consistent with previous reviews showing large sex differences and small year effects, suggest that large sex differences in work related interests will continue to be observed for decades. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

莫里斯(2016)对“美国职业兴趣:性别、年龄、种族和年份影响”的更正。
Michael L. Morris在《美国职业兴趣:性别、年龄、种族和年份的影响》(《咨询心理学杂志》,2016[10],Vol . 63 bbb, 604-615)中报告了一个错误。在Michael L. Morris的文章《美国职业兴趣:性别、年龄、种族和年份影响》(《咨询心理学杂志》,2016年,第63卷,第5期,第604-615页,https://doi .org/10.1037/cou0000164)中,与黑人和美洲原住民这两个种族的编码有关的错误导致一些受访者被错误地记录为错误的种族。修正后的分析对摘要、参与者部分、问题1、问题5、结果部分和讨论部分进行了修改,并对主要文章中的表3-6和在线补充材料中的表1、2和13-22中的值进行了修正。这些错误的总体影响是最小的。本文的在线版本已被更正。(原文摘要见记录2016-36831-001)职业兴趣可以预测教育和职业选择、工作表现和职业成功(Rounds & Su, 2014)。虽然职业兴趣的性别差异早已被观察到(Thorndike, 1911),但从文献中缺乏适当的总体衡量标准。使用在2005年至2014年期间完成强烈兴趣清单评估的14至63岁美国居民的横截面样本(N = 1,283,110),我使用个人维度(荷兰的现实主义,调查,艺术,社会,进取和传统)的多变量和单变量效应大小估计来检查性别,年龄,种族和年份对工作相关兴趣水平的影响。男性在现实(d = -1.14)、调查(d = - 0.32)、进取(d = - 0.22)和传统(d = - 0.23)方面得分较高,而女性在艺术(d = 0.19)和社会(d = 0.38)方面得分较高,大部分重复了之前的单变量研究结果。多变量分析显示,总体性别差异非常大(消弱马氏马氏体的D = 1.61;27%重叠)。在年轻的样本中,兴趣水平略低,总体性别差异较大。在最近的样本中,18-22岁人群的总体性别差异略有缩小。一般来说,非常小的种族影响包括亚洲人、印度人和中东人的调查和进取得分相对较高,黑人的现实主义得分较低,太平洋岛民的现实主义、艺术和社会得分较高,白人的传统得分较低。使用Prediger(1982)的模型,女性对人(d = 1.01)和想法(d = 0.18)更感兴趣,而男性对事物和数据更感兴趣。这些结果与先前的研究结果一致,表明在工作相关兴趣方面的巨大性别差异将在未来几十年继续观察到。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信