Improving lexico-semantic integration with gesture-enriched pictures: A word-learning study using the Picture-Word Interference paradigm.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Solène Kalénine, Laurent Ott, Séverine Casalis
{"title":"Improving lexico-semantic integration with gesture-enriched pictures: A word-learning study using the Picture-Word Interference paradigm.","authors":"Solène Kalénine, Laurent Ott, Séverine Casalis","doi":"10.3758/s13421-025-01701-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of static gesture cues on word learning and integration. Following embodied theories of language, gesture-enhanced images displaying the object-use gesture should favor learning and integration of object nouns. Sixty-two adult French speakers learned low-familiarity French nouns of manipulable objects (e.g., \"étrille\" - currycomb) with gesture-enhanced or neutral images during a short learning session. Immediately after, word recognition (lexical decision) and word production (Picture-Word Interference, PWI) tasks were used to evaluate the impact of image type on word learning and lexical integration, respectively. In the PWI, participants had to name a picture of a familiar object (e.g. \"brosse\" - brush) while ignoring a written distractor word. Words learned with gesture-enhanced or neutral images were used as distractors. Depending on the condition, they could be semantically related (\"étrille\" - currycomb) or unrelated (\"burin\" - chisel) to the target object to name. A control condition with unrelated distractor words not involved in learning (\"salière\" - salt shaker) was also added. Naming latencies in presence of related distractors, compared to unrelated distractors, indicated whether learned lexical representations engaged in competition during production. Lexical decision results did not show any influence of the image condition used during learning on word recognition. Critically, however, PWI results demonstrated that words trained with gesture-enhanced pictures entailed semantic interference effects during naming. Words trained with neutral pictures did not induce semantic interference. Findings highlight the relevance of gesture cues for lexico-semantic integration of object nouns and suggest considering the role of contextual images in vocabulary acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01701-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of static gesture cues on word learning and integration. Following embodied theories of language, gesture-enhanced images displaying the object-use gesture should favor learning and integration of object nouns. Sixty-two adult French speakers learned low-familiarity French nouns of manipulable objects (e.g., "étrille" - currycomb) with gesture-enhanced or neutral images during a short learning session. Immediately after, word recognition (lexical decision) and word production (Picture-Word Interference, PWI) tasks were used to evaluate the impact of image type on word learning and lexical integration, respectively. In the PWI, participants had to name a picture of a familiar object (e.g. "brosse" - brush) while ignoring a written distractor word. Words learned with gesture-enhanced or neutral images were used as distractors. Depending on the condition, they could be semantically related ("étrille" - currycomb) or unrelated ("burin" - chisel) to the target object to name. A control condition with unrelated distractor words not involved in learning ("salière" - salt shaker) was also added. Naming latencies in presence of related distractors, compared to unrelated distractors, indicated whether learned lexical representations engaged in competition during production. Lexical decision results did not show any influence of the image condition used during learning on word recognition. Critically, however, PWI results demonstrated that words trained with gesture-enhanced pictures entailed semantic interference effects during naming. Words trained with neutral pictures did not induce semantic interference. Findings highlight the relevance of gesture cues for lexico-semantic integration of object nouns and suggest considering the role of contextual images in vocabulary acquisition.

用手势丰富的图片提高词汇语义整合:一个使用图片-文字干扰范式的单词学习研究。
本研究旨在评估静态手势提示对单词学习和整合的影响。根据语言具身理论,显示物体使用手势的手势增强图像应该有利于物体名词的学习和整合。在一个简短的学习过程中,62名说法语的成年人通过手势增强或中性的图像学习了可操作物体的不熟悉的法语名词(例如,“”- currycomb)。随后,分别使用单词识别(词汇决策)和单词生成(图片-单词干扰,PWI)任务来评估图像类型对单词学习和词汇整合的影响。在PWI中,参与者必须说出一张熟悉物体的图片(例如:“brosse”——刷),同时忽略一个书面的干扰词。通过手势增强或中性图像学习的单词被用作干扰物。根据不同的情况,它们可能在语义上与要命名的目标对象相关(如“前程”——马蜂窝)或无关(如“燃烧”——凿子)。另外,还添加了一个与学习无关的干扰词(“sali”-盐瓶)的控制条件。与不相关的干扰物相比,相关干扰物存在时的命名潜伏期表明习得的词汇表征在产生过程中是否参与竞争。词汇决策结果显示,在学习过程中使用的图像条件对单词识别没有任何影响。然而,关键的是,PWI结果表明,用手势增强图片训练的单词在命名过程中会产生语义干扰效应。用中性图片训练的单词不会引起语义干扰。研究结果强调了手势提示与对象名词词汇语义整合的相关性,并建议考虑语境图像在词汇习得中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信