On the place of educational theory in the professional development of clinical educators.

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Tim Clement
{"title":"On the place of educational theory in the professional development of clinical educators.","authors":"Tim Clement","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2025.2475348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different views exist about the training needs of new clinical educators and how they might be met. This contributes to the variably of early professional development offerings. One area of contention concerns the value of educational theory. A paper published in this journal questioned the importance of educational theory in delivering effective GP training and the authors claimed that they had been unable to find an explicit exploration of this issue. If we look to another field - teacher training - the place of educational theory has been thoroughly explored. Leading teacher educators have reported how unsuccessful the 'theory-first' approach has been in influencing teachers' practice and improving pupils' education. 'Realistic teacher education' is proposed as an alternative, which starts from student teachers' practical experiences and the needs and concerns that arise from them. This 'theory-later' approach has influenced novel forms of professional development for clinical educators, where theory is introduced if it is perceived as being relevant to the teaching and learning problems under discussion. This requires facilitators who are comfortable in working from practice to theory. Forsaking a 'theory-first' approach in foundational courses should not make educational theory disappear but prompts course designers to ask if it is better placed in subsequent professional development offerings when clinical educators have had some teaching experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2475348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different views exist about the training needs of new clinical educators and how they might be met. This contributes to the variably of early professional development offerings. One area of contention concerns the value of educational theory. A paper published in this journal questioned the importance of educational theory in delivering effective GP training and the authors claimed that they had been unable to find an explicit exploration of this issue. If we look to another field - teacher training - the place of educational theory has been thoroughly explored. Leading teacher educators have reported how unsuccessful the 'theory-first' approach has been in influencing teachers' practice and improving pupils' education. 'Realistic teacher education' is proposed as an alternative, which starts from student teachers' practical experiences and the needs and concerns that arise from them. This 'theory-later' approach has influenced novel forms of professional development for clinical educators, where theory is introduced if it is perceived as being relevant to the teaching and learning problems under discussion. This requires facilitators who are comfortable in working from practice to theory. Forsaking a 'theory-first' approach in foundational courses should not make educational theory disappear but prompts course designers to ask if it is better placed in subsequent professional development offerings when clinical educators have had some teaching experience.

论教育理论在临床教育工作者专业发展中的地位。
关于新临床教育工作者的培训需求以及如何满足这些需求存在不同的观点。这导致了早期专业发展产品的多样性。争论的一个领域涉及教育理论的价值。发表在该杂志上的一篇论文质疑教育理论在提供有效的全科医生培训中的重要性,作者声称他们无法找到对这个问题的明确探索。如果我们看看另一个领域——教师培训——教育理论的地位已经得到了彻底的探索。著名的教师教育家报告说,“理论优先”的方法在影响教师的实践和改善学生的教育方面是多么的不成功。“现实主义教师教育”是另一种选择,它从学生教师的实践经验以及由此产生的需求和担忧出发。这种“先理论后”的方法影响了临床教育工作者专业发展的新形式,如果理论被认为与正在讨论的教学问题相关,就会被引入。这就要求引导者能够从实践到理论的融会贯通。在基础课程中放弃“理论优先”的方法并不会使教育理论消失,但会促使课程设计者提出这样的问题:当临床教育工作者有一定的教学经验时,教育理论是否更好地放在后续的专业发展课程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信