Confidence in China's healthcare system: a focus on lower-middle class.

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yifan Jiang, Bin Peng, Dandan Jin, Xinxin Peng, Jinghua Zhang
{"title":"Confidence in China's healthcare system: a focus on lower-middle class.","authors":"Yifan Jiang, Bin Peng, Dandan Jin, Xinxin Peng, Jinghua Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00608-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the post-pandemic era, there has been growing anxiety regarding health security, especially among the middle class worldwide. The public's confidence in the healthcare system encompasses their expectations and perceptions of the healthcare system's ability to meet their needs without financial hardship. This study aims to examine the disparities of confidence and to identify potential vulnerable subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adopting the China General Social Survey (CGSS) 2021, we performed multivariate logistic regression to analyze the associations between confidence level and socioeconomic classes, controlling for demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all respondents (n = 2341), 71% reported confidence. However, respondents identified as lower-middle class had the least likelihood of reporting confidence (OR = 0.64, p = 0.006) compared to the lowest social class. De facto married respondents had 21% lower odds of confidence (OR = 0.78, p = 0.046) compared to unpartnered respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal that, contrary to expectations, the lower-middle class in China-rather than the lowest social strata-exhibits the least confidence in the healthcare system. This low confidence appears closely linked to heightened insecurity about downward social mobility stemming from catastrophic healthcare expenditure. Moreover, married individuals also revealed low level of confidence in the healthcare system. These results underscore the urgent need for universal healthcare policies in China and similar emerging economies that specifically address the unique health security concerns of the lower-middle class and consider the dynamics inherent in marriages and families associated.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00608-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the post-pandemic era, there has been growing anxiety regarding health security, especially among the middle class worldwide. The public's confidence in the healthcare system encompasses their expectations and perceptions of the healthcare system's ability to meet their needs without financial hardship. This study aims to examine the disparities of confidence and to identify potential vulnerable subgroups.

Methods: Adopting the China General Social Survey (CGSS) 2021, we performed multivariate logistic regression to analyze the associations between confidence level and socioeconomic classes, controlling for demographics.

Results: Among all respondents (n = 2341), 71% reported confidence. However, respondents identified as lower-middle class had the least likelihood of reporting confidence (OR = 0.64, p = 0.006) compared to the lowest social class. De facto married respondents had 21% lower odds of confidence (OR = 0.78, p = 0.046) compared to unpartnered respondents.

Conclusions: Our findings reveal that, contrary to expectations, the lower-middle class in China-rather than the lowest social strata-exhibits the least confidence in the healthcare system. This low confidence appears closely linked to heightened insecurity about downward social mobility stemming from catastrophic healthcare expenditure. Moreover, married individuals also revealed low level of confidence in the healthcare system. These results underscore the urgent need for universal healthcare policies in China and similar emerging economies that specifically address the unique health security concerns of the lower-middle class and consider the dynamics inherent in marriages and families associated.

背景:在后大流行病时代,人们对医疗安全的焦虑与日俱增,尤其是全球的中产阶级。公众对医疗保健系统的信心包括他们对医疗保健系统在不造成经济困难的情况下满足其需求的能力的期望和看法。本研究旨在探讨信心的差异,并识别潜在的弱势亚群体:方法:采用 2021 年中国社会总体调查(CGSS)的数据,在控制人口统计学因素的前提下,对信心水平与社会经济阶层之间的关系进行多元逻辑回归分析:在所有受访者(n = 2341)中,71%的人表示有信心。然而,与最低社会阶层相比,被认定为中下阶层的受访者报告自信的可能性最小(OR = 0.64,p = 0.006)。与没有伴侣的受访者相比,已婚受访者的自信几率要低 21%(OR = 0.78,p = 0.046):我们的研究结果表明,与预期相反,中国的中下层而非最低社会阶层对医疗系统的信心最低。这种低信心似乎与灾难性医疗支出导致的社会向下流动的高度不安全感密切相关。此外,已婚人士对医疗系统的信心也很低。这些结果表明,中国和类似新兴经济体迫切需要制定全民医疗保健政策,以专门解决中下层阶级独特的健康安全问题,并考虑与之相关的婚姻和家庭固有的动态变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信