Ask the Parent: Developing a Pediatric Feedback Form for Medical Learners.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sarah-Marie Durr, Sanjida Newaz, Susan Petryk
{"title":"Ask the Parent: Developing a Pediatric Feedback Form for Medical Learners.","authors":"Sarah-Marie Durr, Sanjida Newaz, Susan Petryk","doi":"10.1177/23821205251327375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-centered medicine prioritizes patients' perspective to actively involve them in their care. Medical education and assessments must reflect this approach. Current patient feedback forms for medical learners are designed for the adult patient and are thus not suited for pediatrics. We aimed to determine if parents/caregivers and simulated patients (SPs) are willing to provide feedback to medical learners and if learners would be receptive to this feedback. We then identified which specific feedback caregivers, SPs, and learners consider most important.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>REDCap surveys were emailed to caregivers whose child had been seen at Child and Youth Services in Regina, Saskatchewan, from 2020 to June 2023, and to University of Saskatchewan (USask) SPs. Another survey was sent to USask medical students and family medicine and pediatric residents. Surveys asked what specific feedback each group would most prefer to give (caregivers/SPs) or receive (learners) using a Likert scale to rate importance. Descriptive statistics were computed using R software. The highest-ranked options were combined to form a single questionnaire to be given following a clinical encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three groups agree that medical learners should receive feedback from sources beyond physicians alone (caregivers: 73.6%, SPs: 89.5%, and learners: 88.9%). The five most highly rated areas for feedback were \"explains things clearly,\" \"involves me in the decisions about the medical plans (for my child),\" \"addresses my concerns and takes them seriously,\" \"listens and gives their full attention,\" and \"did or said anything that made me (or my child) uncomfortable.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three groups overwhelmingly agree that caregivers/patients should provide feedback on learners' clinical skills, confirming the utility of a pediatric feedback form. The most important areas of feedback identified were consolidated into a user-friendly feedback form consisting of five questions with a Likert-scale rating plus a section for free written narrative feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251327375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251327375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-centered medicine prioritizes patients' perspective to actively involve them in their care. Medical education and assessments must reflect this approach. Current patient feedback forms for medical learners are designed for the adult patient and are thus not suited for pediatrics. We aimed to determine if parents/caregivers and simulated patients (SPs) are willing to provide feedback to medical learners and if learners would be receptive to this feedback. We then identified which specific feedback caregivers, SPs, and learners consider most important.

Methods: REDCap surveys were emailed to caregivers whose child had been seen at Child and Youth Services in Regina, Saskatchewan, from 2020 to June 2023, and to University of Saskatchewan (USask) SPs. Another survey was sent to USask medical students and family medicine and pediatric residents. Surveys asked what specific feedback each group would most prefer to give (caregivers/SPs) or receive (learners) using a Likert scale to rate importance. Descriptive statistics were computed using R software. The highest-ranked options were combined to form a single questionnaire to be given following a clinical encounter.

Results: All three groups agree that medical learners should receive feedback from sources beyond physicians alone (caregivers: 73.6%, SPs: 89.5%, and learners: 88.9%). The five most highly rated areas for feedback were "explains things clearly," "involves me in the decisions about the medical plans (for my child)," "addresses my concerns and takes them seriously," "listens and gives their full attention," and "did or said anything that made me (or my child) uncomfortable."

Conclusions: All three groups overwhelmingly agree that caregivers/patients should provide feedback on learners' clinical skills, confirming the utility of a pediatric feedback form. The most important areas of feedback identified were consolidated into a user-friendly feedback form consisting of five questions with a Likert-scale rating plus a section for free written narrative feedback.

问家长:为医学学习者开发儿科反馈表。
背景:以患者为中心的医学优先考虑患者的观点,积极参与他们的护理。医学教育和评估必须反映这种方法。目前医学学习者的患者反馈表格是为成人患者设计的,因此不适合儿科。我们的目的是确定父母/照顾者和模拟患者(SPs)是否愿意向医学学习者提供反馈,以及学习者是否会接受这种反馈。然后,我们确定了看护人、sp和学习者认为最重要的具体反馈。方法:REDCap调查通过电子邮件发送给2020年至2023年6月期间在萨斯喀彻温省里贾纳儿童和青年服务中心看过孩子的看护者,以及萨斯喀彻温大学(USask) SPs。另一份调查发给了USask医学院学生、家庭医学和儿科住院医生。调查询问每个组最喜欢给予(照顾者/SPs)或接受(学习者)的具体反馈,使用李克特量表来评估重要性。描述性统计采用R软件计算。排名最高的选项被合并成一份问卷,在临床接触后给出。结果:所有三个群体都同意医学学习者应该从医生之外的来源获得反馈(护理人员:73.6%,SPs: 89.5%,学习者:88.9%)。评价最高的五个方面是“清楚地解释事情”、“让我参与(孩子的)医疗计划的决定”、“解决我的担忧并认真对待”、“倾听并给予他们充分的关注”和“做了或说了任何让我(或我的孩子)不舒服的事情”。结论:所有三组压倒性地同意护理人员/患者应该提供对学习者临床技能的反馈,确认儿科反馈表的效用。确定的最重要的反馈领域被整合到一个用户友好的反馈表格中,该表格由五个问题组成,带有李克特量表评分,以及一个免费的书面叙述反馈部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信