Long-Term Bladder, Bowel, and Ambulatory Function After Sacrectomy Surgery.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005326
Joshua M Coan, Jordan O Gasho, Joseph J Connolly, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, Kevin A Raskin, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert
{"title":"Long-Term Bladder, Bowel, and Ambulatory Function After Sacrectomy Surgery.","authors":"Joshua M Coan, Jordan O Gasho, Joseph J Connolly, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, Kevin A Raskin, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function in patients receiving sacral tumor resection surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Sacral tumors are rare and slow growing, often leading to late diagnoses and large tumor size. Surgical resection is the standard of care, and frequently involves nerve root sacrifice. These structures are important for bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function, and previous studies have limited follow-up. Hence, little is known regarding how sacral nerve function changes over time after sacrectomy surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who received surgery at our institution. Patients were stratified into groups based on osteotomy level (intralesional, low, mid, and high). Descriptive statistics were calculated with point estimates. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare oncologic, surgical, and functional outcomes across sacrectomy groups. Cumulative link mixed models (CLMMs) were used to assess functional trends over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences in preoperative and 1-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between 1-year and 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P=0.99, P=0.80, and P=0.72). At 5-years, bladder function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.04 and P=0.002). At 5-years, bowel function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.01 and P=0.01). At 5-years, ambulatory function was significantly better in the low sacrectomy versus the high sacrectomy group (P=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As expected, higher osteotomy level was associated with poorer function. Bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function was shown to stabilize at 1-year postoperatively. This can serve as an assessment point for long-term function and can help set patient expectations after surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To assess 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function in patients receiving sacral tumor resection surgery.

Summary of background data: Sacral tumors are rare and slow growing, often leading to late diagnoses and large tumor size. Surgical resection is the standard of care, and frequently involves nerve root sacrifice. These structures are important for bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function, and previous studies have limited follow-up. Hence, little is known regarding how sacral nerve function changes over time after sacrectomy surgery.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who received surgery at our institution. Patients were stratified into groups based on osteotomy level (intralesional, low, mid, and high). Descriptive statistics were calculated with point estimates. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare oncologic, surgical, and functional outcomes across sacrectomy groups. Cumulative link mixed models (CLMMs) were used to assess functional trends over time.

Results: There were significant differences in preoperative and 1-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between 1-year and 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P=0.99, P=0.80, and P=0.72). At 5-years, bladder function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.04 and P=0.002). At 5-years, bowel function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.01 and P=0.01). At 5-years, ambulatory function was significantly better in the low sacrectomy versus the high sacrectomy group (P=0.006).

Conclusion: As expected, higher osteotomy level was associated with poorer function. Bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function was shown to stabilize at 1-year postoperatively. This can serve as an assessment point for long-term function and can help set patient expectations after surgery.

Level of evidence: Level III, cohort study.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信