Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ferric Carboxymaltose and Iron Sucrose in Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
{"title":"Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ferric Carboxymaltose and Iron Sucrose in Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Lokman H Tanrıverdi, Ahmet Sarıcı","doi":"10.4274/tjh.galenos.2025.2025.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To comprehensively compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of two commonly used intravenous iron preparations, ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) and iron sucrose (IS), in adult patients with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to Jan 1, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials directly comparing FCM and IS treatments in adult patients with IDA. Primary outcome was change in hemoglobin levels during folllow-up. Meta-analyses were conducted with inverse variance random effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen trials were included, with a total of 4757 patients. FCM resulted in a nonsignificant increase in hemoglobin levels (mean difference [MD] = 0.45 g/dL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08 to 0.83, p=0.02) and ferritin levels (MD = 37.32 ng/mL, 95% CI = 18.98 to 55.65, p<0.01) compared to IS. FCM was associated with a higher risk of hypersensitivity reactions compared to IS (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.35-6.52, p<0.01) but showed no significant difference in severe adverse events (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.88-1.21, p=0.70) and had a nonsignificant increased risk of hypophosphatemia (RR: 2.84, 95% CI: 0.89-9.06, p=0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ten studies showed some concerns of risk of bias, and four studies had a high risk of bias for the change in hemoglobin levels during follow-up. Lack of standardized definitions for hypersensitivity reactions and variability in dosing protocols and follow-up durations across studies may affect the generalizability of our safety findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23362,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2025.2025.0034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To comprehensively compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of two commonly used intravenous iron preparations, ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) and iron sucrose (IS), in adult patients with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA).
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to Jan 1, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials directly comparing FCM and IS treatments in adult patients with IDA. Primary outcome was change in hemoglobin levels during folllow-up. Meta-analyses were conducted with inverse variance random effects models.
Results: Fourteen trials were included, with a total of 4757 patients. FCM resulted in a nonsignificant increase in hemoglobin levels (mean difference [MD] = 0.45 g/dL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08 to 0.83, p=0.02) and ferritin levels (MD = 37.32 ng/mL, 95% CI = 18.98 to 55.65, p<0.01) compared to IS. FCM was associated with a higher risk of hypersensitivity reactions compared to IS (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.35-6.52, p<0.01) but showed no significant difference in severe adverse events (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.88-1.21, p=0.70) and had a nonsignificant increased risk of hypophosphatemia (RR: 2.84, 95% CI: 0.89-9.06, p=0.08).
Conclusions: Ten studies showed some concerns of risk of bias, and four studies had a high risk of bias for the change in hemoglobin levels during follow-up. Lack of standardized definitions for hypersensitivity reactions and variability in dosing protocols and follow-up durations across studies may affect the generalizability of our safety findings.
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Hematology is published quarterly (March, June, September, and December) by the Turkish Society of Hematology. It is an independent, non-profit peer-reviewed international English-language periodical encompassing subjects relevant to hematology.
The Editorial Board of The Turkish Journal of Hematology adheres to the principles of the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE).
The aim of The Turkish Journal of Hematology is to publish original hematological research of the highest scientific quality and clinical relevance. Additionally, educational material, reviews on basic developments, editorial short notes, images in hematology, and letters from hematology specialists and clinicians covering their experience and comments on hematology and related medical fields as well as social subjects are published. As of December 2015, The Turkish Journal of Hematology does not accept case reports. Important new findings or data about interesting hematological cases may be submitted as a brief report.