Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives.

IF 1.4 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical Optometry Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTO.S494911
Anantha Krishnan, Ananya Dutta, Alok Srivastava, Nagaraju Konda, Ruby Kala Prakasam
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Anantha Krishnan, Ananya Dutta, Alok Srivastava, Nagaraju Konda, Ruby Kala Prakasam","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S494911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the global shortage of eye care professionals and the increasing burden of vision impairment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, there is an urgent need for innovative solutions to bridge gaps in eye care services. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) over recent decades have significantly impacted healthcare, including the field of optometry. When integrated into optometric workflows, AI has the potential to streamline decision-making processes and enhance system efficiency. To realize this potential, it is essential to develop AI models that can improve each stage of the patient care workflow, including screening, detection, diagnosis, and management. This review explores the application of AI in optometry, focusing on its potential to optimize various aspects of patient care. We examined AI models across key areas in optometry. Our analysis considered crucial parameters, including model selection, sample sizes for training and validation, evaluation metrics, and the explainability of the models. This comprehensive review identified both the strengths and weaknesses of existing AI models. The majority of image-based studies utilized CNN or transfer learning models, while clinical data-based studies primarily employed RF, SVM, and XGBoost. In general, AI models trained on large datasets achieved higher accuracy. However, many optometry-focused models faced limitations due to insufficient sample sizes-28% of studies were trained on fewer than 500 samples, 18% used fewer than 200 samples, and over half validated their models on fewer than 500 samples, with 38% validating on fewer than 200. Additionally, some studies that used the same data for both training and validation experienced overfitting, leading to reduced accuracy. Notably, 20% of the included studies reported accuracy below 80%, limiting their practical applicability in clinical settings. This review provides optometrists with valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of AI models in the field, aiding in their informed implementation in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"17 ","pages":"83-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S494911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the global shortage of eye care professionals and the increasing burden of vision impairment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, there is an urgent need for innovative solutions to bridge gaps in eye care services. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) over recent decades have significantly impacted healthcare, including the field of optometry. When integrated into optometric workflows, AI has the potential to streamline decision-making processes and enhance system efficiency. To realize this potential, it is essential to develop AI models that can improve each stage of the patient care workflow, including screening, detection, diagnosis, and management. This review explores the application of AI in optometry, focusing on its potential to optimize various aspects of patient care. We examined AI models across key areas in optometry. Our analysis considered crucial parameters, including model selection, sample sizes for training and validation, evaluation metrics, and the explainability of the models. This comprehensive review identified both the strengths and weaknesses of existing AI models. The majority of image-based studies utilized CNN or transfer learning models, while clinical data-based studies primarily employed RF, SVM, and XGBoost. In general, AI models trained on large datasets achieved higher accuracy. However, many optometry-focused models faced limitations due to insufficient sample sizes-28% of studies were trained on fewer than 500 samples, 18% used fewer than 200 samples, and over half validated their models on fewer than 500 samples, with 38% validating on fewer than 200. Additionally, some studies that used the same data for both training and validation experienced overfitting, leading to reduced accuracy. Notably, 20% of the included studies reported accuracy below 80%, limiting their practical applicability in clinical settings. This review provides optometrists with valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of AI models in the field, aiding in their informed implementation in clinical settings.

人工智能在验光中的应用:当前和未来展望。
随着全球眼科保健专业人员的短缺和视力损害负担的增加,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,迫切需要创新的解决方案来弥合眼科保健服务方面的差距。近几十年来,人工智能(AI)的进步对包括验光在内的医疗保健领域产生了重大影响。当集成到验光工作流程中时,人工智能有可能简化决策过程并提高系统效率。为了实现这一潜力,必须开发能够改善患者护理工作流程每个阶段的人工智能模型,包括筛查、检测、诊断和管理。这篇综述探讨了人工智能在验光中的应用,重点是它在优化患者护理各个方面的潜力。我们研究了验光关键领域的人工智能模型。我们的分析考虑了关键参数,包括模型选择、训练和验证的样本量、评估指标和模型的可解释性。这项全面的审查确定了现有人工智能模型的优点和缺点。大多数基于图像的研究使用CNN或迁移学习模型,而基于临床数据的研究主要使用RF、SVM和XGBoost。一般来说,在大型数据集上训练的人工智能模型具有更高的准确性。然而,许多以验光为重点的模型由于样本量不足而面临局限性——28%的研究在少于500个样本上进行了训练,18%的研究使用少于200个样本,超过一半的研究在少于500个样本上验证了他们的模型,38%的研究在少于200个样本上验证了他们的模型。此外,一些使用相同数据进行训练和验证的研究经历了过拟合,导致准确性降低。值得注意的是,纳入的研究中有20%的准确性低于80%,限制了它们在临床环境中的实际适用性。这篇综述为验光师提供了有价值的见解,了解人工智能模型在该领域的优缺点,帮助他们在临床环境中明智地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Optometry
Clinical Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信