Oral hygiene behavior and toothbrushing skills: results of the 6th German Oral Health Study (DMS • 6).

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Renate Deinzer, A Rainer Jordan, Kathrin Kuhr, Jutta Margraf-Stiksrud
{"title":"Oral hygiene behavior and toothbrushing skills: results of the 6th German Oral Health Study (DMS • 6).","authors":"Renate Deinzer, A Rainer Jordan, Kathrin Kuhr, Jutta Margraf-Stiksrud","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5982011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Past German Oral Health Studies (DMS) have revealed that toothbrushing patterns - a behavioral index comprising toothbrushing frequency, duration and timing - have steadily improved over the previous decades. What has not yet been investigated, however, are toothbrushing skills, ie, the ability to achieve oral cleanliness by removing all plaque deposits.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>All participants of the DMS • 6 from the age groups of 12-year-olds, 35- to 44-year-olds, and 65- to 74-year-olds were asked to brush their teeth to the best of their ability. To do so, they used their own devices or those provided. The plaque that remained after brushing was recorded using the modified Marginal Plaque Index (mMPI), expressing the percentage of segments remaining at the gingival margin that were colonized by plaque. Relationships to questionnaire data regarding demographics (age, gender, education status), toothbrushing behavior (frequency, utilization of an electric toothbrush), and selected dental treatments (professional tooth cleaning, lifetime periodontal treatment) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Even following the best possible brushing, roughly half of the segments (44% to 52%) across all age groups showed persisting plaque deposits. Survey data revealed the most pronounced group differences regarding education, whereby even in the group of younger seniors with a high education status, 37% of the areas showed persisting plaque after cleaning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data demonstrate that there are population-wide deficits in the ability to achieve oral cleanliness. Future prevention efforts should also focus on improving the population's toothbrushing skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"56 11","pages":"S82-S87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5982011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Past German Oral Health Studies (DMS) have revealed that toothbrushing patterns - a behavioral index comprising toothbrushing frequency, duration and timing - have steadily improved over the previous decades. What has not yet been investigated, however, are toothbrushing skills, ie, the ability to achieve oral cleanliness by removing all plaque deposits.

Method and materials: All participants of the DMS • 6 from the age groups of 12-year-olds, 35- to 44-year-olds, and 65- to 74-year-olds were asked to brush their teeth to the best of their ability. To do so, they used their own devices or those provided. The plaque that remained after brushing was recorded using the modified Marginal Plaque Index (mMPI), expressing the percentage of segments remaining at the gingival margin that were colonized by plaque. Relationships to questionnaire data regarding demographics (age, gender, education status), toothbrushing behavior (frequency, utilization of an electric toothbrush), and selected dental treatments (professional tooth cleaning, lifetime periodontal treatment) were assessed.

Results: Even following the best possible brushing, roughly half of the segments (44% to 52%) across all age groups showed persisting plaque deposits. Survey data revealed the most pronounced group differences regarding education, whereby even in the group of younger seniors with a high education status, 37% of the areas showed persisting plaque after cleaning.

Conclusion: The data demonstrate that there are population-wide deficits in the ability to achieve oral cleanliness. Future prevention efforts should also focus on improving the population's toothbrushing skills.

研究目的过去的德国口腔健康研究(DMS)显示,刷牙模式(包括刷牙频率、持续时间和时机的行为指数)在过去几十年中稳步改善。然而,尚未研究的是刷牙技巧,即通过清除所有牙菌斑沉积物达到口腔清洁的能力:方法和材料:所有参加 DMS 的 12 岁、35 至 44 岁和 65 至 74 岁年龄组的 6 名参与者都被要求尽力刷牙。为此,他们使用了自己的工具或提供的工具。刷牙后残留的牙菌斑使用改良的边缘牙菌斑指数(mMPI)进行记录,该指数表示牙龈边缘残留的牙菌斑所占的百分比。评估了与人口统计学(年龄、性别、教育状况)、刷牙行为(频率、电动牙刷的使用)和选定牙科治疗(专业洁牙、终生牙周治疗)问卷数据之间的关系:结果:即使在尽可能好的刷牙情况下,所有年龄组中仍有大约一半的人群(44% 至 52%)有持续的牙菌斑沉积。调查数据显示,教育程度方面的群体差异最为明显,即使在教育程度较高的年轻老年人群体中,也有 37% 的区域在清洁后仍有牙菌斑沉积:这些数据表明,在实现口腔清洁的能力方面,整个人群都存在缺陷。今后的预防工作也应侧重于提高人们的刷牙技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信