Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony During Dyadic Joint Action Is Increased by Task Novelty and Reduced by Social Anxiety.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Sarah Boukarras, Valerio Placidi, Federico Rossano, Vanessa Era, Salvatore Maria Aglioti, Matteo Candidi
{"title":"Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony During Dyadic Joint Action Is Increased by Task Novelty and Reduced by Social Anxiety.","authors":"Sarah Boukarras, Valerio Placidi, Federico Rossano, Vanessa Era, Salvatore Maria Aglioti, Matteo Candidi","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interpersonal physiological synchrony refers to the temporal coordination of autonomic states during social encounters. Previous studies indicate that physiological synchrony may arise during nonverbal interactions. Nevertheless, the role played by contextual and individual factors in determining its emergence is understudied. In this work, we examined heart rate synchrony during a cooperative joint action task, exploring how task constraints, novelty, and behavioral synchrony influence physiological alignment. To achieve this, we periodically modulated task demands by alternating between peer-to-peer and leader-follower dynamics, as well as between complementary and imitative movements, and their combinations. Additionally, we assessed the role of individual differences by examining the impact of dyad members' Social Anxiety and Perspective Taking levels. We further investigated how task demands and personal traits shape the perceived quality of social interactions and subject-level heart rate variability. Our findings revealed a significant increase in physiological synchrony and a decrease in perceived interaction quality when participants switched to a novel task version (i.e., during switch blocks) compared to task repetition. Task switching was also associated with increased heart rate variability. Notably, Social Anxiety negatively predicted physiological synchrony, suggesting that more socially anxious dyads were less likely to achieve physiological alignment. However, no relationship was observed between physiological synchrony and task performance. Overall, our results suggest that physiological synchrony intensifies when dyads navigate the challenge of learning a novel task together, and that both contextual and individual aspects contribute to its emergence.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 3","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpersonal physiological synchrony refers to the temporal coordination of autonomic states during social encounters. Previous studies indicate that physiological synchrony may arise during nonverbal interactions. Nevertheless, the role played by contextual and individual factors in determining its emergence is understudied. In this work, we examined heart rate synchrony during a cooperative joint action task, exploring how task constraints, novelty, and behavioral synchrony influence physiological alignment. To achieve this, we periodically modulated task demands by alternating between peer-to-peer and leader-follower dynamics, as well as between complementary and imitative movements, and their combinations. Additionally, we assessed the role of individual differences by examining the impact of dyad members' Social Anxiety and Perspective Taking levels. We further investigated how task demands and personal traits shape the perceived quality of social interactions and subject-level heart rate variability. Our findings revealed a significant increase in physiological synchrony and a decrease in perceived interaction quality when participants switched to a novel task version (i.e., during switch blocks) compared to task repetition. Task switching was also associated with increased heart rate variability. Notably, Social Anxiety negatively predicted physiological synchrony, suggesting that more socially anxious dyads were less likely to achieve physiological alignment. However, no relationship was observed between physiological synchrony and task performance. Overall, our results suggest that physiological synchrony intensifies when dyads navigate the challenge of learning a novel task together, and that both contextual and individual aspects contribute to its emergence.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信