Jennifer C Spencer, Hanwen Zhang, Brittany M Charlton, Phillip W Schnarrs, Felicitas Kuehne, Uwe Siebert, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Navkiran K Shokar, Jane J Kim, Michael P Pignone
{"title":"Cervical cancer screening and risk factor prevalence by sexual identity: A comparison across three national surveys in the United States.","authors":"Jennifer C Spencer, Hanwen Zhang, Brittany M Charlton, Phillip W Schnarrs, Felicitas Kuehne, Uwe Siebert, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Navkiran K Shokar, Jane J Kim, Michael P Pignone","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Women identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer (LGBQ) have lower cervical cancer screening use and differences in care access. Less known about how differences vary by data sources and within LGBQ subgroups. We evaluated LGBQ disparities in cervical cancer screening use and risk factors across three national surveys in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the 2019 and 2021 National Health Interview Survey, the 2018 and 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, and the 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth. We meta-analyzed self-reported cervical cancer screening to estimate pooled relative risks (pRR), comparing those identifying as LGBQ to those identifying as straight/heterosexual. We also evaluated differences in care access and behavioral risk factors by sexual identity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite demographic differences across surveys, all three surveys demonstrated a small reduction in up-to-date cervical cancer screening for LGBQ vs. straight/heterosexual women (pRR = 0.91 [CI 0.89-0.93]). The screening gap was larger for gay/lesbian (pRR: 0.90 [0.85-0.94]) than bisexual women (pRR: 0.94 [0.92-0.97]) and largest at younger ages (pRR age 21-29: 0.89 [CI 0.85-0.93]). LGBQ women reported consistently lower access to care across multiple measures. Risk factors were mixed, including higher smoking rates and higher HPV vaccination coverage for LGBQ women vs. straight.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>LGBQ women are less likely to be screened for cervical cancer. Closing disparities in care access and identifying feasible and acceptable screening interventions will help reduce these disparities. We must also ensure high-quality data collection to monitor disparities across and within key subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108262"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Women identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer (LGBQ) have lower cervical cancer screening use and differences in care access. Less known about how differences vary by data sources and within LGBQ subgroups. We evaluated LGBQ disparities in cervical cancer screening use and risk factors across three national surveys in the United States.
Methods: Data were from the 2019 and 2021 National Health Interview Survey, the 2018 and 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, and the 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth. We meta-analyzed self-reported cervical cancer screening to estimate pooled relative risks (pRR), comparing those identifying as LGBQ to those identifying as straight/heterosexual. We also evaluated differences in care access and behavioral risk factors by sexual identity.
Results: Despite demographic differences across surveys, all three surveys demonstrated a small reduction in up-to-date cervical cancer screening for LGBQ vs. straight/heterosexual women (pRR = 0.91 [CI 0.89-0.93]). The screening gap was larger for gay/lesbian (pRR: 0.90 [0.85-0.94]) than bisexual women (pRR: 0.94 [0.92-0.97]) and largest at younger ages (pRR age 21-29: 0.89 [CI 0.85-0.93]). LGBQ women reported consistently lower access to care across multiple measures. Risk factors were mixed, including higher smoking rates and higher HPV vaccination coverage for LGBQ women vs. straight.
Discussion: LGBQ women are less likely to be screened for cervical cancer. Closing disparities in care access and identifying feasible and acceptable screening interventions will help reduce these disparities. We must also ensure high-quality data collection to monitor disparities across and within key subgroups.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.